The psychological state of Russian society in the light of macro-psychological approach
Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2018-2-243-251Keywords:
methodology of psychology, general psychology, predictors and indicators of the psychological state of society, modeling of psychological phenomenaAbstract
The concept of psychological state of society is becoming popular in Russian psychology due to the spread of macro-psychological approach. In this case, not only the individual, but also the society as a whole, can be considered as a subject of activity, self-organizing system. The aim of the study is to develop a simple model of indexes describing the psychological state of Russian society. These indicators should allow predicting the psychological state of Russian society in the future as well. The main hypothesis of the study is that one of the backbone factors, determining the psychological state of society and its dynamics, is based on the different types of social polarization. The study distinguishes between objective polarization of society ( economic, political, social, etc.) and subjective one (psychological). It is assumed that the stronger the psychological polarization, the higher the probability of deterioration of the psychological state of society. At the same time, objective polarization becomes a factor of social instability when it is recognized and considered by the majority of the population as an indicator of disadvantage. Otherwise, different forms of inequality usually do not cause significant problems. Preliminary results of empirical research in accordance with the developed theoretical model are presented. The answers of respondents to the questions of several questionnaires were analyzed. Respondents were asked to assess the political, economic and social situation in Russia now and in the future. It was also proposed to assess the psychological polarization of society. The study showed that the evaluation of the subjective characteristics of the psychological state of society, taking into account the peculiarities of its psychological polarization, is promising for the development of the system of indicators. The need to clarify the definition of the psychological state of society is mentioned. In particular, it is necessary to distinguish between people’s perceptions of the psychological state of society and its objective characteristics.References
Список литературы
Воробьев Е.М., Демченко Т.И. Экономика счастья как новая экономическая парадигма // Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Сер.: Міжнародні відносини. Економіка. Країнознавство. Туризм. 2013. № 1086, вып. 2. С. 74–77. Журавлев А.Л., Юревич А.В. Макропсихология современного российского общества. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2009. 352 с.
Козелецкий Ю. Психологическая теория решений. М.: Прогресс, 1979. 504 с.
Лебедев А.Н., Гордякова О.В. Личность в системе маркетинговых коммуникаций. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2015. 304 c.
Ломов Б.Ф. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии. М.: Наука, 1984. 444 с. Майерс Д. Социальная психология. СПб.: Питер, 2010. 794 с.
Майсак О.С. SWOT-анализ: объект, факторы, стратегии. Проблемы поиска связей между факторами // Прикаспийский журнал: управление и высокие технологии. 2013. № 1(21). С. 151–157.
Осипов Г.В. Социология и государственность (достижения, проблемы, решения). М.: Вече, 2005. 567 с.
Хащенко В.А. Психология экономического благополучия. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2012. 426 с.
Юдин Э.Г. Системный подход и принцип деятельности: методологические проблемы современной науки. М.: Наука, 1978. 391 с.
Юревич А.В. Психология социальных явлений. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2014. 470 с. Andersen H. Spatial — not social polarization: social change and segregation in Copenhagen // The Greek Review of Social Research, 2004. 113A. P. 145–165.
Baum S. Sydney, Australia: a global city? Testing the social polarization thesis // Urban Studies. 1997. Vol. 34, iss. 11. P. 1881–1901. DOI: 10.1080/0042098975295.
Doise W. Individual and social identities in intergroup relations // European Journal of Social Psychology. 1988. Vol. 18, iss. 2. P. 99–111. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180202. Doise W. Social representations in personal identity // Social identity: international perspectives / ed. by S.
Worchel, J.F. Morales, D. Paez, J. Deschamps. N.Y., 1998. P. 13–25. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values and frames. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 864 p.
Maloutas T. Segregation, Social Polarization and Immigration in Athens during the 1990s: Theoretical Expectations and Contextual Difference // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2007. Vol. 31, iss. 4. P. 733–758. DOI:10.1111/j.1468- 2427.2007.00760.x.
Moscovici S., Zavalloni M. The group as a polarizer of attitudes // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1969. Jun. Vol. 12, iss. 2. P. 125–135. DOI: 10.1037/h0027568. Myers D.G. Polarizing effects of social interaction // Group decision-making / ed. by H.
Brandstatter, J.H. Davis, G. Stacker-Kreichgauer. L.: Academic Press, 1982. P. 125–161. Sassen S. Global cities and global city-regions: a comparison // Global city regions, trends, theory and policy / ed. by A.J. Scott. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2001. P. 78–95. Strauss W., Howe N. The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy — What the cycles of history tell us about America’s next rendezvous with destiny. N.Y.: Broadway Books, 1997. 400 p.
References
Andersen, H. (2004). Spatial — not social polarization: social change and segregation in Copenhagen. The Greek Review of Social Research. 113A, pp. 145–165
. Baum, S. (1997), Sydney, Australia: a global city? Testing the social polarization thesis. Urban Studies. Vol. 34, iss. 11, pp. 1881–1901. DOI: 10.1080/0042098975295.
Doise, W. (1988). Individual and social identities in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology. Vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 99–111.
Doise, W. (1998). Social representations in personal identity. Social identity: international perspectives, ed. by S. Worchel, J.F. Morales, D. Paez, J. Deschamps. New York, pp. 13–25.
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values and frames. New York, Cambridge University Press, 840 p.
Khashchenko, V.A. (2012). Psikhologiya ekonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya [Psychology of economic well-being]. Moscow, IP RAS Publ., 426 p.
Kozeletskiy, Yu. (1979). Psikhologicheskaya teoriya resheniy [Psychological Decision Theory]. Moscow, Progress, 504 p.
Lebedev, A.N., Gordyakova, O.V. (2015). Lichnost’ v sisteme marketingovykh kommunikatsiy [Personality in the system of marketing communications]. Moscow, IP RAS Publ., 304 p.
Lomov, B.F. (1984). Metodicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 444 p.
Maloutas, T. (2007). Segregation, Social Polarization and Immigration in Athens during the 1990s: Theoretical Expectations and Contextual Difference. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 31, iss. 4, pp. 733–758. DOI:10.1111/j.1468- 2427.2007.00760.x.
Maysak, O.S. (2013). SWOT-analiz: obekt, faktory, strategii. Problemy poiska svyazey mezhdu faktorami [SWOT Analysis: The Difficulty of Searching for Links Between Factors]. Prikaspiyskiy zhurnal: upravlenie i vysokie tekhnologii [Caspian Journal Managment and high technologies]. No. 1(21), pp. 151–157.
Moscovici, S., Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Jun., vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 125–135. DOI: 10.1037/h0027568.
Myers, D.G. (1982). Polarizing effects of social interaction. Group decision-making, ed. by H. Brandstatter, J.H. Davis, G. Stacker-Kreichgauer. London, Academic Press, pp. 125–161.
Myers, D.G. (2010). Sotsial’naya psikhologiya [Social Psychology]. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 794 p.
Osipov, G.V. (2005). Sotsiologiya i gosudarstvennost’ (dostizheniya, problemy, resheniya) [Sociology and Statehood: Achievements, problems, solutions]. Veche, Moscow, 567 p.
Sassen S. (2001). Global cities and global cityregions: a comparison. Global city regions, trends, theory and policy, ed. by A.J. Scott. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 78–95.
Strauss, W., Howe, N. (1997). The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy — What the cycles of history tell us about America’s next rendezvous with destiny. New York, Broadway Books, 400 p.
Vorobev, E.M., Demchenko, T.I. (2013). Ekonomika schast’ya kak novaya ekonomicheskaya paradigma [The economics of happiness as the new economic paradigm]. Vestnik Khar’kovskogo natsional’nogo universiteta im. V.N. Karazina. Ser.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Ekonomika. Regionovedenie. Turizm [V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Bulletin. Series «International Relations. Economics. Area Studies. Tourism»]. No. 1086, iss. 2, pp. 74–77. Yudin, E.G. Sistemniy podhod i printsip deyatel’nosti: metodologicheskie problem sovremennoy nauki [System approach and principle of activity: methodological problems of modern science]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 391 p.
Yurevich, A.V. (2014). Psikhologiya sotsial’nykh yavleniy [Psychology of social phenomena]. Moscow, IP RAS Publ., 470 p. Zhuravlev, A.L., Yurevich, A.V. (2009). Makropsikhologiya sovremennogo rossiyskogo obschestva [Macropsychology of the contemporary Russian society]. Moscow, IP RAS Publ., 352 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
