PARTISAN POLARIZATION IN THE US REGIONAL LEGISLATURES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-1-20-33Keywords:
party polarization, qualitative comparative analysis, non-citizens, safe districts, term limits, donationsAbstract
This paper examines party polarization in the United States. The approach used in the study has never been applied to the issue in question before. I focus on the lower houses of state legislatures and select four conditions that hypothetically influence the level of party polarization in such a way that one group of states is more likely to have a higher level of polarization of their legislatures than another. The research method used is Cluster QCA, a qualitative comparative analysis that allows working with panel data. The chronological framework of the study is limited to 2010–2016. According to the analysis, none of the conditions are specifically necessary. However, I find two configurations that serve as sufficient conditions for the stated positive outcome: first, a high level of non-citizens in the territory of the state along with the permission of unlimited donations from individual donors to finance election campaigns; second, a high proportion of safe districts along with term limits and a permission for unlimited do-nations from individual donors; third, a high proportion of safe districts together with term limits and a high level of non-citizens. However, the results obtained do not only confirm the importance of certain determinants in relation to the degree of party polarization but also indicate the significance of their presence in the form of the identified combinations.References
Согрин, В. В. (2003) ‘Двухпартийная система США: преемственность и обнов-ление’, ПОЛИС. Политические исследования, (3), рр. 164–170. [Sogrin, V. V. (2003) ‘The US Two-Party System: Continuity and Renewal’ [Dvuhpartijnaja sistema SShA: preemstvennost' i obnovlenie]. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovanija, (3), рр. 164–170. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.03.16]
Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (2000) The logic of conditional party government: Re-visiting the electoral connection. PIPC.
Barber, M. J. (2016) ‘Ideological donors, contribution limits, and the polarization of American legislatures’, The Journal of Politics, 78(1), рр. 296–310, DOI: 10.1086/683453
Bhattacharya, P. (2024) An Introduction to Panel Data QCA in R. CRC Press, DOI: 10.1201/9781003384595
Bonica, A., McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2013) ‘Why hasn't democracy slowed rising inequality? ’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), рр. 103–124, DOI: 10.1257/jep.27.3.103
Brunell, T. L. (2005) ‘The relationship between political parties and interest groups: Explaining patterns of PAC contributions to candidates for congress’, Political Research Quarterly, 58(4), рр. 681–688, DOI: 10.2307/3595653
Burden, B. C., & Snyder, R. (2021) ‘Explaining Uncontested Seats in Congress and State Legislatures’, American Politics Research, 49(3), pp. 247–258, DOI: 10.1177/1532673X20960565
Canen, N. J., Kendall, C., & Trebbi, F. (2021) Political parties as drivers of us polarization: 1927–2018, w28296. National Bureau of Economic Research, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3803669
Carey, J. M., Niemi, R. G., Powell, L. W., & Moncrief, G. F. (2006) ‘The effects of term limits on state legislatures: a new survey of the 50 states’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31(1), рр. 105–134, DOI: 10.3162/036298006X201742
Carson, J. L., Crespin, M. H., Finocchiaro, C. J., & Rohde, D. W. (2003) Linking congressional districts across time: Re-districting and party polarization in Congress. In: Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Carson, J. L., Crespin, M. H., Finocchiaro, C. J., & Rohde, D. W. (2007) ‘Redistricting and party polarization in the US House of Representatives’, American Politics Research, 35(6), рр. 878–904, DOI: 10.1177/1532673X07304263
Castro, R. G., & Ariño, M. A. (2016) ‘A general approach to panel data set-theoretic research’, Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 2, рр. 63–76, DOI: 10.6000/2371-1647.2016.02.06
Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1994) ‘Bonding, structure, and the stability of political parties: party government in the House’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, рр. 215–231.
Dettrey, B. J., & Campbell, J. E. (2013) ‘Has growing income inequality polarized the American electorate? Class, party, and ideological polarization’, Social Science Quarterly, 94(4), рр. 1062–1083, DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12026
Downs, A. (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Happer & Row.
Duşa, A. (2018) QCA with R: A comprehensive resource. Springer.
Forgette, R., Garner, A., & Winkle, J. (2009) ‘Do Redistricting Principles and Practices Affect US State Legislative Electoral Competition?’, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 9(2), pp. 151–175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000900900202
Fouirnaies, A., & Hall, A. B. (2022) ‘How do electoral incentives affect legislator behavior? Evidence from US state legislatures’, American Political Science Re-view, 116(2), рр. 662–676, DOI: 10.1017/S0003055421001064 EDN: NYBXKV
Garlick, A. (2017) ‘National policies, agendas, and polarization in American state leg-islatures: 2011 to 2014’, American Poli-tics Research, 45(6), рр. 939–979, DOI: 10.1177/1532673X17719719
Hill, S. J., & Tausanovitch, C. (2018) ‘Southern realignment, party sorting, and the polarization of American primary electorates, 1958–2012’, Public Choice, 176(1), рр. 107–132, DOI: 10.1007/s11127-017-0478-0 EDN: XNOPMI
Jacobson, G. C. (2000) Party polarization in national politics: The electoral connection. In: Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era, 5, pp. 17–18.
Kustov, A., Cerda, M., Rajan, A., Rosenbluth, F., & Shapiro, I. (2021) The rise of safe seats and party indiscipline in the us congress. Midwest Political Science As-sociation, Chicago, IL.
Lang, C., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2015) ‘Partisan sorting in the United States, 1972–2012: new evidence from a dynamic analysis’, Political Geography, 48, рр. 119–129, DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.015
Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., Green, J. C., Herrera, R., & Cooperman, R. (2010) ‘Activists and conflict extension in American party politics’, American Political Science Review, 104(2), рр. 324–346, DOI: 10.1017/S000305541000016X
Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006) ‘Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences’, Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 9(1), рр. 83–110, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138
Lee, F. E. (2009) Beyond ideology: Politics, principles, and partisanship in the US Senate. University of Chicago Press, DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470771.001.0001
Levendusky, M. (2009) The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and con-servatives became republicans. Univer-sity of Chicago Press, DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226473673.001.0001
Martin, G. J., & Webster, S. W. (2020) ‘Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization?’, Political Science Re-search and Methods, 8(2), рр. 215–231, DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2018.44
Massey, D. S., Kalter, F., & Pren, K. A. (2008) ‘Structural economic change and inter-national migration from Mexico and Poland’, Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziolo-gie und Sozialpsychologie, 60(48), 134.
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2003) Political polarization and in-come inequality. Available at SSRN 1154098.
McCarty, N. M., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006) Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal 411 riches.
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2016) Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. mit Press.
Shor, B., & McCarty, N. (2022) ‘Two decades of polarization in American state legis-latures’, Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 3(3–4), рр. 343–370, DOI: 10.1561/113.00000063 EDN: TQDVLO
Oana, I. E., Schneider, C. Q., & Thomann, E. (2021) Qualitative comparative analy-sis using R: A beginner's guide. Cam-bridge University Press, DOI: 10.1017/9781009006781
Olson, M. P., & Rogowski, J. C. (2020) ‘Legis-lative term limits and polarization’, The Journal of Politics, 82(2), рр. 572–586, DOI: 10.1086/706764 EDN: VFVUKA
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985) ‘A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis’, American journal of political science, рр. 357–384, DOI: 10.2307/2111172
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1984) ‘The polarization of American politics’, The journal of politics, 46(4), рр. 1061–1079.
Powell, L. W. (2014) ‘The influence of campaign contributions on the legislative process’, Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y, 9, 75, DOI: 10.1515/for-2013-0047
Powell, L. W., Wilcox, C., Francia, P. L., Herrnson, P. S., & Green, J. C. (2003) The financiers of congressional elections: Investors, ideologues, and in-timates. Columbia University Press, DOI: 10.7312/fran11618
Ragin, C. C. (2009) Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Universi-ty of Chicago Press, DOI: 10.7208/chicago/
001.0001
Ragin, C. C. (2014) The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quanti-tative strategies. Univ of California Press.
Roberts, J. M., & Smith, S. S. (2003) ‘Proce-dural contexts, party strategy, and con-ditional party voting in the US House of Representatives’, 1971–2000, American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), рр. 305–317, DOI: 10.1111/1540-5907.00021 EDN: BGPCYV
Rohde, D. W. (1991) Parties and leaders in the postreform House. University of Chica-go Press, DOI: 10.7208/chicago/978022672
001.0001
Rudolph, T. J. (1999) ‘Corporate and labor PAC contributions in House elections: Measuring the effects of majority party status’, The Journal of Politics, 61(1), рр. 195–206, DOI: 10.2307/2647782 EDN: EQAMRX
Schaffner, B. F. (2011) Party polarization. The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress. Oxford University Press, рр. 527–549. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559947.003.0023
Shor, B., Thurber, J. A., & Yoshinaka, A. (2015) Polarization in American state legislatures. American gridlock: the sources, character, and impact of polit-ical polarization, 203-21.
Shor, B., Berry, C., & McCarty, N. (2010) ‘A Bridge to Somewhere: Mapping State and Congressional Ideology on a Cross‐Institutional Common Space’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(3), рр. 417–448, DOI: 10.3162/036298010792069198
Shor, B., & McCarty, N. (2011) ‘The ideological mapping of American legislatures’, American Political Science Review, 105(3), рр. 530–551, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1676863
Sorauf, F. J. (1988) Money in American elec-tions. (No Title)
Swift, C. S., & VanderMolen, K. A. (2016) ‘Term limits and collaboration across the aisle: An analysis of bipartisan cosponsorship in term limited and non-term limited state legislatures’, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 16(2), рр. 198–226, DOI: 10.1177/1532440015608760
Theriault, S. M. (2008) Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge University Press.
Theriault, S. M., & Rohde, D. W. (2011) ‘The Gingrich senators and party polarization in the US Senate’, The Journal of Politics, 73(4), рр. 1011–1024, DOI: 10.1017/S0022381611000752
Walters, K., & Skocpol, T. (2024) ‘Immigration clashes, party polarization, and republi-can radicalization: Tracking shifts in state and national party platforms since 1980’, Studies in American Political Development, 38(1), рр. 1–15, DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X23000056 EDN: MFYLGE
Zingher, J. N., & Richman, J. (2019) ‘Polariza-tion and the nationalization of state leg-islative elections’, American Politics Research, 47(5), рр. 1036–1054, DOI: 10.1177/1532673X18788050
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.
