Correlation of cope-strategies, locus of control and motivation of achievement at managers
Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2018-4-541-549Keywords:
coping strategy, achievement motivation, internality, externality, locus of control, responsibility, adaptability, disadaptation, managersAbstract
The article focuses on the theoretical and empirical analysis of the concepts of coping strategy, locus of control (internality-externality), and achievement motivation. Different points of view on coping strategies are considered, as well as achievement motivation and internality as professionally important characteristics of managers of the real sector of the economy. The structure of the interrelation between sociopsychological characteristics and coping strategies of managers is revealed. The correlations between coping strategies, locus of control, and achievement motivation have been studied. The results of the study of the relationship between coping strategies, locus of control and achievement motivation among managers made it possible to draw the following conclusions. Firstly, the higher the level of motivation for success, the greater the likelihood is that a person will use such coping strategies as planning of a solution to the problem, positive reassessment and problem-oriented coping. Secondly, the higher the level of motivation for avoiding failures, the more likely it is that a person, in the process of coping, will resort to such strategies as distancing, escape-avoidance, emotionally-oriented coping. Thirdly, the higher the level of the internal locus of control, the greater the probability of using such coping strategies as problem-solving planning, positive reassessment, and problem-oriented coping. Finally, the higher the level of the external locus of control, the greater the likelihood is of using such coping strategies as distancing, flight-avoidance, emotionally-oriented coping.References
Анцыферова Л.И. Личность в трудных жизненных условиях: переосмысливание, преобразование ситуаций и психологическая защита // Психологический журнал Т. 15, № 1. 1994. С. 3–19.
Волкова Н.В. Coping strategies как условие формирования идентичности // Мир психологии. 2004. № 2(38). С. 119–124.
Гордеева Т.О. Мотивация достижения: теории, исследования, проблемы. // Современная психология мотивации / под ред. Д.А. Леонтьева. М.: Смысл, 2002. С. 47–102.
Крюкова Т.Л. Методы изучения совладающего поведения: три копинг-шкалы. 2-е изд., испр., доп. Кострома: КГУ им. Н.А. Некрасова: Авантитул, 2010. 64 с.
Кудашев А.Р. Диалогические и коммуникационные компетенции менеджеров: социально-психологические аспекты // Международный научно-практический семинар «Психология диалога и мир человека». 2015. № 1(33). С. 63–69.
Муздыбаев К. Психология ответственности. Л.: Наука, 1983. 240 с.
Нартова-Бочавер С.К. «Coping behavior» в системе понятий психологии личности // Психологический журнал. 1997. Т. 18, № 5. С. 20–30.
Практическая психодиагностика. Методики и тесты: учеб. пособие / ред.-сост. Д.Я. Райгородский. Самара: Изд. дом «БАХРАХ-М», 2001. 672 с.
Психология адаптации личности. Анализ. Теория. Практика / ред. А.А. Реан, А.Р. Кудашев, А.А. Баранов. СПб.: ПРАЙМ-ЕВРОЗНАК, 2006. 479 с.
Реан А.А. Проблемы и перспективы развития концепции локуса контроля личности // Психологический журнал. 1998. Т. 19, № 4. С. 3–11.
Реан А.А. Психология изучения личности: учеб. пособие. СПб.: Изд-во В.Л. Михайлова, 1999. 288 с.
Cohen F. Measurement of coping // Stress and Coping: An Anthology / ed. by A. Monat, R.S. Lazarus. N.Y., 1991. P. 228–244. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-197309000-00002.
Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. The concept of coping // Stress and Coping: An Anthology / ed. by A. Monat, R.S. Lazarus. N.Y., 1991. P. 189–206. DOI: 10.1017/s0141347300015019.
McClelland D., Atkinson J.W., Clark R.A., Lowell E.L. The achievement motive. N.Y., 1976. 386 p. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139878289.009.
Murray H.A. Explorations in personality. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1938. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305067.001.0001.
Rotter G.В. Generalized expectances for internal versus external control of reinforcement // Psychological monographs. 1966. Vol. 80, no. 1. P. 1–28. DOI: 10.1037/h0092976.
References
Antsyferova, L.I. (1994). Lichnost v trudnykh zhiznennykh usloviyakh: pereosmyslivanie, preobrazovanie situatsii i psikhologicheskaya zaschita [Personality in difficult living conditions: re-thinking, transformation of situations and psychological defense]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal]. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–19.
Cohen F. (1991). Measurement of coping. Stress and Coping: An Anthology, ed. by A. Monat, R.S. Lazarus. New York, pp. 228–244. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-197309000-00002.
Gordeeva, T.O. (2002). Motivatsiya dostizheniya: teorii, issledovaniya, problemy [Motivation of achievement: theory, research, problems]. Sovremennaya psikhologiya motivatsii / pod red. D.A. Leonteva [Modern psychology of motivation, ed. by D.A. Leont’ev]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., pp. 47–102.
Kryukova, T. L. (2010). Metody izucheniya sovladayuschego povedeniya: tri koping-shkaly [Methods of studying coping behavior: three copyscales]. Kostroma: KSU named after N.A. Nekrasova Publ., Avantitul Publ., 64 p.
Kudashev, A.R. (2015). Dialogicheskie i kommunikatsionnye kompetentsii menedzherov: sotsialnopsikhologicheskie aspekty [Dialogic and communication competence of managers: socio-psychological aspects]. Mezhdunarodniy nauchno-prakticheskiy seminar «Psikhologija dialoga i mir cheloveka» [International scientific-practical seminar «Psychology of dialogue and the world of man»]. No. 1(33), pp. 63–69.
Lazarus, R.S. and Folkman, S. (1991). The concept of coping. Stress and Coping: An Anthology, ed. by A. Monat, R.S. Lazarus. New York, pp. 189–206. DOI: 10.1017/s0141347300015019
McClelland, D. et al. (1976). The achievement motive. New York, 386 p. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139878289.009.
Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305067.001.0001.
Muzdybaev, K. (1938). Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti [Psychology of responsibility] Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 240 p.
Nartova-Bochaver, S.K. (1997). «Coping behavior» v sisteme ponyatiy psihologii lichnosti [«Coping behavior» in the system of concepts of personality psychology]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal]. Vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 20–30.
Raygorodskiy, D.Ya. (ed.). (2001). Prakticheskaya psikhodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy [Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and tests]. Samara: BAHRAH-M Publ., 672 p.
Rean, A.A. (1998). Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya kontseptsii lokusa kontrolya lichnosti [Problems and perspectives of development of the concept of the locus of personality control]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal]. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3–11.
Rean, A.A. (1999). Psihologiya izucheniya lichnosti [Psychology of the study of personality]. St. Petersburg: V.L. Mihaylov’s Publ., 288 с.
Rean A.A., Kudashev A.R. and Baranov A.A. (ed.). (2006). Psikhologiya adaptatsii lichnosti. Analiz. Teoriya. Praktika [Psychology of personality adaptation. Analysis. Theory. Practice]. St. Petersburg: PRAYM-EVROZNAK Publ., 479 p.
Rotter, G.В. (1966). Generalized expectances for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs. Vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1–28. DOI: 10.1037/h0092976.
Volkova, N.V. (2004). Coping strategies kak uslovie formirovaniya identichnosti [Coping strategies as a condition for the formation of identity]. Mir psikhologii [The World of Psychology]. No. 2(38), pp. 119–124.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
