Subject supposed to believe and nation as a zero institution
PHILOSOPHY
Keywords:
Neo-Marxism, ideology, ideological interpellation, subject, nation, compulsionAbstract
In the following text, we try to systemise the results of different theoretical elaborations which become the part of vividly changing historical conjunctures of the past decades, were led, by the intertwining logics of theoretical work and historical practices, to articulate themselves around Althusser’s concept of ideological interpellation. Whatever theoretical effects our efforts may have hopefully produced, they have been attempted from within a rather heterogeneous set of practices, and were trying to think, that is, to «organise» in the intellectual and in the political sense, our historical commitments and struggles of the past decades upon a theoretical background where the powerful theoretical apparatus legated by Althusser’s re-interpretation of historical materialism had a prominent place. While, during the brilliant marches of the eighties, when, at each step, the historical process seemed to overtake the sparkling phrase, we might have been lulled into self-blinding complacence, we have now been cruelly crushed back onto the earth, wondering why the eighteenth Brumaire so obstinatelly follows different SpringsReferences
Список литературы
Davidson D. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme // Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. P. 183– 198.
Douglas M. How Institutions Think. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987. 146 p.
Ducrot O. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit, 1984. 237 p.
Evans-Pritchard E. Magic, Witchcraft and Oracles among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1937. 558 p.
Freud S. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (24 vols.). The Institute of Psycho-Analysis. London: Hogarth Press, 1953–1974.
Goody J. The Interface between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 331 p.
Lacan J. Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. Seminaire XI. Paris: Seuil, 1973. 255 p.
Levi-Strauss C. Le sorcier et sa magie // Antropologie structurale I. Paris: Plon, 1958. P. 205–226.
Mannoni O. Clefs pour l’imaginaire. Paris: Seuil, 1969. 321 p.
Merton R.K. The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy // Social Theory and Social Structure. New York; London: Free Press, 1968. P. 421–436.
Močnik R. Der 18. Brumaire des östlichen Frühlings // Krieg in Europa. Gaisbacher, Kaser, Promitzer, Sax, Schogler, hg. Graz: DIPA-sandkorn, 1992.
Močnik R. Die Machtmechanismen des ubergangs // A. Bremer. Jugoslawische (Sch)Erben. Osnabruck; Munster: Fibre, 1993.
Močnik R. From Historical Marxisms to Historical Materialism: Toward the Theory of Ideology // Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal. 1991. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 117–137.
Močnik R. Ideology and Fantasy // The Althusserian Legacy. E.A. Kaplan and M. Sprinker, eds. London; New York: Verso, 1993. P. 139–156.
Močnik R. Marcel Mauss — klasik humanistike // M. Mauss. Esej o daruin drugi spici. Ljubljana: Studia humanitatis, 1996. S. 267–303.
Močnik R. Penser, aujurd’hui // Lignes. 1993. № 21, Septembre.
Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965. 186 p.
Quine W.V.O. Word and Object. Cambridge: Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1960. 294 p.
Rosenthal J. What is Life?: A Habermas Critique // Social Science Information. 1992. Vol. 31, № 1. P. 5–42.
Weber M. Economy and Society. Berkele: University of California Press, 1978. Vol. 1. 1469 p.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.