Essence, prerequisites and self-identification of transhumanism movement
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2018-3-352-363Keywords:
transhumanism, techno-progressivism, posthuman, transhuman, humanism, bioethics, ethics of science, NBIC-technologies, extropianism, libertarianism, democratic transhumanism, political philosophyAbstract
Theoretical concepts and manifestations of transhumanism require adequate assessment from the perspective ofmodern scientific philosophy. This study aims to determine the essence of transhumanism, to identify its main objective (socio-economic) and theoretical prerequisites, and to show the connection of transhumanism with other branches of philosophy, science, social and political thought. The article provides a general description of transhumanism as a direction of thought and a social movement, which is done with the consideration of both self-definitions of transhumanism thinkers and criticism toward them. The author attempts to obtain a new complex definition of transhumanism based on the materials studied. The article lists major problems lying in the sphere of interest of the transhumanism movement and reveals methodological links of transhumanism with other branches of philosophy and science. The author identifies the preconditions for the appearance of transhumanism, both objective (economic) and ideological ones. The paper provides a classification of transhumanism branches according to the political programs they are based on and a short description of each branch: libertarian transhumanism (including extropianism), democratic transhumanism, techno-progressivism, and left-wing transhumanism. The main emphasis is put on the selfpresentation of the authors who think of themselves as transhumanists, on their attitude toward each other and on the criticism of transhumanism thought. It is concluded that transhumanism should be considered one of the possible manifestations of the socio-political reaction to the development of new technologies capable of transforming the human nature in arather radical way. For further analysis of certain ideas of transhumanism (including ethical and socio-economic), it is necessary to take into account its prerequisites and the connection with modern philosophical and scientific discussions.References
Безхмельнов В.Д. Трансгуманизм: технологическое неравенство // Молодежный научно-технический вестник. 2016. № 7. URL: http://sntbul.bmstu.ru/doc/844505.html (дата обращения: 23.07.2018).
Белялетдинов Р.Р. Почему трансгуманизм формирует образ биотехнологий? // Рабочие тетради по биоэтике. Вып. 18: Человек — NBIC машина (философско-антропологические и биоэтические исследования). М.: Изд-во Моск. гуманит. ун-та, 2014. С. 18–27.
Гальтон Ф. Наследственность таланта, её законы и последствия. СПб.: Изд. журн. «Знание», 1875. 319 с.
Дёмин И.В. Русский космизм в контексте современной техногенной цивилизации: учеб. пособие. Самара: Самар. гуманит. акад., 2014. 100 с.
Ицков Д.И. Глобальное будущее и общественное движение «Россия 2045» // Философские науки. 2013. № 8. С. 5–10.
Кайгородов П.В. Трансгуманизм: дискуссионные аспекты концепции // Идеи и идеалы. 2014. № 4, т. 2. С. 28–33.
Летов О.В. Трансгуманизм и этика // Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 3: Философия. 2009. № 2. С. 54–102.
Манифест Российского Трансгуманистического Движения // Сайт Российского Трансгуманистического Движения. URL: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/10/8/ (дата обращения: 23.07.2018).
Маслов В.М. Историко-философское введение в постчеловеческое // Фундаментальные исследования. 2013. № 10(13). С. 3033–3038.
Полякова О.В. Социальные практики российского трансгуманизма // Высшее образование в России. 2015. № 8–9. С. 154–162.
Рыбаков О.Ю., Тихонова С.В. Трансгуманизм Макса Мора: автаркия и отчуждение // Философия права. 2013. № 3. С. 56–60.
Соколова С.Н. О некоторых задачах философии в контексте перспектив технологизации человека // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2015. № 1. С. 19–30.
Bailey R. (2005). Trans-Human Expressway: Why libertarians will win the future // Reason. 2005. May 11. URL: http://reason.com/archives/2005/05/11/trans-human-expressway (accessed: 30.07.2018).
Barbrook R. Cyber-Communism: How the Americans Are Superseding Capitalism in Cyberspace // Science as Culture. 2000. Vol. 9, iss. 1. P. 5–40. DOI: 10.1080/095054300114314.
Barbrook R., Cameron A. The Californian Ideology // Science as Culture. 1996. Vol. 6, iss. 1. P. 44–72.
Bostrom N. A History of Transhumanist Though // Journal of Evolution and Technology. 2005. Vol. 14. P. 1–25.
Bostrom N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 415 p.
Bostrom N., Sandberg A. Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2009. Vol. 15(3). P. 311–341. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5.
Carrico D. Condensed Critique of Transhumanism // Amor Mundi. 2009. URL: https://amormundi.blogspot.com/2009/01/condensed-critique-of-transhumanism.html (accessed: 30.07.2018).
Carrico D. Futurological Discourses and Posthuman Terrains // Existenz. 2013. Vol. 8, no. 2. P. 47–63. URL: https://existenz.us/volumes/Vol.8-2Carrico.pdf (accessed: 30.07.2018).
Carrico D. Technoprogressivism Beyond Technophilia and Technophobia // The Technoprogressive. 2006. URL: http://technoprogressive.blogspot.com/2006/08/technoprogressivism-beyond.html (accessed: 30.07.2018).
Dvorsky G. Future Risks and the Challenge to Democracy // Sentient Developments. 2008. Dec. 22. URL: http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/2008/12/future-risks-and-challenge-to-democracy.html (accessed: 15.06.2018).
Hughes J. Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press, 2004. 294 p.
Huxley J. New Bottles for New Wine. L.: Chatto & Windus, 1957. 320 р.
Istvan Z. Why I’m Running for California Governor as a Libertarian // Newsweek, 2017. Dec. 2. URL: http://www.newsweek.com/zoltan-istvan-california-governor-libertarian-555088 (accessed: 15.07.2018).
More M. The Extropian Principles // Extropy. 1992. Vol. 4, no. 1. P. 5–8.
More M. The Philosophy of Transhumanism // The Transhumanist Reader. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2013. P. 3–17. DOI: 10.1002/9781118555927.ch1.
More M. Transhumanism: Toward a Futurist Philosophy // Extropy. 1990. Vol. 6. P. 6–12.
Reynolds G. An Army of Davids: How Markets and Technology Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other Goliaths. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 2006. 304 р.
Technoprogressive Declaration: «Transvision 2014» / Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. 2014. Nov. 22. URL: https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/tpdec2014 (accessed: 30.07.2018).
Transhumanist Declaration / Humanity+, World Transhumanist Association. 2005. URL: https://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration/ (accessed: 30.07.2018).
Transhumanist FAQ / Humanity+, World Transhumanist Association. 2016–2018. URL: https://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-faq/ (accessed: 30.07.2018).
References
Bailey R. (2005). Trans-Human Expressway: Why libertarians will win the future. Reason. 2005. May 11. Available at: http://reason.com/archives/2005/05/11/ trans-human-expressway (accessed 30.07.2018).
Barbrook R. (2000).Cyber-Communism: How the Americans Are Superseding Capitalism in Cyberspace. Science as Culture. Vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 5–40. DOI: 10.1080/095054300114314.
Barbrook, R. and Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian Ideology. Science as Culture. Vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 44–72.
Belyaletdinov, R.R. (2014). Pochemu transgumanizm formiruet obraz biotekhnologiy? [Why transhumanism forms the image of biotechnologies?]. Rabochie Tetradi Po Bioetike. Vyp. 18: Chelovek — NBIC mashina(filosofsko-antropologicheskie i bioeticheskie issledovaniya) [Workbooks on bioethics. Iss. 18: Human — NBIC machine (philosophical-anthropological and bioethical research)]. Moscow, MSH Publ., pp. 18–27.
Bezkhmelnov, V.D. (2016). Transgumanizm: Tekhnologicheskoe Neravenstvo [Transhumanism: The Technological Inequality]. Molodezhnyy nauchnotekhnicheskiy vestnik [The scientific and technical bulletin of youth]. No. 7. Available at: http://sntbul.bmstu.ru/doc/844505.html (accessed 23.07.2018).
Bostrom, N. (2005). A History of Transhumanist Thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology. Vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 1– 25.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 415 p.
Bostrom, N. and Sandberg, A. (2009). Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol. 15, iss. 3, pр. 311–341. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5.
Carrico, D. (2009). Condensed Critique of Transhumanism. Amor Mundi. Available at: https://amormundi.blogspot.com/2009/01/condensedcritique-of-transhumanism.html (accessed 30.07.2018).
Carrico, D. (2013). Futurological Discourses and Posthuman Terrains. Existenz. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 47–63. Available at: https://existenz.us/volumes/Vol.8- 2Carrico.pdf (accessed 30.07.2018).
Carrico, D. (2005). Technoprogressivism Beyond Technophilia and Technophobia. The Technoprogressive. Available at: http://technoprogressive.blogspot.com/ 2006/08/technoprogressivism-beyond.html (accessed 30.07.2018).
Dvorsky, G. (2008). Future Risks and the Challenge to Democracy. Sentient Developments. Dec. 22. Available at: http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/2008/12/ future-risks-and-challenge-to-democracy.html (accessed: 15.06.2018).
Dyomin, I.V. (2014). Russkiy kosmizm v kontekste sovremennoy tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii [Russian Cosmism in the Context of Modern Technogenic Civilization]. Samara: Samara Academy for the Humanities, 100 p.
Galton, F. (1875). Nasledstvennost talanta. Zakony i posledstviya [Hereditary Genius, its Laws and Conseguences]. Saint Petersburg : Znanie Publ., 319 p.
Hughes, J. (2004). Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Cambridge: Westview Press, 294 p.
Huxley, J. (1957). New Bottles for New Wine. London: Chatto & Windus, 320 р.
Istvan, Z. (2017). Why I’m Running for California Governor as a Libertarian. Newsweek. Dec. 2. Available at: http://www.newsweek.com/zoltan-istvan-californiagovernor-libertarian-555088 (accessed: 15.07.2018).
Itskov, D.I. (2013). Globalnoe buduschee i obschestvennoe dvizhenie «Rossiya 2045» [Global Future and the Social Movement «Russia 2045»]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophy Sciences]. No. 8, pp. 5–10.
Kaygorodov, P.V. (2014). Transgumanizm: Diskussionnye Aspekty Kontseptsii [Transhumanism: Discussion Aspects of the Concept]. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals]. No. 4, vol. 2, pp. 28–33.
Letov, O.V. (2009). Trasngumanizm i etika [Transhumanism and Ethics]. Sotsialnye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvenaya i zarubezhnaya literatura Seriya 3: Filosofiya [Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and foreign literature. Series 3: Philosophy]. No. 2, pp. 54–102. Manifest Rossiyskogo Transgumanisticheskogo Dvizheniya [Russian Transhumanism Movement Manifesto]. Available at: http://transhumanismrussia.ru/content/view/10/8/ (accessed 23.07.2018).
Maslov, V.M. (2013). Istoriko-filosofskoe vvedenie v postchelovecheskoe [Historico-Philosophical Introduction To Posthuman]. Fundamentalnye Issledovaniya [Fundamental research]. No. 10(13), pp. 3033–3038.
More, M. (1992). The Extropian Principles. Extropy. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–8.
More, M. (2013). The Philosophy of Transhumanism. The Transhumanist Reader. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3–17. DOI: 10.1002/9781118555927.ch1.
More, M. (1990). Transhumanism: Toward a Futurist Philosophy. Extropy, Institute of Extropy, Vol. 6, pр. 6–12.
Polyakova, O.V. (2015). Sotsialnye praktiki rossiyskogo transgumanizma [Transhumanism in Russia: Social Activities]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 8–9, pp. 154–162.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
