Virtual intersubjectivity: the social and existential aspects of the analysis

Philosophy

Authors

  • Dina Mikhailovna Sokolova Saratov State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky, 83, Astrakhanskaya str., Saratov, 410012, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2015-3-50-56

Keywords:

intersubjectivity, substantiality, intersubjective sociality, substantial sociality, communication, social communication, virtual subject, virtual intersubjectivity

Abstract

In this article the phenomena of virtual subject and virtual intersubjectivity are considered. For the analysis of modern society the author applies to the categories introduced into philosophy by E. Husserl and his follower A. Schutz. The concept of intersubjectivity has been used by E. Husserl to explain the interaction between individuals — monads. A. Schutz continued working in this direction and adapted this concept to the analysis of social reality. Today the specifics of social communications are changing. Therefore, the categorical system of phenomenology needs to be adjusted. One of the contemporary trends is virtualization. The significant transformation of the fundamentals of social life is a distinctive feature of virtualization of the sociality in the information period. For example, a new principle of network organization is being developed in the virtual world. Now this principle is extended to the social structures that exist in reality.

Author Biography

Dina Mikhailovna Sokolova , Saratov State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky, 83, Astrakhanskaya str., Saratov, 410012, Russia

Ph.D. in Philosophy, Person charged with informationand organization work of Faculty of Philosophy,Postgraduate Student of Department of Social communications

References

Аршинов В.И., Лебедев М.В. Европейская субъективность и виртуальный субъект постнеклассической науки // Вопросы искусственного интеллекта. 2008. № 1. С. 27–41.

Гуссерль Э. Картезианские рассуждения. СПб.: Наука, 1998. 315 с.

Кляйненберг Э. Жизнь соло: Новая социальная реальность. М.: Альпина нон-фикшн, 2014. 279 с.

Резник Ю.М. Понятие «социальное» в современной философии и науке // Вопросы социальной теории. 2008. Т. II, вып. 1(2). С. 88–111.

Свасьян К.А. Феноменологическое познание. Пропедевтика и критика. М.: Академ. проспект: Альма Матер, 2010. 206 с.

Слинин А.Я. Феноменология интерсубъективности. СПб.: Наука, 2004. 356 с.

Шюц А. Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия, 2004. 1056 с.

REFERENCES

Arshinov V.I., Lebedev M.V. [European subjectivity and virtual postnonclassical science subject] Voprosy iskusstvennogo intellekta [The issues of artificial intelligence]. 2008, no 1, pp. 27–41. (In Russian).

Husserl E. Kartezianskie rassuzhdenija [Cartesian meditations]. Saint-Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1998, 315 p. (In Russian).

Klinenberg E. Zhizn’ solo: Novaja social’naja real’nost’ [Going solo: the extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone]. Moscow, Alpina non-fikshn Publ., 2014, 279 p. (In Russian).

Reznik Yu.M. [The concept “social” in recent philosophy and science] Voprosy social’noj teorii [Issues of the social theory], 2008, vol. 2, no 1(2), pp. 88–111. (In Russian).

Svasyan K.A. Fenomenologicheskoe poznanie. Propedevtika i kritika [Phenomenological cognition. Propaedeutics and criticism] Moscow, Akademicheskij prospect Publ., 2010, 206 p. (In Russian).

Slinin A.Ja. Fenomenologija intersubektivnosti [The phenomenology of intersubjectivity]. Saint-Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2004, 356 p. (In Russian).

Schutz A. Izbrannoe: Mir, svetjashhijsja smyslom [Selectas: the world glowing by sense]. Moscow, Russian political encyclopedia Publ., 1056 p. (In Russian).

Published

2015-09-30