The ontological foundations of real humanism and the abortion issue
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-2-230-240%20Keywords:
abortion, real humanism, neo-Malthusianism, Marxism, social substratum, productive forcesAbstract
Marxist philosophy in its practical application (real humanism) can become a reliable support for the progressive part of the anti-abortion movement, opposing the bourgeois-liberal, neo-Malthusian pro-abortion ideology. Marxist ontological criticism of demographic politics under capitalism can contribute to this. From Marx’s point of view, capitalism inevitably creates «surplus» working population. This «surplus» generates either poverty or artificial abortion. Gender equality under capitalism receives a characteristic market-focused and social-Darwinist interpretation. Neo-Malthusian sociocultural «projections» of the market economy onto the worldview are expressed in the absolutization of individual autonomy, in the underestimation of the potential side of social reality, and in the desire to receive more from society than to give to it. Neo-Malthusianism seeks to dehumanize, to deny the fetus, and sometimes even the newborn, the right to human dignity, while the ontological foundation of real humanism is the affirmation of the essential identity of people with each other, which is ensured by the presence of a material social substratum in all people, including fetuses. Marxist social ontology regards the birth of a sufficient number of children as a necessary condition for the development of productive forces and the humanization of production relations. This also presupposes the creation of a large number of highly skilled jobs. As a conclusion, it is argued that the practice of real humanism with regard to the abortion problem must consist in the struggle for the creation of such jobs, for real social protection of motherhood and childhood, and for other measures aimed at the general development of the productive forces. In addition, having many children should become a common occurrence in families of real humanists.References
Антипова Н.Д. Аборт как этическая проблема: дис. канд. филос. наук. М., 2005. 120 с.
Антипова Н.Д. Этические коллизии вокруг проблемы аборта в рамках различных ценностномировоззренческих ориентаций // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 7: Философия. 2005. № 1. С. 107–119.
Барг О.А. Системный подход, философия и естествознание / Перм. гос. нац. иссл. ун-т. Пермь, 2018. 112 с.
Бузгалин А.В. Из царства необходимости в царство свободы: творческий марксизм Э.В. Ильенкова и вызовы социализму в условиях «постиндустриального общества» // Э.Ильенков и социализм: сб. науч. ст. по материалам Ильенковских Чтений, 2001 / под ред. С.Н. Мареева. М., 2002. С. 20–52.
Ласточкин А.В. Субстратная сторона развития как способа существования материи // Низшее и высшее, системы и элементы в процессе развития: межвуз. сб. науч. тр. / под ред. С.М. Шалютина и др.; Челяб. гос. пед. ин-т. Челябинск, 1988. С. 4–11.
Лоскутов Ю.В. Введение в теорию социальной субстанции / Перм. гос. нац. иссл. ун-т. Пермь, 2021. 277 с. URL: https://elis.psu.ru/node/ 642769/pdfbook/download/Vvedenie_v_teoriyu_soci alnoy_substancii.pdf (дата обращения: 24.11.2023).
Мальтус Т.Р. Опыт закона о народонаселении / пер. с англ. И.А. Вернера. М.: Изд. К.Т. Солдатенкова. 1895. 320 с.
Маркс К. К критике политической экономии // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч.: в 50 т. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1959. Т. 13. С. 1–167. Маркс К. Капитал. Критика политической экономии. Т. 1 // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч.: в 50 т. 2е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1960. Т. 23. 908 с.
Маркс К. Экономические рукописи 1857–1859 годов // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч.: в 50 т. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1968. Т. 46, ч. 1. C. 3–510.
Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Немецкая идеология // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч.: в 50 т. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1955. Т. 3. С. 7–544.
Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Святое семейство // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч.: в 50 т. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1955. Т. 2. С. 3–230.
Орлов В.В. Материя, развитие, человек. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. гос. ун-та, 1974. 398 с.
Томсон Дж. В защиту абортов / пер. с англ. А.С. Финиареля // Этическая мысль. 2017. Т. 17, № 2. С. 125–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/ 2074-4870-2017-17-2-125-142 Aris B. bne:Chart — World’s economic centre of gravity continues shift east // bne IntelliNews. 2015. Jun. 9. URL: https://www.intellinews.com/bne-chartworld-s-economic-centre-of-gravity-continues-shifteast-500446729/?archive=bne (accessed: 24.11.2023).
Boonin D. A Defense of Abortion. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 368 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610172 Giubilini A, Minerva F. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013. Vol. 39, iss. 5. P. 261–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100411
Greasley K. Arguments about Abortion: Personhood, Morality, and Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017. 280 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198766780.0 01.0001 Kershnar S. Does the Pro-Life Worldview Make Sense? Abortion, Hell, and Violence Against Abortion Doctors. N.Y.: Routledge, 2017. 204 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315142265
Lindemann H., Verkerk M. Ending the Life of a Newborn. The Groningen Protocol // Hastings Center Report. 2008. Vol. 38, no. 1. P. 42–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2008.0010
Marquis D. Why Abortion is Immoral // The Journal of Philosophy. 1989. Vol. 86, iss. 4. P. 183– 202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2026961
Schouten G. Fetuses, Orphans, and a Famous Violinist: On the Ethics and Politics of Abortion // Social Theory and Practice. 2017. Vol. 43, iss. 3. P. 637– 665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ soctheorpract20178417
Shaver Sh. Body rights, social rights and the liberal welfare state // Critical Social Policy. 1994. Vol. 13, iss. 39. P. 66–93. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/026101839401303905
Tooley M. Abortion and Infanticide // Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1972. Vol. 2, no. 1. P. 37–65.
References
Antipova, N.D. (2005). Abort kak eticheskaya problema: dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Abortion as an ethical problem: dissertation]. Moscow, 120 p.
Antipova, N.D. (2005). [Ethical conflicts around the problem of abortion in the framework of different value-world orientations]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy]. No. 1, pp. 107–119.
Aris, B. (2015). bne:Chart — World’s economic centre of gravity continues shift east. bne IntelliNews. Jun. 9.Available at: https://www.intellinews.com/bne-chart-world-seconomic-centre-of-gravity-continues-shift-east500446729/?archive=bne (accessed 24.11.2023).
Barg, O.A. (2018). Sistemnyy podkhod, filosofiya i estestvoznanie [Systems approach, philosophy and natural science]. Perm: PSU Publ., 112 p.
Boonin, D. (2002). A defense of abortion. New York: Cambridge University Press, 368 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610172 Buzgalin, A.V. (2002). [From the realm of necessity to the realm of freedom: E.V. Ilyenkov’s creative Marxism and the challenges to socialism in a «postindustrial society»]. E. Il’enkov i sotsializm: sbornik nauchnykh statey po materialam Il’enkovskikh Chteniy, 2001 [E. Ilyenkov and Socialism. Collection of Scientific Articles on the Materials of Ilyenkov Readings, 2001]. Moscow, pp. 20–52.
Giubilini, A. and Minerva, F. (2013). After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? Journal of Medical Ethics. Vol. 39, iss. 5, pp. 261–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100411
Greasley, K. (2017). Arguments about abortion: Personhood, morality, and law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 280 p. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198766780.001.0001
Kershnar, S. (2017). Does the pro-life worldview make sense? Abortion, hell, and violence against abortion doctors. New York: Routledge Publ., 204 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315142265
Lastochkin, A.V. (1988). [Substrate side of development as a mode of existence of matter]. Nizshee i vysshee, sistemy i elementy v protsesse razvitiya, pod red. S.M. Shalyutina I dr. [S.M. Shalyutin et al. (eds.) Lower and higher, systems and elements in the development process]. Chelyabinsk: ChSPI Publ., pp. 4-11.
Lindemann, H. and Verkerk, M. (2008). Ending the life of a newborn. The Groningen protocol. Hastings Center Report. Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 42–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2008.0010
Loskutov, Yu.V. (2021). Vvedenie v teoriyu sotsial’noy substantsii [Introduction to social substance theory]. Perm: PSU Publ., 277 p. Available at: https://elis.psu.ru/node/642769/pdfbook/download/V vedenie_v_teoriyu_socialnoy_substancii.pdf (accessed 24.11.2023). Malthus, T.R. (1895). Opyt zakona o narodonaselenii [An essay on the principle of population]. Moscow: K.T. Soldatenkov Publ., 320 p. Marquis, D. (1989). Why abortion is immoral. The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 86, iss. 4, pp. 183– 202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2026961
Marx, K. (1959). [Toward a critique of political economy]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 13, pp. 1–167.
Marx, K. (1960). [Capital. Vol. 1]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 23, 908 p.
Marx, K. (1968). [Economic Manuscripts of 1857–1859]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 46, pt. 1., pp. 3–510.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1955). [Holy family]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 2, pp. 3–230.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1955). [German ideology]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 3, pp. 7–544.
Orlov, V.V. (1974). Materiya, razvitie, chelovek [Matter, development, human]. Perm: PSU Publ., 398 p. Schouten, J. (2017). Fetuses, orphans, and a famous violinist: On the ethics and politics of abortion. Social Theory and Practice. Vol. 43, iss. 3, pp. 637– 665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ soctheorpract20178417
Shaver, S. (1994). Body rights, social rights and the liberal welfare state. Critical Social Policy. Vol. 13, iss. 39, pp. 66–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839401303905
Tomson, J. (2017). [In defense of abortion]. Eticheskaya mysl’ [Ethical Thought]. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 125–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/20744870-2017-17-2-125-142
Tooley, M. (1972). Abortion and infanticide. Philosophy and Public Affairs. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–65.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
