Observation in qualitative sociology
Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2016-3-129-134Keywords:
qualitative sociology, observation, typical situation, life world, inner time, social cognition, freedom, the principle of complementarityAbstract
Observation in qualitative research is defined as the understanding of social life of a variety of communities based on the behavior of people in physical space and time. It includes, on the one hand, the perception of what is happening directly (speech, gestures, bodily movement), on the other hand, is the understanding (interpretation) of the meaning a particular social situation, invisibly present in what is happening directly. Reliance on ideas of A. Schutz allows included and excluded observations correlate with two parallel ways of human existence: as unique individuals with communicating, although never transparent to the end internal worlds, and of people as social types whose behavior can be understood in the framework of typical social situations. In the first case, the observer and the observable characters live in a common space and a common internal time (Henri Bergson), the observer participates in the life process of the community, he catches the thoughts of others, has common hopes, worries and plans for the future. His biography and life experiences become part of the biographies and life experience of others. In the latter case, the unification of the inner worlds of people and their behavior, and then to understand the behavior of another person is enough to determine how it should behave as the type.References
Бергер П. Приглашение в социологию. Гуманистическая перспектива. М.: Аспект-Пресс, 1996. 168 с.
Гарфинкель Г. Исследования по этнометодологии. СПб.: Питер, 2007. 335 с.
Лотман Ю.М. Культура и взрыв // Лотман Ю.М. Семиосфера. СПб.: Искусство-СПб, 2010. С. 12–148.
Ненашев М.И. Методы исследований в качественной социологии. Киров: Радуга-Пресс, 2016. 134 с.
Ненашев М.И. Особенности социологического наблюдения // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2016. Вып. 2(26). С. 111–119. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2016-2-111-119.
Семенова В.В. Качественные методы: введение в гуманистическую социологию. М.: Добросвет, 1998. 292 с.
Щюц А. Обыденная и научная интерпретация человеческого действия // Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом. М.: Рос. полит. энцикл., 2004. С. 7–179.
REFERENCES
Berger P. Priglashenie v sotsiologiyu. Gumanisticheskaya perspektiva [Invitation to sociology. Humanistic perspective]. Moscow, Aspent-Press Publ., 1996, 168 p. (In Russian).
Garfinkel H. Issledovaniya po etnometodologii [Studies in ethnomethodology]. Saint Petersburg.: Piter Publ., 2007, 335 p. (In Russian).
Lotman Y.M. [Culture and explosion]. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. Saint Petersburg, Iskusstvo Publ., 2010, pp. 12–148. (In Russian).
Nenashev M.I. Metody issledovaniya v kachestvennoj psihologii [Research methods in qualiitative sociology]. Kirov, Raduga-Press Publ., 2016, 134 p. (In Russian).
Nenashev M.I. [Peculiarities of sociological observations] Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. 2016, iss. 2(26), pp.111–119. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2016-2-111-119 (In Russian).
Semenova V.V. Kachestvennye metody: vvedenie v gumanisticheskuyu sotsiologiyu [Qualitative methods: an introduction to humanist sociology]. Moscow, Dobrosvet Publ., 1998, 292 p. (In Russian).
Schütz
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.