Career strategies of young rural doctors of the Leningrad region: a narrative analysis

Sociology

Authors

  • Konstantin A. Galkin National Research University «Higher School of Economic» in Saint Petersburg, 16, Soyuza Pechatnikov str., Saint Petersburg, 190008, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2018-1-158-167

Keywords:

young rural doctors, careers of young rural doctors, professional identity of young rural doctors, careers of rural professionals, career strategies of Russian rural doctor

Abstract

Population health is one of the most significant human resources which largely determine the progress in the competition, productivity and agricultural economic activity. It has a huge social and economic growth effect in general. It also plays a huge role in village areas which come second in terms of importance after all cities and towns. Over the last decade, there has been a growing research interest in career strategies in medicine among young medical professionals. However, there is little empirical research on young rural doctors’ career strategies in Russia. This study is in line with medical professions studies and rural studies. Young physicians have different career orientations towards learning and practicing medicine. Some of them need more support for their professional development. The study employs the biographical interview method, which allows us to consider the formation of career strategies of young doctors from various conceptual perspectives, such as everyday practices, interactions in work environment, and communication with rural community. The main analytical method was a thematic analysis of young doctors’ narrative stories. Based on those interviews, the article aims to find answersto the following questions: «How to preserve professionalism while working in rural areas?» and «How to devise a career strategy when you enter a rural community?» The empirical base of the study are 40 interviews with young rural doctors from the Leningrad region. When analysing the narrative interviews, two main strategies informing a young doctor’s career have been found: rural career (focused on life and work in the countryside) and moving strategy (focused on moving from rural to urban areas). Each career type has its own way of positioning oneself as a doctor in a rural community. The received data allows for investigating the career strategies of young doctors based on the thematic analysis of narrative interviews and it can be used to improve the process of young doctors’ integration into working in villages. Our analysis takes account of the strategies young rural doctors use to make a career, their feeling of belonging or non-belonging to the rural community, and different views on rurality. The topics of discussion deal with career choice, working experiences and career opportunities. The study contributes to rural professions studies and medical studies. 

Author Biography

Konstantin A. Galkin , National Research University «Higher School of Economic» in Saint Petersburg, 16, Soyuza Pechatnikov str., Saint Petersburg, 190008, Russia

Ph.D. Student, Lector St. Petersburg Schoolof Social Sciences and Humanities

References

Вяткина Н.Ю., Вахромеева А.Ю. Возрождение земской медицины: реалии и перспективы // Социология медицины. 2012. № 2(21). С. 38–40.

Кодин И.Н. Не хлебом единым…: практики трудового поведения сельских жителей (случай села Парфеньево) // Лабиринт. 2014. № 3. С. 40–48.

Маршалл Т.Х. Новейшая история профессионализма в связи с социальной структурой и социальной политикой // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2010. Т. 8, № 1. С. 105–124.

Нефедова Т.Г. Трансформация сельского хозяйства России: мифология и реальность // Мир России. Социология. Этнология. 2013. Т. 22, № 1. С. 29–60.

Evetts J. A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities // Current sociology. 2011. Vol. 59, iss. 4. P. 406–422.

Evetts J. Dimensions of career: avoiding reification in the analysis of change // Sociology. 1992. Vol. 26, iss. 1. P. 1–21.

Farmer J. et al. A scoping review of the association between rural medical education and rural practice location // Human resources for health. 2015. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 27. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0017-3.

Farmer J., Prior M., Taylor J.A theory of how rural health services contribute to community sustainability // Social Science & Medicine. 2012. Vol. 75, iss. 10. P. 1903–1911. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.035.

Han G.S., Humphreys J.S. Overseas-trained doctors in Australia: community integration and their intention to stay in a rural community // Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2005. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 236–241. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2005.00708.x.

Kim Y.M. et al. Impact of supervision and self-assessment on doctor–patient communication in rural Mexico // International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2002. Vol. 14, № 5. P. 359–367.

Leyshon M. The betweeness of being a rural youth: inclusive and exclusive lifestyles // Social & Cultural Geography. 2008. Vol. 9, no. 1. P. 1–26. DOI: 10.1080/14649360701789535.

Mellow M. The Work of Rural Professionals: Doing the Gemeinschaft-Gesellschaft Gavotte // Rural Sociology. 2005. Vol. 70, iss. 1. P. 50–69. DOI: 10.1526/0036011053294637.

Monrouxe L.V. Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care? // Medical education. 2010. Vol. 44, iss. 1. P. 40–49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03440.x.

Rye J.F. Rural youths’ images of the rural // Journal of Rural Studies. 2006. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 409–421.

Sureshkumar P. et al. Factors related to doctors’ choice of rural pathway in general practice specialty training // Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2017. Vol. 25, № 3. P. 148–154. DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12311.

References

Evetts J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current sociology. Vol. 59, iss. 4, pp. 406–422. (In English).

Evetts J. (1992) Dimensions of career: avoiding reification in the analysis of change. Sociology. Vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 1–21. (In English).

Farmer J. et al. (2015). A scoping review of the association between rural medical education and rural practice location. Human resources for health. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 27. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0017-3. (In English).

Farmer J., Prior M., Taylor J. (2012). A theory of how rural health services contribute to community sustainability. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 75, iss. 10, pp. 1903–1911. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.035. (In English).

Han G.S., Humphreys J.S. (2005). Overseas-trained doctors in Australia: community integration and their intention to stay in a rural community. Australian Journal of Rural Health. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 236–241. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2005.00708.x. (In English).

Kim Y.M. et al. (2002). Impact of supervision and self-assessment on doctor–patient communication in rural Mexico. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. Vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 359–367. (In English).

Kodin I.N. (2014) Ne khlebom edinym…: praktiki trudovogo povedeniya sel’skih zhiteley (sluchay sela Parfen’evo) [Fed not by bread alone…: practice of occupational behavior of rural residents (case of the village of Parfen’evo)]. Labirint [Labyrinth]. No. 3, pp. 40–48. (In Russian).

Leyshon M. (2008). The betweeness of being a rural youth: inclusive and exclusive lifestyles. Social & Cultural Geography. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–26. DOI: 10.1080/14649360701789535. (In English).

Marshall T.Kh. (2010) Noveyshaya istoriya professionalizma v svyazi s sotsial’noy strukturoy i sotsial’noy politikoy [The recent history of professionalism in relation with the social structure and social policy]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki [Journal of social policy studies]. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 105–124. (In Russian).

Mellow M. (2005). The Work of Rural Professionals: Doing the Gemeinschaft-Gesellschaft Gavotte. Rural Sociology. Vol. 70, iss. 1, pp. 50–69. DOI: 10.1526/0036011053294637. (In English).

Monrouxe L.V. (2010). Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care? Medical education. Vol. 44, iss. 1, pp. 40–49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2923.2009.03440.x. (In English).

Nefedova T.G. (2013) Transformatsiya sel’skogo khozyaystva Rossii: mifologiya i real’nost’ [Transformation of agriculture in Russia: mythology and reality]. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya [World of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 29–60. (In Russian).

Rye J.F. (2006). Rural youths’ images of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 409–421. (In English).

Sureshkumar P. et al. (2017). Factors related to doctors’ choice of rural pathway in general practice specialty training. Australian Journal of Rural Health. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 148–154. DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12311. (In English).

Vyatkina N. Y, Vakhrameev A. Y. (2012). Vozrozhdenie zemskoy meditsiny: realii i perspektivy [The Revival of Zemstvo medicine: realities and prospects]. Sotsiologiya meditsiny [The Sociology of medicine]. No. 2(21), pp. 38–40. (In Russian).

Published

2018-03-30

Issue

Section

Статьи