The practices of human spatial existence in a post-conflict situation
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2023-4-527-535%20Abstract
This article attempts to develop understanding of human practices in a post-conflict situation within the framework of the spatially oriented approach. Traditional methods of understanding conflicts, such as trauma studies, focus on the psycho-emotional state of the participants in a conflict. Based on the works of A. Lefebvre, M. de Certeau and G. Bachelard, the author proposes to consider this problem in a manner of Philosophical Anthropology, which allows us to identify the relationship between the experience of a post-conflict situation and everyday space of the individual. Considering the spaces of a post-conflict situation as «non-places», and based on the theoretical approach of M. de Certeau, the author proposes several tactics for a person’s staying and adaptation to a post-conflict situation. The author believes that there are two main tactics of this kind: the «tactics of immobility» and the tactics of «temporary rootedness». «Immobility» is understood as an individual’s right not to act, as an opportunity while not to form but to comprehend the probabilities of constructing new spatial connections «here and now». In addition, «immobility» is considered by the author as an opportunity to move on to the next step — «temporary rootedness». Such rootedness is characterized by more stable boundaries and spatial practices that allow us to reproduce «home» practices, and thereby find psycho-emotional and even physiological stability in the new post-conflict everyday life. The possibility of reproducing elements of the old pre-conflict existence sets the prospect of existence in a new reality.References
Абакумова И.В., Рядинская Е.Н. Особенности постконфликтного восстановления: отечественный и зарубежный опыт // Вестник Красноярского государственного педагогического университета им. В.П. Астафьева. 2016. № 4(38). С. 208–214.
Айерман Р. Социальная теория и травма / пер. Д.О. Хлевнюк // Социологическое обозрение. 2013. Т. 12, № 1. С. 121–138.
Аникин Д.А., Головашина О.В. Травмы культурной памяти: концептуальный анализ и методологические основания исследования // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2017. № 425. С. 78–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/ 15617793/425/10
Бауман З. Текучая современность. СПб.: Питер, 2008. 240 c.
Киссер Т.С. Немцы Урала: этноистория и идентичность. СПб.: МАЭ РАН, 2019. 372 с.
Кропачев С.А. Современная российская историография депортаций народов СССР в годы Великой Отечественной войны // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2011. № 23(238). С. 100–103.
Лефевр А. Производство пространства / пер. с фр. И.К. Стаф. М.: Strelka Press, 2015. 432 с.
Макалаков Т.Ж., Шотбакова Л.К. Зарубежная историография проблемы адаптации народов Северного Кавказа, насильственно переселенных в Казахстан в 40-х гг. ХХ века // Вестник Карагандинского университета. Серия: История. Философия. 2022. № 4(108). С. 135–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31489/2022hph4/135-141
Плеснер Х. Ступени органического и человек: Введение в философскую антропологию / пер. с нем. А.Г. Гаджикурбанова. М.: РОССПЭН, 2004. 368 с.
Сенявская Е.С. Человек на войне. Психологоисторические очерки. М.: Ин-т рос. истории РАН, 1997. 232 с.
Серто М. де. Изобретение повседневности. 1. Искусство делать / пер. с фр. Д.Я. Калугина, Н.С. Мовниной. СПб.: Изд-во Европейского ун-та в Санкт-Петербурге, 2013. 330 с.
Урри Дж. Мобильности / пер. с англ. А.В. Лазарева. М.: Праксис, 2012. 576 c.
Филиппов А.Ф. Социология пространства. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2008. 290 с.
Черепанова Е.С. Философия конфликта: учеб. пособие. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2016. 196 с.
Channa Z.H., Pathan P.A., Shaikh E.Kh.Z. Migration: Concept, Types & Rational // Journal of Grassroot. 2023. Vol. 50, no. 2. P. 90–101. Cresswell T. Mobilities II: Still // Progress in Human Geography. 2012. Vol. 36, iss. 5. P. 645–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423349
Cresswell T. On the move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. N.Y.: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2006. 340 p. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9780203446713
Hughes V. Narrating «Home»: Experiences of German Expellees after the Second World War // Refuge. 2016. Vol. 32, no. 1. P. 28–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40381
References
Abakumova, I.V. and Ryadinskya, E.N. (2016). [The specific features of a post-conflict reconstruction: domestic and foreign experience]. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.P. Astaf’eva [Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafyev]. No. 4(38), pp. 208–214.
Aierman, R. (2013). [Social theory and trauma]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review]. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 121–138. Anikin, D.A. and Golovashina, O.V. (2017) [Trauma to cultural memory: conceptual analysis and methodological bases of research]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. No. 425, pp. 78–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/425/10
Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekuchaya sovremennost’ [Liquid modernity]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 240 p.
Certeau, M. de. (2013). Izobretenie povsednevnosti. 1. Iskusstvo delat’ [The practice of everyday life]. St. Petersburg: European University Publ., 330 p.
Channa, Z.H., Pathan, P.A. and Shaikh, E.Kh.Z. (2023). Migration: Concept, types & rational. Journal of Grassroot. Vol. 50, no. II, pp. 90–101.
Chrepanova, E.S. (2016). Filosofiya konflikta [Philosophy of conflict]. Yekaterinburg: UFU Publ., 196 p.
Cresswell, T. (2012). Mobilities II: Still. Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 36, iss. 5, pp. 645–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423349
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York: Taylor & Francis Group Publ., 340 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203446713
Filippov, A.F. (2008). Sotsiologiya prostranstva [Sociology of space]. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 290 p.
Hughes, V. (2016). Narrating «Home»: Experiences of German Expellees after the Second World War. Refuge. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 28–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40381
Kisser, T.S. (2019). Nemtsy Urala: etnoistoriya i identichnost’ [Germans of the Urals: Ethnohistory and identity]. St. Petersburg: MAE RAS Publ., 372 p.
Kropachev, S.A. (2011). [Modern Russian historiography of deportations of the peoples of the USSR during the Great Patriotic War]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo unniversiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University]. No. 23(238), pp. 100–103.
Lefebvre, H. (2015). Proizvodstvo prostranstva [The production of space]. Moscow: Strelka Press, 432 p.
Makalakov, T.Zh. and Shotbakova, L.K. (2022). [Foreign historiography of the problem of adaptation of the peoples of the North Caucasus, forcibly resettled in Kazakhstan in the 40s. XX century]. Vestnik Karagandinskogo universiteta. Sariya: Istoria. Filosofiya [Bulletin of the Karaganda University. «History. Philosophy» series] No. 4(108), pp. 135–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31489/2022hph4/135-141 Plessner, H. (2004). Stupeni organicheskogo i chelovek: vvedenie v filosofskuyu anropologiyu [Levels of organic life and the human: an introduction to philosophical anthropology]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 368 p. Senyavskya, E.S. (1997). Chelovek na voyne. Psikhologo-istoricheskie ocherki [A man at war. Psychological and historical essays]. Moscow: IRH RAS Publ., 232 p.
Urry, J. (2012). Mobil’nosti [Mobilities]. Moscow: Praksis Publ., 576 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
