PARTY DISCIPLINE OF THE RUSSIAN STATE DUMA DEPUTIES: ELECTORAL SYSTEM FACTOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-1-34-43Keywords:
legislative behavior, party discipline, electoral systemэ, Russian State Duma, competing principals, roll call vote, natural experiment, difference-in-differenceAbstract
Institutional factors are important when considering deputies' legislative behavior. The main explanatory mechanism is the theory of competing principals, which suggests that deputies behave differently depending on the type of electoral system under which they are elected to parliament. The article analyzes party discipline of Russian State Duma deputies during the VI and VII convocations based on roll call vote data. Previous studies of party discipline in the Russian parliament have been inconclusive. Contemporary work has focused on non-institutional factors. The main question of the article is whether institutional factors such as the type of electoral system affect the legislative behavior of deputies in the Russian State Duma. The act of 2014, which changed the type of electoral system from fully proportional to mixed, is a natural experiment that provides an opportunity to use the difference-in-difference (DiD) method of analysis. The use of quasi-experimental design allows us to move from describing relationships to making reasonable assumptions about causal links. The study's findings indicate that deputies elected in single-mandate districts demonstrate less party discipline than deputies elected through party lists. The results provide a basis for formulating and testing more complex hypotheses to improve knowledge of what institutional factors influence deputies' legislative behavior in the modern Russian parliament.References
Макаркин, А. В. (2009) ‘Партийная система современной России и начало кризиса’, Неприкосновенный запас, 1(63) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2009/1/partijnaya-sistema-sovremennoj-rossii-i-nachalo-krizisa.html (дата обращения: 4 марта 2022). [Makarkin, A. V. (2009) ‘The Party System of Modern Russia and the Beginning of the Crisis’ [Partijnaja sistema sovremennoj Rossii i nachalo krizisa], Neprikosnovennyj zapas, 1(63) (In Russ.) [Online]. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2009/1/partijnaya-sistema-sovremennoj-rossii-i-nachalo-krizisa.html (Accessed 4th March 2022)].
Седашов, Е. А. (2021) ‘Методы каузального анализа в современной политической науке’, Политическая наука, 1, сс. 98–155. [Sedashov, E. A. (2021) ‘Methods of causal analysis in modern political science’ [Metody kauzal'nogo analiza v sovremennoj politicheskoj nauke], Political Science (RU), 1, рp. 98–155. (In Russ.)].
Центр политической конъюнктуры (2019) ‘Бездействующая Дума’ [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://cpkr.ru/issledo-vaniya/vybory-2021/bezdeystvuyu-shchaya-duma/ (дата обращения: 21 марта 2022). [Centr politicheskoj konjunktury (2019) ‘Inactive Duma’ [Bezdejstvujushhaja Duma] (In Russ.) [Оnline]. Available at: https://cpkr.ru/issledovaniya/vybory-2021/bezdeystvuyushchaya-duma/ (Accessed 21st March 2022)].
Bowler, S., Farrell, D. M. and Katz, R. S. (1999) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
Brancati, D. (2014) ‘Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects’, Annual Review of Political Science, 17, рp. 313–326. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-052013-115248
Carey, M. J. (2000) ‘Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions’, Comparative Political Studies, 33(6-7), рp. 735–761. DOI: 10.1177/
EDN: JRCDOT
Carey, M. J. (2007) ‘Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), рp. 92–107. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x
Carroll, R. and Nalepa, M. (2020) ‘The personal vote and party cohesion: Modeling the effects of electoral rules on intraparty politics’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 32(1), рp. 36–69. DOI: 10.1177/0951629819892336 EDN: YZIWYR
Ferrara, F. (2004) ‘Frogs, Mice and Mixed Electoral Institutions: Party Discipline in Italy’s XIV Chamber of Deputies’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 10, рp. 10–31. DOI: 10.1080/1357233042000322454
Gherghina, S. and Chiru, M. (2014) ‘Determinants of legislative voting loyalty under different electoral systems: Evidence from Romania’, International Political Science, 35(5), рp. 523–541.
Haspel, M., Remington, T. and Smith, S. (1998) ‘Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma’, Journal of Politics, 60(2), рp. 417–439. DOI: 10.2307/2647916 EDN: EPZXMN
Kunicova, J. and Remington, T. (2008) ‘Mandates, parties and dissent. Effect of electoral rules on parliamentary party cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994-2003’, Party Politics, 14(5), рp. 555–574. DOI: 10.1177/1354068808093390
Morgenstern, Sc. and Swindle, S. (2005) ‘Are Politics Local? An Analysis of Voting Patterns in 23 Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 38(2), рp. 143–170. DOI: 10.1177/0010414004271081 EDN: JRCHQX
Noble, B. (2020) ‘Authoritarian amendments: Legislative institutions as intra-executive constraints in post-Soviet Russia’, Comparative Political Studies, 53(9), рp. 1417–1454. DOI: 10.1177/0010414018797941 EDN: VEZYFT
Norris, P. (2004) Electoral Engineering. Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/
CBO9780511790980
Olivella, S. and Tavits, M. (2014) ‘Legislative Effects of Electoral Mandates’, British Journal of Political Science, 44(2), рp. 301–321. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123412000828
Rich, T. (2014) ‘Party Voting Cohesion in Mixed Member Legislative Systems: Evidence from Korea and Taiwan’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39(1), рp. 113–135. DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12035
Rubin, D. (1980) ‘Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test Comment’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(371), рp. 591–593. DOI: 10.2307/2287653
Shugart, M. and Carey, M. J. (1995) ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: a Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas’, Electoral Studies, 14(4), рp. 417–439.
Sieberer, U. (2010) ‘Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems: Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag’, Electoral Studies, 29, рp. 484–496. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.012
Thames, F. (2001) ‘Legislative Voting Behaviour in the Russian Duma: Understanding the Effect of Mandate’, EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES, 53(6), рp. 869–884. DOI: 10.1080/09668130120078531
Thames, F. (2005) ‘A House Divided: Party Strength and the Mandate Divide in Hungary, Russia, and Ukraine’, Comparative Political Studies, 38, рp. 282–303. DOI: 10.1177/0010414004272526 EDN: XOCDZR
Truex, R. (2020) ‘Authoritarian gridlock? Understanding delay in the Chinese legislative system’, Comparative Political Studies, 53(9), рp. 1455–1492.
Turovsky, R. (2018) ‘Institutionalization versus personalization: electoral effects of the mixed-member electoral system in Russia’, European Politics and Society, 19(5), рp. 595–622. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2018.1492197 EDN: WTNJCC
Williamson, S. and Magaloni, B. (2020) ‘Legislatures and Policy Making in Authoritarian Regimes’, Comparative Political Studies, 53(9), рp. 1525–1543. DOI: 10.1177/0010414020912288 EDN: CLPJBB
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.
