Reflexive characteristic adaptations and sociometric status
Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2015-2-55-64Keywords:
five factor theory, self-reflection, reflexive characteristic adaptations, sociometric status, architecture of personalityAbstract
In the context of the five-factor theory (McCrae & Costa, 1996, 2003), the present study addresses the contribution of reflexive characteristic adaptations to the relationship between personality traits and sociometric status of students. In this regard, we conducted an empirical research which employed a sample of 300 undergraduates aged from 17 to 23 years (including 240 women). A set of the Big Five Inventory (John et al., 1991, 2008) modifications were used which measure reflexive characteristic adaptations along with conventional personality traits. The study revealed that extraversion rendered an effect on sociometric status only through attitude toward extraversion. Structural modeling and the analysis of mediations showed that attitude toward extraversion was more important predictor of sociometric status than extraversion itself. We found out that the influence of this predictor went beyond the scope of personality traits themselves as well as other reflexive characteristic adaptations (particularly trait efficacy, meta-traits and meta-attitudes toward traits). Along with positive attitudes toward extraversion, these were positive attitude toward neuroticism and negative attitude toward conscientiousness that predicted an increased sociometric status among undergraduates.References
Андреева Г.М. Социально-психологические аспекты активизации человеческого фактора // Вопросы психологии. 1986. Вып. 3. С. 5–15.
Башаева Е.П. Развитие личностной рефлексии в процессе подготовки будущих бакалавров педагогики: автореф. дис. … канд. пед. наук. Владивосток, 2010. 24 с.
Бухлина Л.Ю. Связь социальной позиции личности в группах членства с социометрическим статусом // Известия ПГПУ им. В.Г. Белинского. 2012. № 28. С. 1161–1166.
Киричук А.В. Положение детей в системе общения в классном коллективе // Проблемы общения и воспитание. Тарту, 1974. Ч. 2. С. 8–17.
Коломинский Я.Л. Психология взаимоотношений в малых группах (общие и возрастные особенности): учеб. пособие. Минск: ТетраСистемс, 2000. 432 с.
Макарова Н.Г. Теоретический аспект саморефлексии личности // Электронный научный журнал «Аpriori». Cер. Гуманитарные науки. 2013. № 1. URL: http://www.apriori-journal.ru/seria1/1-2013/Makarova.pdf (дата обращения: 18.02.2015).
Обозов Н.Н.Динамика межличностных отношений студентов и ее связь с экстраверсией и нейротизмом // Человек и общество / под ред. Б.Г. Ананьева и др. Л., 1973. Вып. 13.С. 149–154.
Первин Л., Джон О. Психология личности: Теория и исследования. М: Аспект-Пресс, 2001. 607 с.
Петровский А.В., Абраменкова В.В. Социальная психология: учебное пособие для студентов пед. институтов. М.: Просвещение, 1987. 224 с.
Попович И.С. Социальные ожидания в теориях мотивации личности // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2014. Вып. 4(20). С. 53–63.
Пьянкова Г.В.Влияние разноуровневых индивидуальных свойств обучающегося на выбор им способов педагогического воздействия: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. Л., 1985. 12 с.
Радько Т.Н., Гребнев Л.С. Обществознание: учеб. пособие. М.: Проспект, 2014. 520 с.
Репина Т.А. Анализ теорий полоролевой социализации в современной западной психологии // Вопросы психологии. 1987. № 3. С. 156–165.
Уманский Л.И. Личность. Организаторская деятельность. Коллектив: Избранные труды. Кострома: Изд-во Костром. гос. ун-та, 2001. 432 с.
Хархордин О.В.Градации близости в современной российской дружбе // Дружба: очерки теории практик. СПб.: Изд-во ЕУ СПб. 2009. С. 48–81.
Шибутани Т. Социальная психология. М.: АСТ; Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 1999. 539 с.
Щебетенко С.А. Рефлексивные адаптации характера в пятифакторной теории личности (в печати).
Ajzen I.The theory of planned behavior // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991. Vol.50(2). P.179–211.
Anderson C., John O.P., Keltner D., Kring A.M. Who attains social status? Effects of personality traits and physical attractiveness in social groups // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. Vol.116–132.
Cervone D. The architecture of personality // Psychological Review. 2004. Vol.111183–204.
Furnham A., Walker J. The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference // Personality and Individual Differences. 2001.31997–1017.
Izard C.E. Personality correlates of sociometric status // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1959. Vol. 43(2).89–
Goldberg L.R. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons // Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage,141–
John O.P., Donahue E.M., Kentle R.L. The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991.
Tong S.T., Van Der Heide B., Langwell L., Walther J.B. Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008.531–549.
McCrae R.R., Costa Jr.P.T. Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model / J.S. Wiggins (Ed.). The Five-factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 1996. P. 51–87.
McCrae R.R., Costa Jr.P.T. Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2003. 271
Shchebetenko S. “The best man in the world”: Attitudes toward personality traits // Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2014. Vol. 11(3). P. 129–148.
Swami V., Malpass F., Havard D., Benford K., Costescu A., Sofitiki A., Taylor D. Metalheads: The influence of personality and individual differences on preference for heavy metal // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2013. Vol. 7(4). P. 377–383.
REFERENCES
Andreeva G.M. [Social and psychological aspects of human factor activization]. Voprosy psihologii [Issues of psychology]. 1986, no 3, pp. 5–
Bashaeva V.P. Razvitie lichnostnoj refleksii v protsesse podgotovki buduschih bakalavrov pedagogiki:Author’s abstract for procuring of degree of candidate of pedagogical sciences]. Vladivostok, 2010, 24 p. (In Russian).
Buhlina L.Yu. [Personal social status connection in the reference groups with sociometric status]. Izvestiya PGPU im. V.G. Belinskogo [Tidings of Penza State Peedagogical University named after V.G.Belinsky]. 2012, no 28, pp. 1161–
Kirichuk A.V. [Children's status in communication system in the class]. Problemy obscheniya i vospitanie. Ch. 2 [Problems of communication and upbringing. Part 2]. Tartu, 1974, pp. 8–17. (In Russian).
Koloinsky Ya.L. Psihologiya vzaimootnoshenij v malyh gruppah (obschie i vozrastnye osobennosti): Uchebnoe posobie [Psychology of interrelations in small groups (general and age peculiarities): Study guide]. Minsk, TetraSistems Publ., 2000, 432
Makarova N.G. [Theoretical aspect of personality's self-reflection]. Elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal «Apriori. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki» [Online scientific journal «Apriori. Series: Humanities»]. 2013, no 1. Available at: http://www.apriori-journal.ru/seria1/1-2013/Makarova.pdf. (In Russian).
Obozov N.N. [Interpersonal relations' among students dynamics and its connection with neuroticism and extraversion]. Chelovek i obschestvo. Vyp. 13 [A man and society. Ed. 13]. Leningrad, 1973, pp. 149–154. (In Russian).
Pervin L., John O. Psihologiya lichnosti: teoriya i issledovaniya [Psychology of personality: theory and research]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 2001, 607 p. (In Russian).
Petrovskij A.V., Abramenkova V.V. Sotsial'naya psihologiya: Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov pedinstitutov [Social psychology: Study guide for students of pedagogical universities]. Moscow, Prosveschenie Publ., 1997, 224
Popovich I.S. [Social expectations in the theories of motivation of personality]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya «Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sotsiologiya» [Perm University Herald. Series “Philosophy. P
P'yankova G.V. Vliyanie raznourovnevyh individual'nyh svojstv obuchayuschegosya na vybor im sposobov pedagogicheskogo vozdejstviya: [Influence of split-level individual features of a student on his choice of pedagogic actions: Author’s abstract for procuring of degree of candidate]. Leningrad, 1985, 12 p. (In Russian).
Rad'ko T.N., Grebnev L.S. Obschestvoznanie: Uchebnoe posobie [Social science: Study guide]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2014, 520 p. (In Russian).
Repina T.A. [Analysis of sex-role socialization theories in modern western psychology]. Voprosy psihologii [Issues of psychology]. 1987, no 3, pp. 156–165. (In Russian).
Umanskij L.I. Lichnost'. Organizatorskaya deyatel'nost'. Kollektiv: Izbrannye trudy [Personality. Managerial activity. Collective: Selected works]. Kostroma, Kostroma State University Publ., 2001, 432 p. (In Russian).
Harhordin O.V. [Intimacy gradations in modern Russian friendship]. Druzhba: ocherki teorii praktik [Friendship: sketches of theory of praxis]. Saint Petersburg, EUS Pb Publ., 2009, pp. 48–81. (In Russian).
Shibutani T. Sotsial'naya psihologiya [Social psychology]. Moscow, AST Publ., Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 1999, 539 p. (In Russian).
Shchebetenko S.A. (passed for printing) Refleksivnye adaptatsii haraktera v pyatifaktornoj teorii lichnosti [Reflexive characteristic adaptations in five-factor theory of personality]. (In Russian).
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991. Vol. 50(2). P. 179–211.
Anderson C., John O. P., Keltner D., Kring A.M. Who attains social status? Effects of personality traits and physical attractiveness in social groups // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. Vol. 81.P. 116–132.
Cervone D. The architecture of personality // Psychological Review. 2004. Vol. 111(1). P. 183–204.
Furnham A., Walker J. The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference // Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. Vol. 31(6). P. 997–1017.
Izard C.E. Personality correlates of sociometric status // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1959. Vol. 43(2).P. 89–93.
Goldberg L.R. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons // Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage,141–
John O.P., Donahue E.M., Kentle R.L. The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991.
Tong S.T., Van Der Heide B., Langwell L., Walther J.B. Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008. 531–549.
McCrae R.R., Costa Jr.P.T. Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model / J.S. Wiggins (Ed.). The Five-factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 1996. P. 51–87.
McCrae R.R., Costa Jr.P.T. Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2003. 271
Shchebetenko S. “The best man in the world”: Attitudes toward personality traits // Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2014. Vol. 11(3). P. 129–148.
Swami V., Malpass F., Havard D., Benford K., Costescu A., Sofitiki A., Taylor D. Metalheads: The influence of personality and individual differences on preference for heavy metal // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2013. Vol. 7(4). P. 377–383.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
