How to whistle something that can not be said
Philosophy of creativity in the becoming of the culture’s language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-2-180-191Keywords:
language, art, semantics, exemplification, symbol, patternAbstract
Art languages are not easy to study because, even if their syntax can be analyzed, their semantics poses a difficult problem. Natural descriptive language with its semantics as a reference to external objectivity does not work as a model for this area because, firstly, in this case the specificity of art as such is lost, and secondly, such a model is not applicable to music, surrealist painting, and avant-garde poetry. Understanding artistic symbols as directly referring to human emotions also cannot form the basis of a semantic theory of art since the connection between expressive means and emotions may turn out to be natural and not conventional, which contradicts the very idea of a sign-symbol. The right path can be indicated by the concept of exemplification, proposed by Nelson Goodman. Within this concept, some object that has some natural commonality with the signified — for example, color — is in a relationship of back reference with a term or concept that semantically refers to this object. However, such a semantic solution does not seem sufficient in the case of such «non-objective» arts as music since it does not answer the question about the nature of the signified itself. As a possible solution, the concept of «showing» is proposed, which, as an alternative to «saying», was put forward by Ludwig Wittgenstein in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Saying and showing are seen there as mutually exclusive: what is shown in the signs of language cannot be expressed through language. In addition to the logical form, the object of showing can be the «limit of the world», understood by Wittgenstein as a synonym for the «metaphysical subject». What is common in showing the logical form and the limit of the world is the «method of projection». Thus, a musical phrase as an example within the relation of exemplification indicates a way of projecting the world that shifts its limit and accordingly changes the «experiencing of the world as a whole».References
References
Bar-Elli, G. (2006). Wittgenstein on the experience of meaning and the meaning of music. Philosophical Investigations. Vol. 29, iss. 3, pp. 217–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679205.2006.00291.x
Boertz, B. (1970). Nelson Goodman’s languages of art from a musical point of view. The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 67, iss. 16, pp. 540–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2024578
Brown, S. Martinez, M.J. and Parsons, L.M. (2006). Music and language side by side in the brain: a PET study of the generation of melodies and sentences. European Journal of Neuroscience. Vol. 23, iss. 10, pp. 2791–2803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04785.x
Goel, V. (1991). Notationality and the information processing mind. Minds and Machines. Vol. 1, pp. 129–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00361034
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: an approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publ., 290 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350928541
Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R.S. (1996). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., 384 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12513.001.0001
Pearce, D. (1988). Musical expression: Some remarks on Goodman’s theory. E. Rantala, L. Rowell, E. Tarasti (eds.) Essays on the philosophy of music. Helsinki, FI: Philosophical Society of Finland Publ., pp. 228–243.
Ramsey, F.P. (1931). General Propositions and Causality. Ramsey F.P. The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co Publ., pp. 237–255.
Robinson, J. (2000). Languages of art at the turn of the century. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 213–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/432102
Sanfélix Vidarte, V. (2013). Showing and saying. An aesthetic difference. Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico [Aisthesis. Practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics]. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 139–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13128/Aisthesis-12843
Slevc, L.R., Rosenberg, J.C. and Patel, A.D. (2009). Making psycholinguistics musical: Selfpaced reading time evidence for shared processing of linguistic and musical syntax. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 374–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/16.2.374
Tillman, B. (2012). Music and language perception: Expectations, structural integration, and cognitive sequencing. Topics in Cognitive Science. Vol. 4, iss. 4, pp. 568–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01209.x
Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Tractatus logicophilosophicus, transl. by D.F. Pears, B.F. McGuinness. London: Routledge Publ., 106 p.
Wittgenstein, L. (1998). The blue and brown books. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publ., 208 p.
Wittgenstein, L. (2005). Big Typescript: TS 213, transl. by C.G. Luckhardt, M.E. Aue. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publ., 1056 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752906
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (transl. by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker, J. Schulte). 4th ed. Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell Publ., 592 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.