Psychometric characteristics of the Short Questionnaire of the Dark Triad
Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-4-525-538Keywords:
psychometrics, validity, reliability, personality traits, Dark Triad, Machiavellianism, Narcissism, Psychopathy, IRTAbstract
In recent years, the study of negative personality traits has aroused the interest of researchers. One example is the complex of three personality traits: Machiavellianism, Narcissismus and Psychopathy, which is referred to as the Dark Triad. The study of this phenomenon is also associated with the creation of diagnostic tools to measure the traits that make up the Dark Triad. The article presents the psychometric foundations of the "Short Questionnaire of the Dark Triad" and two versions of the questionnaire, adapted on the Russian sample. The study consists of sequential psychometric testing procedures, including retest reliability analysis, questionnaire structure, and assessment of individual items using the IRT. The aim of the study is to assess the psychometric quality of the questionnaire using classical (linear) and non-linear methods. The sample consisted of 459 people (69.5% were women). Two versions of the questionnaire were created: full (27 items) and adjusted (18 items). The structure of the adapted variants in general coincides with the original questionnaire. We found sufficient reliability for the traits of the Dark Triad (Machiavellianism - 0.72; Narcissism - 0.75 and Psychopathy - 0.65), which is consistent with the data of other studies. Retest reliability showed reproducibility of the results. A comparison of Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Psychopathy with personality traits on the NEHASO-60 questionnaire shows negative correlations with Honesty-Preference to Deception, Emotionality, and Benevolence. The results suggest that both versions of the questionnaire are acceptable for diagnosing the traits that make up the Dark Triad.References
Егорова М.С., Паршикова О.В., Ситникова М.А. Адаптация Короткого опросника Темной триады // Психологические исследования. 2015. Т. 8, № 43. URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n43/1181-egorova43.html (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).
Корнилова Т.В., Корнилов С.А., Чумакова М.А., Талмач М.С. Методика диагностики личностных черт Темной триады: апробация опросника Темная Дюжина // Психологический журнал. 2015. Т. 36, № 2. С. 99–112.
Фер Р.М., Бакарак В.Р. Психометрика: Введение / пер. с англ. А.С. Науменко, А.Ю. Попова; под ред. Н.А. Батурина, Е.В. Эйдмана. Челябинск: Изд. центр ЮУрГУ, 2010. 445 c.
Aghababaei N., Mohammadtabar S., Saffarinia M. Dirty Dozen vs. the H factor: Comparison of the Dark Triad and Honesty – Humility in prosociality, religiosity, and happiness // Personality and Individual Differences. 2014. Vol. 67. P. 6–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.026
Ashton M.C., Lee K. The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality // Journal of Personality Assessment. 2009. Vol. 91, iss. 4. P. 340–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
Book A., Visser B., Volk A. Unpacking «evil»: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad // Personality and Individual Differences. 2015. Vol. 73. P. 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016
Christie R., Geis F. Studies in Machiavellianism. N.Y.: Academic Press, 1970. 467 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-10497-7
Egan V., Auty J., Miller R. et al. Sensational interests and general personality traits // Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 1999. Vol. 10, iss. 3. P. 567–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189908402160
Furnham A., Richards S.C., Paulhus D.L. The Dark Triad: A 10 year review // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2013. Vol. 7, iss. 3. P. 199–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
Jonason P.K., Webster G.D. The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad // Psychological Assessment. 2010. Vol. 22, iss. 2. P. 420–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
Jones D.N., Paulhus D.L. Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality Traits // Assessment. 2014. Vol. 21, iss. 1. P. 28–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
Jones D.N., Paulhus D.L. The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality // Personality and Individual Differences. 2011. Vol. 51, iss. 5. P. 679–682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.011
McHoskey J.W., Worzel W., Szyarto C. Machiavellianism and psychopathy // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998. Vol. 74, iss. 1. P. 192–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.192
McHoskey J.W. Narcissism and Machiavellianism // Psychological Reports. 1995. Vol. 77, iss. 3. P. 755–759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3.755
Morizot J.M., Ainsworth A.T., Reise S.P. Towards modern psychometrics: Application of item response theory models in personality research // Handbook of research methods in personality psychology / ed. by R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, R.F. Krueger. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2007. P. 407–423.
Paulhus D.L., Dutton D.G. Everyday sadism // The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology / ed. by V. Zeigler-Hill, D.K. Marcus. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2016. P. 109–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14854-006
Paulhus D.L., Williams K. The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy // Journal of Research in Personality. 2002. Vol. 36, iss. 6. P. 556–563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
Raskin R., Hall C.S. A Narcissistic Personality Inventory // Psychological Reports. 1979. Vol. 45, iss. 2. P. 590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590
Roeser K., McGregor V.E., Stegmaier S. et al. The Dark Triad of personality and unethical behavior at different times of day // Personality and Individual Differences. 2016. Vol. 88. P. 73–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.002
Samejima F. Graded response models // Handbook of item response theory. Volume 1: Models. London: Chapman & Hall, 2016. P. 95–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315374512
Schumacker R.E. Latent variable interaction modeling // Structural Equation Modeling. 2002. Vol. 9, iss. 1. P. 40–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0901_3
Stankov L., Knezevic G. Amoral social attitudes and value orientations among Serbs and Australians // Australian Journal of Psychology. 2005. Vol. 57, iss. 2. P. 115–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530500048649
Veselka L., Schermer J.A., Vernon P.A. The Dark Triad and an expanded framework of personality // Personality and Individual Differences. 2012. Vol. 53, iss. 4. P. 417–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.002
Williams K.M., Paulhus D.L., Hare R.D. Capturing the four-factor structure of psychopathy in college students via self-report // Journal of Personality Assessment. 2007. Vol. 88, iss. 2. P. 205–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268074
References
Aghababaei, N., Mohammadtabar, S. and Saffarinia, M. (2014). Dirty Dozen vs. the H factor: comparison of the Dark Triad and honesty-humility in prosociality, religiosity, and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 67, pp. 6–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.026
Ashton, M.C. and Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment. Vol. 91, iss. 4, pp. 340–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00223890902935878
Book, A., Visser, B. and Volk, A. (2015). Unpacking «evil»: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 73, pp. 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.paid.2014.09.016
Christie, R. and Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 467 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-10497-7
Egan, V., Auty, J., Miller, R. et al. (1999). Sensational interests and general personality traits. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. No. 10, pp. 567–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189908402160
Egorova, M.S., Sitnikova, M.A. and Parshikova, O.V. (2015). Adaptatsiya Korotkogo oprosnika Temnoi triady [Adaptation of the Short Dark Triad]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies]. Vol. 8, no. 43. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/ index.php/num/2015v8n43/1181-egorova43.html (accessed 25.07.2019).
Furnham, A., Richards, S.C. and Paulhus, D.L. (2013). The Dark Triad: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 199–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ spc3.12018
Furr, R.M. and Bacharach, V.R. (2010). Psikhometrika: Vvedenie [Psychometrics: An introduction]. Chelyabinsk: SUSU Publ., 445 p.
Jonason, P.K. and Webster, G.D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment. Vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 420– 432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
Jones, D.N. and Paulhus, D.L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of Dark Personality traits. Assessment. Vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 28– 41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
Jones, D.N. and Paulhus, D.L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 51, iss. 5, pp. 679–682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.paid.2011.04.011
Kornilova, T.V., Kornilov, S.A., Chumakova, M.A. and Talmach, M. S. (2015). Metodika diagnostiki lichnostnykh chert Temnoy triady: aprobatsiya oprosnika Temnaya Dyuzhina [The Dark Triad personality traits measure: approbation of the Dirty Dozen questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 99–112.
McHoskey, J.W., Worzel, W. and Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 74, iss. 1, pp. 192–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.74.1.192
McHoskey, J.W. (1995). Narcissism and Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports. Vol. 77, iss. 3, pp. 755–759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/ pr0.1995.77.3.755
Morizot, J.M., Ainsworth, A.T. and Reise, S.P. (2007). Towards modern psychometrics: Application of item response theory models in personality research. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology, ed. by R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, R.F. Krueger. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 407–423.
Paulhus, D.L. and Dutton, D.G. (2016). Everyday sadism. The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology, ed. by V. Zeigler-Hill, D.K. Marcus. Washington: American Psychological Association Publ., pp. 109– 120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14854-006
Paulhus, D. and Williams, K. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 36, iss. 6, pp. 556–563. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
Raskin, R. and Hall, C.S. (1979). A Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports. Vol. 45, iss. 2, p. 590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/ pr0.1979.45.2.590
Roeser, K., McGregor, V.E., Stegmaier, S. et al. (2016). The Dark Triad of personality and unethical behavior at different times of day. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 88, pp. 73–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.002
Samejima, F. (2016). Graded response models. Handbook of item response theory: Volume 1. London: Chapman and Hall Publ., pp. 123–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315374512
Schumacker, R.E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modeling. Vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 40–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15328007sem0901_3
Stankov, L. and Knezevic, G. (2005). Amoral social attitudes and value orientations among Serbs and Australians. Australian Journal of Psychology. Vol. 57, iss. 2, pp. 115–128. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00049530500048649
Veselka, L., Schermer, J.A. and Vernon, P.A. (2012). The Dark Triad and an expanded framework of personality. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 53, iss. 4, pp. 417–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.002
Williams, K.M., Paulhus, D.L. and Hare, R.D. (2007). Capturing the four-factor structure of psychopathy in college students via self-report. Journal of Personality Assessment. Vol. 88, iss. 2, pp. 205–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268074
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.