The problem of the scientific view of the world’s structure
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2015-3-32-40Keywords:
scientific view of the world, structure, functions, knowledge, evaluation, concept imageAbstract
This article specifies the questions of maintenance of different views of the world and, foremost, scientific view of the world, which plugs in itself the great number of withstand theories, which in the aggregate describe, explain and predict development. Any view of the world is a representative of some fragment of the combined natural and social reality. The view of the world organized properly in the process of spiritual (theoretical) activity substitutes for one or another cut of life and thereby converts it into the subject matter of research idea. The view of the world is called an ideal appearance to substitute for that reality in which live a man has to live. This substitution allows a subject to produce such operations with this second reality, which are impossible with the primary reality or with reality in itself. Any view of the world (including scientific) is conditioned by requirements, interests and ideals of man in cognition, estimation and orientation of subject. Through necessities, interests and ideals the subject world, humanified nature gets into the spiritual world (world of reflections) and forms it. Specifying distinctions between science and scientific view of the world, on can see in science the integral phenomenon of more volume and dynamic order as compared to the scientific view of the world, which is more steady and inertial. Modern structure of scientific view of the world can not be reduced only to the natural sciences’ and to social and humane one. In it is certainly necessary to include the technical view of the world in it. Our society is becoming more and more technogeneous, which creates epistemological and social-axiological pre-conditions for strengthening of intensions of technological determinism in different aspects.References
Барышев М.А., Каширин В.П., Пфаненштиль И.А. Философия техники: учеб. пособие. Красноярск: Сибир. федер. ун-т, Политехн. ин-т, 2007. 156 с.
Бергер Я.М.,Левит С.Я.,Мильская Л.Т. Макс Вебер. Избранное.Образ общества / пер. с нем. М.: Юрист,1994. 704 с.
Булычев И.И. О взаимосвязи эмоций с оценками и знаниями, образами и понятиями // Актуальные проблемы современной когнитивной науки: материалы Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Иваново: ОАО «Иваново», 2010. С. 188–190.
Булычев И.И. Философские вопросы гендеристики (гендерологии). Иваново: Иванов. гос. архитектур.-строит. ун-т, 2011. 320 с.
Каширин В.П. Философские вопросы технологии: Социол., методол. и техновед. аспекты / под ред. В.А. Дмитриенко; Томский политехн. ин-т им. С.М. Кирова, Филос. о-во СССР. Томск: Изд-во Томского ун-та, 1988. 285 с.
Павленко А.Н.Мартин Хайдеггер: Сущность современной техники. URL: http://humanities.edu.ru/db/msg/46577 (дата обращения: 24.11.2003).
ПланкМ. Единство физической картины мира: сб. статей; отв. ред.Б.Г.Кузнецов; сост.У.И.Франкфурт;АН СССР, Ин-т соц.-эконом. проблем. М.: Наука, 1966. 287с.
СадохинА.П. Концепции современного естествознания: учебник для студентов вузов, обучающихся по гуманитарным специальностям и специальностям экономики и управления. 17-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ЮНИТИ-ДАНА, 2013. 239с.
СтепинВ.С.Картина мира и ее функции в научном исследовании // Научная картина мира: логико-гносеологический аспект. Киев, 1983. С.80–103.
УшаковЕ.В. Введение в философию и методологию науки: учебник. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Кнорус, 2008. 592 с.
REFERENCES
Baryshev M.A., Kashirin V.P., Pfanenshtil’ I.A. Filosofiya tehniki: Uchebnoe posobie [Philosophy of technics: Study guide]. Krasnoyarsk, Siberian Federal University Publ., Politechnical Institute Publ., 2007, 156 p. (In Russian).
Berger Ya.M., Levit S.Ya., Mil’skaya L.T. Maks Weber. Izbrannoe. Obraz obschestva [Max Veber. Selectas. Image of society]. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1994, 704 p. (In Russian).
Bulychev I.I. [On connection between emotions and estimations, knowledge, images and notions]. Aktual’nye problemy sovremennoj kognitivnoj nauki. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii [Timely problems of modern cognitive science. Proceedings of international research and practice conference]. Ivanovo, OAO Ivanovo Publ., 2010, pp. 188–190. (In Russian).
Bulychev I.I. Filosofskie voprosy genderistiki (genderologii) [Philosophic issues of genderistics (gender studies)]. Ivanovo, Ivanovo State Architectural and Engineering University, 2011, 320 p. (In Russian).
Kashirin V.P. Filosofskie voprosy tehnologii (Sotsiologicheskie, metodologicheskie i tehnovedcheskie aspekty) [Philosophical issues of technology (sociological, methodological and technical science aspects)]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 1988, 285
Pavlenko A.N. Martin Haidegger: Suschnost’ sovremennoj tehniki [Martin Heidegger: Essence of modern technics]. Available at: http://humanities.edu.ru/db/msg/46577. (Accessed 24.11.2003). (In Russian).
Planck M. Edinstvo fizicheskoj kartiny mira: Sbornik statej [Consonance of physical picture of the world: Collection of articles]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966, 287 p. (In Russian).
Sadohin A.P. Kontseptsii sovremwnnogo estestvoznaniya: Uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayuschihsya po gumanitarnym spetsial’nostyam i spetsial’nostyam ekonomiki i upravleniya [Concepts of modern natural science: Textbook for higher educational institutions’ students of humane and economics and management major]. Moscow, YUNITI-DANA Publ., 2013, 239 p. (In Russian).
Stepin V.S. [Picture of the world and its functions in a scientific research]. Nauchnaya kartina mira: logiko-gnoseologicheskiy aspect [Scientific picture of the world: logical-gnoseological aspect]. Kiev, 1983, pp. 80–103. (In Russian).
Ushakov E.V. Vvedenie v filosofiyu i metodologiyu nauki: Uchebnik [Introduction into philosophy and methodology of science: Textbook]. Moscow, Knorus Publ., 2008, 592 p. (In Russian).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.