The specificity of the sociological observation
Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2016-2-111-119Keywords:
sociological observation, physical space and time, social space, social reality, non-standardised observation participant observation, standardised observation, uninvolved observation, sociometric survey, selectivity of observation, the understanding, measurement, theoryAbstract
The article reveals a logical vulnerability of definitions of sociological observation in domestic literature, which actually also suitable for observation in physics, astronomy, biology, and focuses on the characteristics of observation as a method of knowledge in sociology. Sociological observation in a broad sense, in the form of fixing the position of affairs in society by means of a questionnaire, interview, content analysis or any other method, and sociological observation itself, is perceived when the behavior of people in physical space and time to define their relationships in the social space distinguished are. Probabilistic nature of this method of study is noted. Analysing the specific situation of sociological observation, it is shown that the observation is capable with any degree of accuracy to replace polling methods, in particular, such as sociometric survey or questionnaire.It is indicated that the problem of the influence of the act of observation on the observed situation is actually lifted by the transformation of this act in familiar and routine procedure to observe. Much more important is the inevitable problem of selective observation, which is dictated by the fact that the theory that guides the researcher determines what he sees as reality. It is shown that the solution to this problem is seen in the way of synthesis the paintings of reality that are defined by different theoretical settings, up to mutually exclusive, and relying on common sense.References
Бурдье П. Социальное пространство и символическая власть // Альманах THESIS. 1993. Т. 1, вып. 2. С. 137–150.
Готлиб А.С.Введение в социологическое исследование. Качественный и количественный подходы. Методология. Исследовательские практики: учеб. пособие. М.: Флинта: МПСИ, 2005. 384 с.
Ненашев М.И. Методы исследований в количественной социологии. Киров: Радуга-Пресс, 2016. 267 с.
Семенова В.В. Качественные методы: введение в гуманистическую социологию. М.: Добросвет, 1998. 289 с.
Современная западная философия: Словарь. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ТОН – Остожье, 1998. 544 с.
Ядов В.А. Социологическое исследование: методология, программа, методы. Гл. IV: Методы сбора данных. § 1. Прямое наблюдение. URL: http://www.socioline.ru (дата обращения: 22.01.2016).
References
Bourdieu P. [Social space and symbolic power]. Al’manah THESIS [Almanac THESIS]. 1993, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 137–150. (In Russian).
Gottlieb A.S. Vvedenie v sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie. Kachestvennyj i kolichestvennyj podhody. Metodologiya. Issledovatel’skie praktiki: uchebnoe posobie [Introduction to sociological research. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Methodology. Research practice: tutorial]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., MPSI Publ., 2005, 384 p. (In Russian).
Nenashev M.I. Metody issledovaniya v kolichestvennoj psihologii [Research methods in quantitative sociology]. Kirov, Raduga-Press Publ., 2016, 267 p. (In Russian).
Semenova V.V. Kachestvennye metody: vvedenie v gumanisticheskuyu sotsiologiyu [Qualitative methods: an introduction to humanist sociology]. Moscow: Dobrosvet Publ., 1998, 289 p. (In Russian).
Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya: Slovar’ [Modern Western philosophy: Dictionary]. Moscow, TONE – Ostozh’e Publ., 1998, 544 p. (In Russian).
Yadov V.A. Sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie: metodologiya, programma, metody. Gl. 4. Metody sbora dannyh. § 1. Pryamoe nablyudenie [Sociological research: methodology, program, methods. Ch. IV. Methods of data collection. § 1. Direct observation]. Available at: http://www.socioline.ru (accesed 22.01.2016). (In Russian).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.