Culture and civilization: the problem of relationship. Historical and theoretical and methodological aspects

Philosophy

Authors

  • Evgeniya Vladimirovna Kuznetsova Naberezhnye Chelny Branch of the University of Management «TISBI», 10, Tatarstan str., Naberezhnye Chelny, 423825, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2015-2-19-24

Keywords:

civilization, culture, functions of civilization, technic, person, unification, organization, adaptation

Abstract

The subject of paper is relationship between culture and civilization and functions of civilization. The relevance of the article is determined by the peculiarities of modern civilization and remaking of moral values and attitudes. Meanwhile, the concepts of «civilization» and «culture» are the most complicated and controversial in modern humanities, and methodological distinction of these concepts would help in revealing of many socio-cultural phenomena and processes. The paper’s author uses historical and comparative research methods, which, in the opinion of the author, help to get the most adequate results. The author gives views of famous philosophers and highlight five key differences between the concepts of «civilization» and «culture». Culture and civilization are not opposite towards each other, but they are different in nature. Culture is a creation, it’s basically individual; civilization is a transition from the creation (culture) to the acquisition and conservation of cultural results for everybody. Without culture there is no civilization, which is its natural and necessary extension, it allows to replicate cultural patterns and to create conditions for further creation in the form of stabilization of social relations for future generations. So, civilization as a sustainable socio-cultural formation realizes various functions. The author defines the following functions of civilization, such as: adaptive, regulatory, unifying, repressive. If we compare functional features of civilization, peculiarities of culture and civilization we come to the conclusion that civilization influences on the person externally. In civilization a person is an object, individual, one among many people. Culture influences on a person also, but a person is not only an object in it, it’s a subject, which creates through his internal potential and contrary to existing civilizational norms. A struggle between external influence on a person expressed in various regulations, and his internal potential contribute to the development of a man. In the context of functional characteristic features of civilization civilization is a necessary condition for the development of culture and human development.

Author Biography

Evgeniya Vladimirovna Kuznetsova , Naberezhnye Chelny Branch of the University of Management «TISBI», 10, Tatarstan str., Naberezhnye Chelny, 423825, Russia

Ph.D., Chief of Human Sciences Department

References

БердяевН.А. Философия неравенства. М.: ИМА-пресс, 1990. 288с.

ГердерИ.Г. Идеи к философии истории человечества. М.: Наука, 1977. 703 с.

КаганМ.С. Системный подход и гуманитарное знание: избр. статьи. Л.: ЛГУ, 1991. 384с.

Кант И. Основы метафизики нравственности // Критика практического разума. СПб.: Наука, 2005. С.55–119.

Келле В.Ж., Ковальзон М.Я. Теория и история. Проблемы теории исторического процесса. М.: Политиздат, 1981. 288 с.

Кузнецова Е.В. Феномен массовой культуры: проблемы и противоречия // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2013. Вып. 3(15). С. 89–95.

Руссо Ж.-Ж. Трактаты. М.: Дашков и К., 2012.

Фергюсон А. Опыт истории гражданского общества. М.: Политиздат, 1988. 285 с.

ЭнгельсФ. Положение рабочего класса в Англии // МарксК., ЭнгельсФ. Соч. Т.2. М.: Изд-во полит. Лит/, 1955. С.231–517.

REFERENCES

Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya neravenstva [Philosophy of inequality]. Moscow, IMA-Press Publ., 1990, 288

Gerder I.G. Idei k filosofii istorii chelovechestva [Ideas on philosophy of a mankind]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977, 703 (In Russian).

Kagan S. Sistemnyj podhod i gumanitarnoe znanie: Izbrannye stat’i [System approach and humanities knowledge: Selected articles]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University, 1991, 384 p. (In Russian).

Kant I. [The metaphysics of morals] Kritika prakticheskogo razuma [The critique of practical reason]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, 2005, pp. 55–119. (In Russian).

Kelle V.Zh. Teoriya i istoriya. Problemy teorii istoricheskogo protsessa [Theory and history. Problems of historical process theory]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1981, 288 p. (In Russian).

Kuznetsova E.V. [Phenomenon of mass culture: problems and controversies]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya «Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Series “Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology”]. 2013. Iss. 3(15). Pp. 89–95. (In Russian).

Rousseau J.-J. Traktaty [Tractates]. Moscow, Dashkov i K Publ., 2012. (In Russian).

Ferguson A. Opyt istorii grazhdanskogo obschestva [Essay on the history of the civil society]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1988, 285

Engels F. [The condition of the working class in England]. Marks K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya. T. 2 [Marx K., Engels F. Oeuvre. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury Publ., 1955, pp. 231–517. (In Russian).

Published

2015-06-30