Freedom and responsibility as intrinsic forces of a person
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2018-1-45-52Keywords:
freedom, responsibility, intrinsic forces, continuum, essence of the personAbstract
The author analyzes the problem of freedom and responsibility as intrinsic forces of a person, expressing one’s productive mode of being. Freedom is implanted in a human being as their internal activity, i.e. determination to go beyond the borders of the acquired and learned, to broaden relative independence from circumstances, toovercome historical limits. Ontological backgrounds of freedom are contained in self-organization of matter transferring itself from one level to another. A human, as a being having universal and general content, bearing in himself the main richness of content of all previous development steps, accumulates in himself a creativepower of the world — to be the cause of himself. A human transforms the deep levels of the organization of matter, which is an external aspect of human existence, but for matter in general it is an internal aspect of its development. Through the person, matter goes deep into itself, in the essence, and through steps of his (person’s) development comes to new higher levels, while the person develops his own life, his essence through transformation of the nature. Since in the development of the world it is possible to find orientation towards manifestation of the person, and in human history — orientation to deepening into the essence, the personbears responsibility for the course of events.References
Барг О.А. Живое в едином мировом процессе. Пермь, 1993. 227 с.
Бязрова Дж.Б. Прогресс. Человек. Свобода // Философия и общество. 2001. № 1(22). С. 76–86.
Васильева Т.С. Сущность и смысл истории. Пермь, 1996. 135 с.
Гобозов И.А. Свобода: Иллюзия и действительность // Философия и общество. 2014. № 3(75). С. 5–20.
Друкер П.Ф. Задачи менеджмента в XXIвеке. М.: Вильямс, 2001. 272 с.
Кайдалов В.А. Деятельность, творчество, культура // Новые идеи в философии. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. ун-та, 1992. Вып. 1. С. 66–70.
Кастельс М. Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура. М.: ГУ-ВШЭ, 2000. 607 с.
Маркс К. Экономические рукописи 1857–1859 годов // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч.: в 50 т. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1968. Т. 46, ч. 1. 560 с.
Орлов В.В. Человек, мир, мировоззрение. М.: Молодая гвардия, 1985. 220 с.
Орлов В.В., Васильева Т.С. Труд и социализм. Пермь, 1991. 204 с.
Семенов Ю.И. Диалектический материализм: его место в истории философской мысли и современное значение // Философия и общество. 2002. № 3(28). С. 74–102.
Урманцев Н.М. Свобода общества и человека: аспекты самоорганизации // Философия и общество. 2007. № 4(48). С. 68–82.
Чанышев А.Н. Курс лекций по древней философии. М.: Высш. школа, 1981. 374 с.
Чернова Т.Г. О соотношении свободы и необходимости // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2014. № 2(18). С. 20–24.
Энгельс Ф.Анти-Дюринг // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч.: в 50 т. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1961. Т. 20. С. 1–338.
References
Barg O.A. (1993). Zhivoe v edinom mirovom protsesse [Living in a single world process]. Perm, 227 p. (In Russian).
Byazrova J.B. (2001). Progress. Chelovek. Svoboda [Progress. Man. Freedom]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 1(22). P. 76–86. (In Russian).
Castells M. (2000). Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul’tura [Informational epoch: economics, society and culture]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 607 p. (In Russian).
Chanyshev A.N. (1981). Kurs lektsiy po drevney filosofii [Course of lectures on Ancient philosophy]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 374 p. (In Russian).
Chernova T.G. (2014). O sootnoshenii svobody i neobkhodimosti [On the relation between freedom and necessity]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. No. 2(18), pp. 20–24. (In Russian).
Drucker P.F. (2001). Zadachi menedzhmenta v XXI veke [Management Challenges for 21st Century]. Moscow: Vil’yams Publ., 272 p. (In Russian).
Engels F. (1961). Anti-Duyring [Anti-Duhring]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols.]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., vol. 20, pp. 1–338. (In Russian).
Gobozov I.A. (2014). Svoboda: illyuziya i deystvitel’nost’ [Freedom: Illusion and reality]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 3(75), pp. 5–20. (In Russian).
Kaydalov V.A. (1992). Deyatel’nost, tvorchestvo, kul’tura [Activity, creativity, culture]. Novye idei v filosofii [New ideas in philosophy]. Perm, Perm State University Publ., iss. 1, pp. 66–70. (In Russian).
Marx K. (1968). Ekhonomicheskie rukopisi 1857– 1859 godov [Economic manuscripts of 1857–1859]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols.]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., vol. 46, part 2, 560 p. (In Russian).
Orlov V.V. (1985). Chelovek, mir, mirovozzrenie [Man, world, worldview]. Moscow, Molodaya Gvardiya Publ., 220 p. (In Russian).
Orlov V.V., Vasileva T.S. (1991). Trud i sotsializm. [Labor and socialism]. Perm, Perm State Univ. Publ., 204 p. (In Russian).
Semyenov Yu. I. (2002). Dialekticheskiy materialism: ego mesto v istorii filosofskoy mysli i sovremennoe znachenie [Dialectical materialism: its place in the history of philosophical thought and contemporary value]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 3(28), pp. 74–102. (In Russian).
Urmantsev N.M. (2007). Svoboda obshchestva i cheloveka: aspekty samoorganizatsii [Freedom of society and man: aspects of self-organization]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and Society]. no. 4(48), pp. 68–82. (In Russian).
Vasil’eva T.S. (1996). Sushchnost’ i smysl istorii [The essence and meaning of history]. Perm, 135 p. (In Russian).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
