Family practices of childhood’s protection
Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2015-2-81-87Keywords:
childhood’s protection, family (parental) practices, institutional practices, safe environment, risks, resources, self-defenseAbstract
The analysis of daily parental actions in the field of childhood protection, marked as practices, is presented in the article. Efficiency of process of childhood protection is considered as a result of two different directed processes — an institutionalization and a familization. At the local level this opposition is expressed by the struggle between education, health care, legal protection and social support’s organization and family for resources and influence on the child. By the context of protection childhood’s autonomisation is presented as development of self-protection practicians with the help of family and institutional resources. Data of deep interviews with parents (N =24) form an empirical basis of research. The ideal option of interaction «Family – Institution» is social partnership as a combination of parents’ activity and institutional resources’ support. As the base of other line of interaction («Family – Child») is defined two components — parental support and independence of the child. Style «Adaptation» is presented as optimum option of gradual parental intervention and control’s narrowing due to the child’s training in practicians of safe behavior and self-defense.References
Антонов А.И. Микросоциология семьи: учебник. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2005. 368 с.
Дементьева И.Ф. Социализация детей в семье: теории, факторы, модели. М.: ИС РАН: Генезис, 2004. 231 с.
Забаев И. Образ ребенка у жителей российских мегаполисов. По материалам биографических интервью с россиянами репродуктивного возраста // INTER. 2009. № 5. С. 40–55.
Мертон Р. Социальная теория и социальная структура. М.: АСТ, 2006. 873 с.
Саралиева З.Х. Семья — клиент социальной работы: учеб. пособие. Н.Новгород: ННГУ, 2003. 286 с.
Семья и родительство в современной России / Фонд поддержки детей, находящихся в трудной жизненной ситуации. URL: http://www.fond-detyam.ru (дата обращения: 10.05.2013).
Филипова А.Г. Институт образования как субъект защиты детства // Человек и образование. 2010. № 4. С. 4–9.
Филипова А.Г. Культурно-информационное пространство детства: риски и ресурсы социальной защиты // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2013. Вып. 4. С. 188–197.
Филипова А.Г. Социальная защита детства в современной России: институциональный анализ: автореф. дис. … д-ра социол. наук. Хабаровск, 2013. 44 с.
Чернова Ж., Шпаковская Л. Молодые взрослые: супружество, партнерство и родительство. Дискурсивные предписания и практики в современной России // Laboratorium. 2010. № 3. С. 19–43.
Чернова Ж., Шпаковская Л. Родительство-2010: гражданский активизм и новые солидарности // Cogita!ru. 2010. №28. URL: http://www.cogita.ru/analitka/issledovaniya/roditelstvo-2010-grazhdanskii-aktivizm-i-novye-solidarnosti (дата обращения: 14.02.2015).
Шмидт В. Что приводит защиту детей к успеху или провалу? Как история обусловливает современные проблемы обеспечения прав детей в Чехии и России // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2010. № 3. С. 331–352.
REFERENCES
Antonov A.I. Mikrosotsiologiya sem'i: Uchebnik [Microsociology of family: Textbook]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2005, 368
Dement'yeva I.F. Sotsializatsiya detej v sem'e: teorii, factory, modeli [Children's socialization in family: theories, factors, models]. Moscow, Institute of Sociology of Rusian Academy of Sciences Publ., Genezis Publ., 2004, 231 p. (In Russian).
Zabaev I. [Image of child by Russian metropolises' citizens. Following biographic interviews with the Russians of reproductive age]. INTER [INTER]. 2009, no 5, pp. 40–
Merton R. Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya structura [Social theory and social structure]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2006, 873 p. (In Russian).
Saralieva Z.H. Sem'ya — klient sotsial'noj raboty: Uchebnoe posobie [Family as a social work client: Study guide]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod State University Publ., 2003, 286 p. (In Russian).
[Family and parenthood in modern Russia]. Fond podderzhki detej, nahodyaschihsya v trudnoj zhiznennoj situatsii [Supporting fund for children in hardship]. Available at: http://www.fond-detyam.ru. (Accessed 10.05.2013). (In Russian).
Filipova A.G. [Educational institute as a subject of childhood's protection]. Chelovek i obrazovanie [A man and education]. 2010, no 4, pp. 4–9. (In Russian).
Filipova A.G. [Cultural-informative space of childhood: risks and resourses of social protection]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya «Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sotsiologiya» [Perm University Herald. Series “Philosophy. P2013. No 4 (16), pp. 188-197. (In Russian).
Filipova A.G. Sotsial'naya zaschita detstva v sovremennoj Rossii: institutsional'nyj analiz:Social childhood's protection in modern Russia: institutional analysis: Author’s abstract for procuring of degree of doctor of sociological sciences]. Khabarovsk, 2013, 44 p. (In Russian).
Chernova Zh., Shpakovskaya L. [Young adults: matrimony, partnership, parenthood. Discursive prescripts and practices in modern Russia]. Laboratorium [Laboratorium]. 2010, no 3, pp. 19–43. (In Russian).
Chernova Zh., Shpakovskaya L. [Parenthood-2010: civil activism and new solidarities]. Cogita!ru [Cogita!ru]. 2010, no 28. Available at: http://www.cogita.ru/analitka/issledovaniya/roditelstvo-2010-grazhdanskii-aktivizm-i-novye-solidarnosti (Accessed 14.02.2015). (In Russain).
Shmidt V. [What leads childhood's protection to success or to failure? How history determines contemporary problems of children's rights securing in Czech Republic and Russia]. Zhurnal issledovanij sotsial'noj politiki [The journal of social policy studies]. 2010, no 3, pp. 331–352. (In Russian).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
