ROLE OF MINILATERAL AGREEMENTS IN INDO-PACIFIC POLICY OF THE US AND CHINA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-1-121-129

Keywords:

Indo-Pacific region, US-China rivalry, minilateralism, minilateral agreements, hub-and-spokes alliance model, latticework model, hedging, “bamboo diplomacy”, strategic swinging

Abstract

The Indo-Pacific region is in the process of forging a regional identity and order. Multilateral agreements such as ASEAN, the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework Agreement, and others play an important role in this process. The role of minilateral agreements in the architecture of regional order has been studied to a lesser extent. The article provides a theoretical justification of the role of minilateralism as a model of cooperation in integration processes and the organization of regional order. Using the example of the U.S. strategy in the Indo-Pacific region, the article studies the role of the hub-and-spokes alliance model and the latticework model. China's aspirations for global and regional leadership and expanding influence are reflected in its approach to minilateralism. The article proves this through the example of the Lancang-Mekong Agreement. Medium and small states in the region use minilateral agreements to diversify their relations with the rival US and China. For these states, participation in minilateral agreements is important for strengthening their agency and asserting their national interests through the foreign policy tools of hedging, bamboo diplomacy, and balancing. Furthermore, minilateral agreements are effective in solving local problems of pollution control, disaster management, etc.

Author Biography

Valery Mikhaylenko, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations

References

Гумбатов, Н. Ф., Кун, С. (2023) ‘Минила¬теральные союзы в американской стратегии сдерживания КНР в Индо-Тихоокеанском регионе’, Конфлик¬тология, Nota Bene, 1, сс. 1–10. [Gumbatov, N. F., Kuhn, S. (2023) 'Minilateral alliances in the US strategy to contain the PRC in the Indo-Pacific' [Minilateral'nye soyuzy v amerikanskoj strategii sderzhivaniya KNR v Indo-Tiho¬okeanskom regione], Conflictology, Nota Bene, 1, pp. 1–10. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0617.2023.1.39633 EDN: CXCNSM

Кашин, В. (2016) ‘Южно-Китайское море — Гаагский суд и военная напряженность’, Российский совет по международным делам, 14 июля [электронное издание]. [Kashin, V. (2016) 'The South China Sea - The Hague Court and Military Tensions', [YUzhno-Kitajskoe more - Gaagskij sud i voennaya napryazhennost'], Russian Council on Foreign Affairs, July 14, [online]. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/yuzhno-kitayskoe-more-gaagskiy-sud-i-voennaya-naprya¬zhennost/ (Accessed 15th August 2024) (In Russ.)].

Колдунова, Е. В. (2021) ‘Балансирование во внешней политике Вьетнама: достижения, перспективы, вызовы’, Компартия Вьетнама: новая веха в истории: Материалы Международного круглого стола, посвященного 90-летию образования Компартии Вьетнама в феврале 1930 г, Москва, 19-20 мая. М.: Ин-т Дальнего Востока РАН, сc. 41–54. [Koldunova, E. V. (2021) ‘Balancing in Vietnam's foreign policy: achievements, pro-spects, challenges’ [Balansirovanie vo vneshnej politike V'etnama: dostizheni-ya, perspektivy, vyzovy'], Communist Party of Vietnam: a new mile-stone in history: Proceedings of the International Round Table dedicated to the 90th anniver-sary of the formation of the Communist Party of Vietnam in February 1930, Moscow, May 19-20. Moscow: Federal State Budgetary Insti-tution of Science Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences, pp. 41–54. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.48647/IFES.2021.

91.003 EDN: GSNWLV

Михайленко, В. И. (2024) Индо-Тихоокеанская стратегия США при администрации Дж. Байдена, Вестник Томского госу¬дарственного университета. Фило¬софия. Социология. Политология, 80, cс. 230–243. [Mikhaylenko, V. I. (2024) ‘Indo-Pacific strategy of the USA under the administration of J. Biden’, [Indo-Tihookeanskaya strategiya SSHA pri administracii Dzh. Bajdena], Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya, 80, pp. 230–243. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17223/

X/80/21 EDN: DZALUU

Полулях, Д. С. (2023) ‘Мультилатерализм и минилатерализм как механизмы глобального управления’, США и Канада: экономика, политика, куль¬тура, 3, cс. 63–84. [Polulyakh, D. S. (2023) ‘Multilateralism and minilateralism as mechanisms of global governance’, [Mul'tilateralizm i minilateralizm kak mekhanizmy global'nogo upravleniya], USA and Canada: economics, politics, culture, 3, pp. 63-84. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.31857/S2686673023030057 EDN: HBCBTW

Семенов, А. В. (2018) ‘Концепция сообщества единой судьбы как глобальный проект Китая в эпоху Си Цзиньпина’. Россия - Китай: история и культура: Сборник статей и докладов участников XI Международной научно-практической конференции, Казань, 18–20 октября 2018 года. Казань: Академия наук Респуб¬лики Татарстан. cc. 292–302. [Semenov, A. V. (2018) 'The concept of the community of common destiny as a global project of China in the era of Xi Jinping' [Koncepciya soobshchestva edinoj sud'by kak global'nyj proekt Kitaya v epohu Si Czin'pina] in Russia - China: History and Culture: Collection of articles and reports of participants of the XI International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kazan, October 18-20, 2018. Kazan: Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, рp. 292–302. (In Russ.)].

Стрельцов, Д. В. (2018) ‘Индо-Тихоокеанский регион как новая реальность глобальной системы международных отношений’, Международная жизнь, 9, сc. 65–74. [Streltsov, D. V. (2018) ‘The Indo-Pacific region as a new reality of the global system of international relations’ [Indo-Tihookeanskij region kak novaya real'nost' global'noj sistemy mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij], International Life, 9, рp. 65–74. (In Russ.)].

Bajpai, K., and Laksmana, E. A. (2023) ‘Asian conceptions of international order: what Asia wants’, International Affairs, 99 (4), рp. 1371-1381, DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiad165 EDN: XCTPEU

Cooper, Z. (2024) ‘American Strategy and the Liberal International Order’ in Hosoya, Y., Kundnani, H. (eds.) The Transformation of the Liberal International Order. Evolutions and Limitations. Berlin: Springer, рp. 7-12.

Envall, H. D. P., Hatakeyama, K., Wilkins, T. S. and Hirono, M. (2024) ‘Japan/Australia Minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific (II):

Advancing Cooperation in Order-building and Geoeconomics, East-West Center Occasional Paper. Available at: https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/japanaustralia-minilateralism-indo-pa¬cific-ii-advancing-cooperation-order-buil¬ding-and (Accessed 4nd September 2024)

Holderness, A., Schaus, J., Velazquez N., Aldisert, A. Carroll, H. H. And Hardesty, E. (2024) ‘Expanding the tool kit to counter China’s economic coercion’, A report of the CSIS defense-industrial initiatives group, Washington: CSIS. Available at: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.

com/s3fs-public/2024-05/240506_DIIG_Expanding_ToolKit.pdf?VersionId=785wGqP.xIAVryt79tl2LBa7STlXnV6A (Accessed 15th August 2024)

Huang, C. -H., Ho, S. (2024) ‘Introduction: Domestic Determinants of Southeast Asia’s Relations with the United States and China’, Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 46 (1), рp. 1–15.

Johnstone, C. B., Poling, G. B. (2024) ‘A Tale of Two 2+2s: Japan and the Philippines’, Center for Strategic & International Studies, August 2. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/tale-two-22s-japan-and-philippines (Accessed 4th August 2024)

Kim, H.-J., Wu, H. (2024) ‘China premier agrees on cooperation with Seoul, Tokyo but issues veiled rebuke against their US ties’, AP news, 27

May. Available at: https://apnews.com/article/south-korea-china-japan-trilateral-6afe4c3e280995a7f

c16696edbd0a345 (Accessed 15th August 2024)

Koga, K. (2022). ‘A new strategic minilateralism in the Indo‑Pacific’, Asia Policy, 17(4), рp. 27–34. DOI: 10.1353/ASP.2022.0063 EDN: PGYNGO

Lee, J. H. (2024) ‘Latticework and U.S. Influence: Is It Strengthening or Weakening?’, KIMS Periscope, 353. Available at: https://en.kims.or.kr/issubrief/kims-peris¬cope/peri353/ (Accessed 24th September 2024)

Leonard, M. (2023) ‘China Is Ready for a World of Disorder. America Is Not’, Foreign Affairs, 102 (4), рp. 116–127.

Medcalf, R. (2019) ‘Mapping a Multipolar Future: The Contest for the Indo-Pacific’, Global Asia, 14 (4), рp. 58–69. Available at: https://www.globalasia.org/data/file/articles/f96dcdc74c0d6cd16a1df466f3fd292a.pdf (Accessed: 31st July 2024)

Moriyasu, K., Nakayama, S. (2024) ‘Tighter U.S.-Japan alliance is unexpected legacy of Kishida-Biden era. Uncertainty over successors threatens momentum of 'global partnership'’, Nikkei Asia. Available at: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/The-Big-Story/Tighter-U.S.-Japan-alliance-is-unexpected-legacy-of-Kishida-Biden-era (Accessed 28th August 2024)

Narasimhan, S. L. (2024) ‘Outcomes of the Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting’, Center for Strategic & International Studies, July 31, 2024. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/outcomes-Quad-foreign-minis¬ters-meeting (Accessed 25th August 2024)

Nedopil C., Zhang J., Mi L. (2024) ‘China’s investment in Asia Pacific; 2023 Report’, Griffith Asia Institute, Griffith University, 7 March. Available at: https://blogs.griffith.edu.au/asiainsights/chinas-investment-in-the-asia-pacific-2023-report/#:

~:text=In%20consequence%20Southeast%20Asia%20retains,level%20by%20USD%2012.4%20billion (Accessed 28th August 2024)

Patton, S., Lemahieu, H. (2024) ‘Asia Has No Hegemon. But U.S.-Chinese Bipolarity Is Good for America and the Region’, Foreign Affairs, September 13. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/asia-has-no-hegemon?utm_me¬dium=newsletters&utm_source=fatoday&utm_campaign=Asia%20Has%20No%20

Hegemon&utm_content=20240913&utm_term=EDZZZ003ZX (Accessed 28th August 2024)

Sun, Y., Tatsumi, Y. and Town, J. (2024) ‘Takeaways from the China-Japan-South Korea Trilateral Summit’. Available at: https://www.stimson.org/2024/takeaways-from-the-china-japan-south-korea-trila¬teral-summit/ (Accessed 15th August 2024)

Wilkins, T. (2022) ‘A Hub-and-Spokes “Plus” Model of us Alliances in the Indo-Pacific: Towards a New “Networked” Design’, Asian Affairs, 53 (3), рp. 457–480. DOI: 10.1080/03068374.2022.2090767 EDN: SYNCHA

Published

2025-04-04

How to Cite

Mikhaylenko В. И. (2025). ROLE OF MINILATERAL AGREEMENTS IN INDO-PACIFIC POLICY OF THE US AND CHINA. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 19(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-1-121-129