POLICY CALIBRATION OF THE EUROPEAN GREEN DEAL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ADOPTION OF CLEAN INDUSTRIAL DEAL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2026-2-143-157

Keywords:

European Union, Green Deal, climate policy, industrial policy, critical discourse analysis, policy calibration

Abstract

A few years after the publication of the European Green Deal, the European Commission has presented a new development of "green" policy in the EU – the Clean Industrial Deal. At first glance, the strategic document of 2025 has an implementation character and relates to the «joint roadmap», as indicated in its title. However, the status and significance of the «Clean Industrial Deal» and the «Green Deal» are identical. Both documents are Communications from the European Commission, semantically referring to a strategic «Deal», and were published in the first months of the Presidency of Ursula Von der Leyen — in December 2019 and February 2025, respectively. This spurred debate on whether the Green Deal remains relevant, or the industrial production has become an alternative model. The objective of this article is to determine the nature of transformation of the European Green Deal through the lens of political change, applying the concept of policy calibration. Both the prerequisites for political calibration and specific instances of its use are examined. Theoretically and methodologically, this research is grounded in the corpus of scholarly literature on political processes and political change. This research is underpinned by critical discourse analysis as a methodological framework. The empirical data consists of the EU documents, speeches and statements by the EU representatives starting from 2025. As a result, three types of policy calibrations were identified: from "green" to "clean"; from model to business case; from international cooperation to international competition. 

Author Biography

  • Ekaterina Skvortsova, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation,

    Graduate Student 

References

Арбатова, Н. К. (2022) ‘Климатические угрозы – новое измерение безопасности Евросоюза’, Полис. Политические исследования, 6, сс. 81–93. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.06.07 [Arbatova, N. K. (2022) ‘Climate threats – a new dimension of EU security’, Polis. Political Studies, 6, pp. 81–93. (In Russ.)].

Братерский, М. В., Энтина, Е. Г. и Энтин, М. Л. (2021) ‘Как Евразии подготовиться к Европейскому зеленому курсу’, Россия в глобальной политике, 19(4), cс. 205–219. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2021-19-4-205-218, [Braterskij, M. V., Entina, E. G. and Entin, M. L. (2021) ‘How can Eurasia be ready for the European Green Deal’, Russia in Global Affairs, 19(4), pp. 205–219. (In Russ.)].

Кавешников, Н. (2024) ‘“Зеленый курс” как триггер углубления интеграции в Европейском союзе’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 68(6), cс. 93–107. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-93-107 [Kaveshnikov, N. (2024) ‘“Green Deal” as a Trigger of Deepening of Integration in the European Union’, World Eсonomy and International Relations, 68(6), pp. 93–107. (In Russ.)].

Рогинко, С. А. (2025) «Зелёная» экспансия ЕС. Москва: РАН. ISBN 978-5-98163-233-4. [Roginko, S. A. (2025) Green Expansion of the EU].

Романова, Т. А. (2017) ‘Уровни анализа как инструмент оценки эволюции отношений России и Европейского союза’, Современная Европа, 2, cс. 30–42. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope220173042 [Romanova, T.A. (2017) ‘Levels of Analysis as a Tool for Assessing the Evolution of Relations Between Russia and the European Union’, Contemporary Europe, 2, pp. 30–42. (In Russ.)].

Романова, Т. А. (2021) ‘«Зеленый курс» и стрессоустойчивость энергетических отношений России и ЕС’, Вестник международных организаций, 16(3), cс. 108–123. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2021-03-05 [Romanova, T.A. (2021) ‘The Green Deal and The Resilience of EU-Russian Energy Relations’, International Organizations Research Journal, 16(3), p. 108–123. (In Russ.)].

Стрежнева, М. В. (2021) ‘Финансовые аспекты “Европейской зеленой сделки”’, Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН, 4, cс. 13–23. DOI: 10.20542/afij-2021-4-13-23 [Strezhneva, M.V. (2021) ‘Financial Aspects of the European Green Deal’, Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal, 4, pp. 13–23. (In Russ.)].

Стрежнева, М. В. (2025) ‘Идеология Зеленого курса и актуальные изменения в организации управления в Европейском союзе’, Полис. Политические исследования, 4, cс. 36–50. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.04.04 [Strezhneva, M.V. (2025) ‘The ideology of the Green Deal and current shifts in the organization of governance in the European Union’, Polis. Political Studies, 4, pp. 36–50. (In Russ.)].

Bloomfield, J. and Steward, F. (2020) ‘The Politics of the Green New Deal’, Political Quarterly, 9(84), p. 137–150. DOI:10.1111/1467-923X.12917

Bongardt, A. and Torres, F. (2022) ‘The European Green Deal: More than an Exit Strategy to the Pandemic crisis, a Building Block of a Sustainable European Economic Model’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(1), p. 170–185. DOI:10.1111/jcms.13264

Čavoški, A. (2020) ‘An ambitious and climate-focused Commission agenda for post COVID-19’, Environmental Politics, 29(6), pp. 1112–1117. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2020.1784010

Dupont, C., Oberthür, S. and Homeyer, I. (2020) ‘The Covid-19 crisis: a critical juncture for EU climate policy development?’, Journal of European Integration, 42(8), pp. 1095–1110. DOI:10.1080/07036337.2020.1853117

Dupont, C., Moore, B. et al. (2024) ‘Three decades of EU climate policy: Racing toward climate neutrality?’, WIREs Climate Change, 15(1). DOI: 10.1002/wcc.863

Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25(3), pp. 275–296. DOI: 10.2307/422246

Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Prontera, A. and Quitzow, R. (2022) ‘The EU as catalytic state? Rethinking European Climate and energy governance’, New Political Economy, 27(3), pp. 517–531. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2021.1994539

Ringel, M. and Thompson, S. (2025) ‘Europe’s Choice: The next stage of EU climate and energy policies’, Global Social Policy, 25(1), pp. 180–185. DOI: 10.1177/14680181241311995

Romanova, T. (2023) ‘A choice between neoliberal engagement and strategic autonomy? The impossibility of EU's green cooperation with Russia between 2019 and 2021’, Energy Policy, 172. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113329

Vesely, A. (2024) ‘Policy calibration and policy acceptability: assumptions, evidence, and practical implications’, Policy Design and Practice, 7(2), pp. 176–190. DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2024.2342098

Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2015) Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology. London: Sage Publication.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

POLICY CALIBRATION OF THE EUROPEAN GREEN DEAL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ADOPTION OF CLEAN INDUSTRIAL DEAL. (2026). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 20(2), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2026-2-143-157