REGIONS WITH SPECIAL STATUS IN MULTI-LEVEL POLITICS: CLASSIFICATION AND TYPOLOGY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2026-3-48-59

Keywords:

multi-level politics, administrative-territorial division, regions, special status, classification, typology, factor analysis

Abstract

Modern states tend to homogenize their political space. In the multi-level interactions between the center and the administrative-territorial units of the first subnational level (regions), this is reflected, in particular, in the fact that regions within a single country typically enjoy identical political-administrative status. However, dozens of regions with special status have been identified worldwide. This article attempts to define this concept, assess its empirical content, and propose approaches to the typology and multidimensional classification of regions with special status. Since typology organizes objects on the basis of essential characteristics, it seems to be correct to build it on the origin of special status. Consequently, six types of region with special status have been identified: ethnic, historical, geographic, economic, metropolitan, and overseas regions. Classifications of regions with special status can be based on a wide variety of variable properties, along which they exhibit variability. To eliminate the correlation between them and create a general multidimensional classification, factor analysis was used, the results of which revealed four dimensions that define the space of variability of regions with a special status: political-institutional, political-subjective, ethnocultural and natural-geographical.

Author Biography

  • Petr Panov, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, RAS, Perm, Russian Federation.

    Doctor of Sciences (in Politics), Chief Researcher, Department for the Study of Political Institutions and Processes.

References

Мелешкина, Е. Ю. (2013) ‘Постимперские пространства: особенности форми-рования государств и наций’, Поли-тическая наука, 3, сс. 10–29. [Meleshkina, E. Yu. (2013) ’Post-imperial spaces: Peculiarities of state and nation-building’, Political science (RU), 3, pp. 10–29. (In Russ.)].

Окунев, И. Ю. (2019) Политическая геогра-фия. М.: Аспект Пресс. [Okunev, I. Yu. Political Geography. Moscow: As-pect Press Publishing House (In Russ.)].

Панов, П. В. (2025) ‘Национальные и регио-нальные элиты в поисках компромис-са? Реформирование регионального административно-территориального деления как проблема многоуровне-вой политики’, Власть и элиты, 1, сс. 7–37. [Panov, P. V. (2025) ‘Nation-al and regional elites in search of a compromise? Reforming regional ad-ministrative-territorial division as a problem of multilevel politics’, Power and elites, 1, pp. 7–37. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.31119/pe.2025.12.1.1

Себенцов, А. Б, Колосов, В. А. (2012) ‘Фе-номен неконтролируемых террито-рий в современном мире’, Полис. Политические исследования, 2, сс. 31–46. [Sebentsov, A. B., Kolosov, V. A. (2012) ‘The Phenomenon of Uncon-trolled Territories in the Modern World’, Polis. Political Studies, 2, pp. 31–46. (In Russ.)]

Сулимов, К. А. (2017а) ‘Баланс versus дис-баланс вокруг этнических региональ-ных автономий’, Балансируя притя-зания: этнические региональные ав-тономии, целостность государства и права этнических меньшинств. М.: Российская политическая энциклопе-дия (РОССПЭН), сс. 31–58. [Sulimov, K. A. (2017а) ‘Balance versus imbal-ance around ethnic regional autono-mies’, Balancing Claims: Ethnic Re-gional Autonomies, State Integrity, and Ethnic Minority Rights. Moscow: Rus-sian Political Encyclopedia, pp. 31–58. (In Russ.)].

Сулимов, К. А. (2017б) ‘Вариации полити-ческой субъектности этнических ре-гиональных автономий’, Балансируя притязания: этнические региональ-ные автономии, целостность госу-дарства и права этнических мень-шинств. М.: Российская политиче-ская энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), сс. 59–71. [Sulimov, K. A. (2017б) ‘Varia-tions in the political subjectivity of eth-nic regional autonomies’, Balancing Claims: Ethnic Regional Autonomies, State Integrity, and Ethnic Minority Rights. Moscow: Russian Political En-cyclopedia, pp. 59–71. (In Russ.)].

Туровский, Р. Ф. (2006) Политическая реги-оналистика. М.: Изд. Дом ГУ ВШЭ. [Turovsky, R. F. Political regional stud-ies. Moscow: Publishing House of the State University Higher School of Eco-nomics (In Russ.)].

Brubaker, R. (1998) ‘Myths and Misconcep-tions in the Study of Nationalism’, The State of the Nation: Ernest Gellner and the Theory of Nationalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 272–306.

Hooghe, L., Marks, G. (2016) Community, scale, and regional governance: A postfunctionalist theory of governance, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rokkan, S. (1973) ‘Cities, States and Nations: A Dimensional Model for the Study of Contrasts in Development’, Building states and nations: Models and data re-sources, vol. 1. London: Sage, pp. 73–91.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-08

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies

How to Cite

REGIONS WITH SPECIAL STATUS IN MULTI-LEVEL POLITICS: CLASSIFICATION AND TYPOLOGY. (2026). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 20(3), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2026-3-48-59