К вопросу об организации психолексического исследования русской таксономии черт
Психология
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-613-627Ключевые слова:
психолексический подход, черты личности, русская таксономия, организация исследованияАннотация
Традиционно для выявления структуры личности используется психолексический подход. Он предполагает, что все значимые индивидуальные различия должны быть отражены в языке и, следовательно, с помощью анализа языка они могут быть выявлены. В частности, на основании психолексического исследования английского языка была получена модель Большая Пятерка. В данной статье обсуждаются некоторые аспекты организации психолексического исследования и возможные источники первоначального анализа языка: свободные самоописания, ежедневные разговоры, словари и т.д. Сделан вывод о преимуществе использования списков, составленных профессиональными лингвистами, — как правило, это словари. Рассмотрены части речи, которые можно взять за основу при анализе слов. Обычно исследователи сосредотачиваются на прилагательных, реже добавляют к списку существительные. Однако анализ литературы показывает необходимость использования всех возможных для подобного исследования частей речи. Акцентируются особенности немецкой и голландской методологий отбора слов. Сделан вывод о некотором преимуществе немецкой методологии. Наконец, приведены аргументы в пользу проведения психолексического исследования на русском языке и выявления русской таксономии черт личности. Предлагается примерный план такого исследования.Библиографические ссылки
Егорова М.С., Паршикова О.В., Митина О.В. Структура российского варианта шестифакторного личностного опросника HEXACO-PI-R // Вопросы психологии. 2019. № 5. С. 33–48.
Калугин А.Ю., Щебетенко С.А., Мишкевич А.М., Сото К.Д., Джон О. Психометрика русскоязычной версии Big Five Inventory–2 // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2021. Т. 18, № 1. С. 7–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33
Князев Г.Г., Митрофанова Л.Г., Бочаров А.В. Валидизация русскоязычной версии опросника Л. Голдберга «Маркеры факторов “Большой пятерки”» // Психологический журнал. 2010. Т. 31, № 5. С. 100–110.
Осин Е.Н., Рассказова Е.И., Неяскина Ю.Ю., Дорфман Л.Я., Александрова Л.А. Операционализация пятифакторной модели личностных черт на российской выборке // Психологическая диагностика. 2015. № 3. С. 80–104.
Похилько В.И., Федотова Е.О. Техника репертуарных решеток в экспериментальной психологии личности // Вопросы психологии. 1984. № 3. С. 151–157.
Хромов А.Б. Пятифакторный опросник личности: учеб.-метод. пособие. Курган: Изд-во КГУ, 2000. 23 с.
Шмелев А.Г., Похилько В.И. Экспериментальный подход к построению базисного семантического словаря черт личности // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология. 1985. № 3. С. 3–10.
Шмелев А.Г., Похилько В.И., Козловская-Тельнова А.Ю. Репрезентативность личностных черт в сознании носителя русского языка // Психологический журнал. 1991. Т. 12, № 2. С. 27–41.
Allport G.W., Odbert H.S. Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study // Psychological Monographs / ed. by J. Peterson. Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Publications, 1936. Vol. 47, no. 1. 171 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360
Almagor M., Tellegen A., Waller N.G. The Big Seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995. Vol. 69, iss. 2. P. 300–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.300
Angleitner A., Ostendorf F., John O.P. Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study // European Journal of Personality. 1990. Vol. 4, iss. 2. P. 89–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410040204
Ashton M.C., Lee K. A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality // European Journal of Personality. 2001. Vol. 15, iss. 5. P. 327–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.417
Barelds D.P.H., De Raad B. The role of word-categories in trait-taxonomy: evidence from the Dutch personality taxonomy // International Journal of Personality Psychology. 2015. Vol. 1, no. 1. P. 15–25.
Baumgarten F. Die Charactereigenschaften // Beiträge zur Charakter-und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Heft 1. Bern, CH: A. Francke, 1933. 81 S.
Benet-Martínez V., Waller N.G. Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the Big Seven factor model: Indigenous and imported Spanish personality constructs // Journal of Personality. 1997. Vol. 65, iss. 3. P. 567–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00327.x
Bolinger D. The loaded weapon: The use and abuse of language today. L.; N.Y.: Longman, 1980. 224 p.
Brokken F.B. The language of personality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Groningen, ND: University of Groningen, 1978.
Caprara G.V., Perugini M. Personality described by adjectives: The generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context // European Journal of Personality. 1994. Vol. 8, iss. 5. P. 357–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080502
Cattell R.B. The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1943. Vol. 38, iss. 4. P. 476–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116
Cheung F.M., van de Vijver F.J.R., Leong F.T.L. Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture // American Psychologist. 2011. Vol. 66, iss. 7. P. 593–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022389
Church A.T., Katigbak M.S., Reyes J.A.S. Toward a taxonomy of trait adjectives in Filipino: Comparing personality lexicons across cultures // European Journal of Personality. 1996. Vol. 10, iss. 1. P. 3–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199603)10:1<3::aid-per234>3.0.co;2-m
Cramer A.O.J., van der Sluis S., Noordhof A., Wichers M. et al. Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people // European Journal of Personality. 2012. Vol. 26, iss. 4. P. 414–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866
De Raad B. The Big Five personality factors: The psycholexical approach to personality. Göttingen, DE: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, 2000. 128 S.
De Raad B. The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language // European Journal of Personality. 1992. Vol. 6, iss. 1. P. 15–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060103
De Raad B., Barelds D.P.H. A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008. Vol. 94, iss. 2. P. 347–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.347
De Raad B., Barelds D.P.H., Levert E., Ostendorf F. et al. Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010. Vol. 98, iss. 1. P. 160–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017184
De Raad B., Di Blas L., Perugini M. Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages // European Journal of Personality. 1998. Vol. 12, iss. 1. P. 19–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199801/02)12:1<19::aid-per290>3.3.co;2-y
De Raad B., Hoskens M. Personality-descriptive nouns // European Journal of Personality. 1990. Vol. 4, iss. 2. P. 131–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410040206
De Raad B., Mlačić B. The lexical foundation of the Big Five factor model // The Oxford handbook of the five factor model / ed. by T.A. Widiger. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2017. P. 191–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.12
De Raad B., Mulder E., Kloosterman K., Hofstee W.K. Personality-descriptive verbs // European Journal of Personality. 1988. Vol. 2, iss. 2. P. 81–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020204
DeYoung C.G. Cybernetic big five theory // Journal of Research in Personality. 2015. Vol. 56. P. 33–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004
Di Blas L., Forzi M. An alternative taxonomic study of personality-descriptive adjectives in the Italian language // European Journal of Personality. 1998. Vol. 12, iss. 2. P. 75–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199803/04)12:2<75::aid-per288>3.0.co;2-h
Eysenck H.J. Dimensions of Personality. N.Y.: Praeger, 1947. 308 p.
Fleeson W., Jayawickreme E. Whole trait theory // Journal of Research in Personality. 2015. Vol. 56. P. 82–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009
Goldberg L.R. An alternative «description of personality»: the Big Five factor structure // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. Vol. 59, iss. 6. P. 1216–1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Goldberg L.R. From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality // Advances in Personality Assessment. Vol. 1 / ed. by C.D. Spielberger, J.N. Butcher. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982. P. 203–234.
Goldberg L.R. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons // Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 2 / ed. by L. Wheeler. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981. P. 141–165.
Gorbaniuk O., Czarnecka E., Chmurzyńska M. Taxonomy of person-descriptive terms in Polish: A psycho-lexical study // Current Problems of Psychiatry. 2011. Vol. 12, iss. 1. P. 100–106.
Gorbaniuk O., Korczak A., Toruj N., Czarnejko A. et al. Comprehensive psycholexical classification of Polish person-descriptive terms // Current Issues in Personality Psychology. 2019. Vol. 7, iss. 2. P. 142–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2019.82792
Heine S.J., Buchtel E.E. Personality: The universal and the culturally specific // Annual Review of Psychology. 2009. Vol. 60. P. 369–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163655
Hřebíčková M. The lexical approach to personality description in the Czech context // Ceskoslovenská Psychologie. 2007. Vol. 51. P. 50–61.
Katigbak M.S., Church A.T., Guanzon-Lapeña M.A., Carlota A.J., del Pilar G.H. Are indigenous personality dimensions culture specific? Philippine inventories and the five-factor model // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 82, iss. 1. P. 89–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.89
Klages L. The Science of Character. London: Allen & Unwin, 1929. 308 p.
Lee K., Ashton M.C. Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory // Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2004. Vol. 39, iss. 2. P. 329–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
Martin T.A., Costa P.T., Oryol V.E., Rukavishnikov A.A., Senin I.G. Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R // The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures / ed. by R.R. McCrae, J. Allik. Boston, MA: Springer, 2002. P. 261–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_13
McCrae R.R., Terracciano A. Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: data from 50 cultures // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005. Vol. 88, iss. 3. P. 547–561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
Saucier G. Factor structure of English-language personality type-nouns // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003. Vol. 85, iss. 4. P. 695–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.695
Saucier G., Goldberg L.R. Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects // Journal of Personality. 2001. Vol. 69, iss. 6. P. 847–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696167
Schmitt D.P., Allik J., McCrae R.R., Benet-Martínez V. The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2007. Vol. 38, iss. 2. P. 173–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297299
Semin G.R., Fiedler K. The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988. Vol. 54, iss. 4. P. 558–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558
Shala R.A., De Raad B., Arënliu A. The structure of Albanian personality descriptive trait-adjectives: A psycho-lexically based taxonomy // International Journal of Personality Psychology. 2020. Vol. 6. P. 1–11. URL: https://ijpp.rug.nl/article/view/37224 (accessed: 25.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.6.37224
Shchebetenko S.A., Kalugin A.Y., Mishkevich A.M., Soto C.J., John O.P. Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory–2: Evidence from the Russian version // Assessment. 2020. Vol. 27, iss. 3. P. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901
Shmelyov A.G., Pokhil’ko V.I. A taxonomy-oriented study of Russian personality-trait names // European Journal of Personality. 1993. Vol. 7, iss. 1. P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410070102
Singh J.K., Misra G., De Raad B. Personality structure in the trait lexicon of Hindi, a major language spoken in India // European Journal of Personality. 2013. Vol. 27, iss. 6. P. 605–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1940
Thalmayer A.G., Saucier G., Ole-Kotikash L., Payne D. Personality structure in east and west Africa: Lexical studies of personality in Maa and Supyire-Senufo // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2020. Vol. 119, iss 5. P. 1132–1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000264
Triandis H.C., Suh E.M. Cultural influences on personality // Annual Review of Psychology. 2002. Vol. 53, iss. 1. P. 133–160.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135200
Wiggins J.S. Personality structure // Annual Review of Psychology. 1968. Vol. 19, iss. 1. P. 293–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.19.020168.001453
Yik M.S.M., Bond M.H. Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale // International Journal of Psychology. 1993. Vol. 28, iss. 1. P. 75–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599308246919
References
Allport, G.W., and Odbert, H.S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological monographs. Princeton: Psychological Review Publications, Vol. 47, no. 1, 171 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360
Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., and Waller, N. G. (1995). The Big Seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 69, iss. 2, pp. 300–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.300
Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., and John, O.P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: a psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 89–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410040204
Ashton, M.C., and Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 15, iss. 5, pp. 327–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.417
Barelds, D.P., and De Raad, B. (2015). The role of word-categories in trait-taxonomy: evidence from the Dutch personality taxonomy. International Journal of Personality Psychology. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–25.
Baumgarten, F. (1933). [The character traits]. Beiträge zur Charakter-und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Heft 1 [Contributions to character and personality research. Book 1]. Bern: A. Francke. 81 p.
Benet-Martínez, V., and Waller, N.G. (1997). Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the Big Seven factor model: Indigenous and imported Spanish personality constructs. Journal of Personality. Vol. 65, iss. 3, pp. 567–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00327.x
Bolinger, D. (1980). The loaded weapon: The use and abuse of language today. London, New York: Longman Publ., 224 p.
Brokken, F.B. (1978). The language of personality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Groningen: University of Groningen.
Caprara, G.V., and Perugini, M. (1994). Personality described by adjectives: The generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 8, iss. 5, pp. 357–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080502
Cattell, R.B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. Vol. 38, iss. 4, pp. 476–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116
Cheung, F.M., van de Vijver, F.J. and Leong, F.T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist. Vol. 66, iss. 7, pp. 593–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022389
Church, A.T., Katigbak, M.S., and Reyes, J.A.S. (1996). Toward a taxonomy of trait adjectives in Filipino: Comparing personality lexicons across cultures. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 3–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199603)10:1<3::aid-per234>3.0.co;2-m
Cramer, A.O., van der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M. et al. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 414–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866
De Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 15–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060103
De Raad, B. (2000). The big five personality factors: the psycholexical approach to personality. Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publ., 128 S.
De Raad, B., and Barelds, D.P. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 94, iss. 2, pp. 347–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.347
De Raad, B., and Hoskens, M. (1990). Personality-descriptive nouns. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 131–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410040206
De Raad, B., and Mlačić, B. (2017). The lexical foundation of the Big Five factor model. The Oxford handbook of the five factor model. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.12
De Raad, B., Barelds, D.P., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F. et al. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 98, iss. 1, pp. 160–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017184
De Raad, B., Di Blas, L., and Perugini, M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 19–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199801/02)12:1<19::aid-per290>3.3.co;2-y
De Raad, B., Mulder, E., Kloosterman, K., and Hofstee, W.K. (1988). Personality-descriptive verbs. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 81–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020204
DeYoung, C.G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 56, pp. 33–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004
Di Blas, L., and Forzi, M. (1998). An alternative taxonomic study of personality-descriptive adjectives in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 75–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199803/04)12:2<75::aid-per288>3.0.co;2-h
Egorova, M.S., Parshikova, O.V., Mitina, O.V. (2019) [Structure of the Russian variant of a six-factor HEXACO personality inventory]. Voprosy psihologii. Iss. 5, pp. 33–48.
Eysenck, H.J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. New York: Praeger, 308 p.
Fleeson, W., and Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 56, pp. 82–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009
Goldberg, L.R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publ., vol. 2, pp. 141–165.
Goldberg, L.R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. Advances in Personality Assessment. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Publ., vol. 1, pp. 203–234.
Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative «description of personality»: the Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 59, iss. 6, pp. 1216––1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Gorbaniuk, O., Czarnecka, E., and Chmurzyńska, M. (2011). Taxonomy of person-descriptive terms in Polish: A psycho-lexical study. Current Problems of Psychiatry. Vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 100–106.
Gorbaniuk, O., Korczak, A., Toruj, N., Czarnejko, A. et al. (2019). Comprehensive psycholexical classification of Polish person-descriptive terms. Current Issues in Personality Psychology. Vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 142–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2019.82792
Heine, S.J. and Buchtel, E.E. (2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 60, pp. 369–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163655
Hřebíčková, M. (2007). The lexical approach to personality description in the Czech context. Ceskoslovenská Psychologie [Czechoslovak Psychology]. Vol. 51, pp. 50–61.
Hromov, A.B. (2000). Pyatifaktornyj oprosnik lichnosti: ucheb.-metod. posobie [The Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire: Training Manual]. Kurgan: Izd-vo KGU. 23 p.
Kalugin, A.Yu., Shchebetenko, S.A., Mishkevich, A.M., Soto, C.J., John, O.P. (2021) [Psychometric Properties of the Russian Version of the Big Five Inventory-2]. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33
Katigbak, M.S., Church, A.T., Guanzon-Lapeña, M.A., Carlota, A.J. and del Pilar, G.H. (2002). Are indigenous personality dimensions culture specific? Philippine inventories and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 82, iss. 1, pp. 89–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.89
Klages, L. (1929). The science of character. London: Allen & Unwin Publ., 308 p.
Knyazev, G.G., Mitrofanova, L.G. and Bocharov, A.V. (2010). [Validation of the Russian version of L. Goldberg’s «Big Five Factor Markers» questionnaire]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Journal of Psychology]. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 100–110.
Lee, K. and Ashton, M.C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Vol. 39, iss. 2, pp. 329–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
Martin, T.A., Costa, P.T., Oryol, V.E., Rukavishnikov, A.A., Senin, I.G. (2002). Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R. The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. Boston, MA: Springer Publ., pp. 261–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_13
McCrae, R.R. and Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 88, iss. 3, pp. 547–561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
Osin, E.N., Rasskazova, E.I., Neyaskina, Yu.Yu., Dorfman, L.Ya. and Aleksandrova, L.A. (2015). [Operationalization of the five-factor personality trait model on a Russian sample]. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika [Psychological diagnostics]. Iss. 3, pp. 80–104.
Pohil’ko, V.I. and Fedotova, E.O. (1984). [The Repertory Grid Technique in Experimental Personality Psychology]. Voprosy psihologii. No. 3, pp. 151–157.
Saucier, G. (2003). Factor structure of English-language personality type-nouns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 85, iss. 4, pp. 695–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.695
Saucier, G. and Goldberg, L.R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality. Vol. 69, iss. 6, pp. 847–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696167
Schmitt, D.P., Allik, J., McCrae, R.R. and Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Vol. 38, iss. 2, pp. 173–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297299
Semin, G.R. and Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 54, iss. 4, pp. 558–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558
Shala, R.A., De Raad, B. and Arënliu, A. (2020). The structure of Albanian personality descriptive trait-adjectives: A psycho-lexically based taxonomy. International Journal of Personality Psychology. Vol. 6, pp. 1–11. Available at:https://ijpp.rug.nl/article/view/37224 (accessed 25.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.6.37224
Shchebetenko, S.A., Kalugin, A.Y., Mishkevich, A.M., Soto, C.J. and John, O, (2020). Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory–2: Evidence from the Russian version. Assessment. Vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901
Shmelev, A.G. and Pohil’ko, V.I. (1985). [Experimental approach to constructing a basic semantic dictionary of personality traits]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya [Herald of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology]. No. 14, pp. 3–10.
Shmelev, A.G., Pohil’ko, V.I. and Kozlovskaya-Tel’nova, A.Yu. (1991). [Representativeness of Personality Traits in the Mind of a Russian Language Speaker]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Journal of Psychology]. Vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 27–41.
Shmelyov, A.G. and Pokhil’ko, V.I. (1993). A taxonomy-oriented study of Russian personality-trait names. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410070102
Singh, J.K., Misra, G. and De Raad, B. (2013). Personality structure in the trait lexicon of Hindi, a major language spoken in India. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 27, iss. 6, pp. 605–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1940
Thalmayer, A.G., Saucier, G., Ole-Kotikash, L. and Payne, D. (2020). Personality structure in east and west Africa: Lexical studies of personality in Maa and Supyire-Senufo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 119, iss. 5, pp. 1132–1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000264
Triandis, H.C. and Suh, E.M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 53, iss. 1, pp. 133–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135200
Wiggins, J.S. (1968). Personality structure. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 293–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.19.020168.001453
Yik, M.S.M. and Bond, M.H. (1993). Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. International Journal of Psychology. Vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 75–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599308246919
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2022 Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
