"The Russian Model of Management and the Problem of Labor Productivity: A Philosophical Analysis
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-4-473-482Keywords:
Russia, management, productivity, factors, phenomenology, being, time, history, theAbstract
Based on the developments of the economist A. Prokhorov formulated empirical patterns characterizing the features of the "Russian model of management": the pattern of cluster/clan nature of the typical Russian organization, poorly managed at the grassroots level and the pattern of the cycle of alternating "stagnant" and "mobilization" phases of development. It is shown that these regularities, on the one hand, do not contribute to an increase in labor productivity in Russian enterprises, however, on the other hand, allow the economy as a whole to function as quite productive. Further, this empirical material is subjected to Dasein-analysis by investigating the specificity of Russian being and time. The main structures of Russian here-being are revealed: "avos"-being and carelessness. Russian being appears to be on the other side of the traditional European opposition of existence and non-existence, thinking and madness, fear and fearlessness, death and immortality. It is shown that Russian existence is ontologically ambivalent. Also marked is the difference in understanding of the nature of time in European and Russian thinking, expressed in the figures of line and circle respectively. The main modus of thinking for a European is the future, which defines his active work on changing the reality, while for a Russian it is the past that is "stuck" in the present and doesn't let the future come true. From the point of view of the phenomenological model, this is what determines the cyclical nature of the time of Russian existence. The phenomenon of the "Russian miracle" corresponding to Prokhorov's "mobilization phase" is interpreted as an ontologically inconsistent and therefore always short-lived attempt to "liberate" time and go beyond everyday life by taking responsibility for one's own existence. The possibilities of transforming the traditional "Russian model of governance" to increase its productivity are analyzed.References
Александр Прохоров о русском менеджменте. От застоя к росту / YouTube. 2018. 17 мая. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H2bU-o69kw (дата обращения: 01.10.2019).
Ануфриева Е.В., Полежаев Д.В. Менталитет и национальное сознание: личностное измерение // Гуманитарные и социально-экономические науки. 2010. № 6(55). С. 23–26.
Васильев Г.Е. Философия Базилевса. М.: Прогресс–Традиция, 2008. 376 с.
Внутских А.Ю., Сокрута Л.В., Пищальников Д.В. Повышение производительности труда как междисциплинарная проблема: историческая ретроспектива // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Социология. Психология. 2015. Вып. 4(24). С. 132–142. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2015-4-132-142
Даль В.И. Толковый словарь живого великорусского языка. М.: Русский язык, 1978. Т. 1. 699 с.
Карпов М. Две недели — ЗОЖ, две недели — запой // Лента.Ру. 2019. 30 ноя. URL: https://lenta.ru/articles/2019/11/30/zog_ussr/ (дата обращения 30.11.2019).
Комаров С.В. Время русского бытия (часть I) // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Культура. История. Философия. Право. 2015. № 4. С. 30–39.
Комаров С.В. Время русского бытия (часть II) // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Культура. История. Философия. Право. 2016. № 1. С. 5–16.
Комаров С.В. Метафизика и феноменология субъективности. Исторические пролегомены к фундаментальной онтологии сознания. СПб.: Алетейя, 2007. 731 c.
Комаров С.В. «Патология» русского бытия, или русская глупость. Маленькое эссе о глупости (2) // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2014. Вып. 2(18). С. 49–59.
Кузнецов А.Е. Производя раздор: Браверман, Буравой и Кларк // Социальные и гуманитарные науки: теория и практика. 2018. Вып. 1(2). С. 379–391.
Люббе Г. В ногу со временем. Сокращенное пребывание в настоящем. М.: Изд-во НИУ ВШЭ, 2016. 456 с.
Никитин А. Авось-анализ. Как короткая память мешает гражданам богатеть. // Коммерсант. 2015. № 45 от 16 ноя. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2850128 (дата обращения: 01.10.2019).
Пищальников Д.В., Ныркова Ю.Л., Руднова Н.А и др. Комплексный подход в изучении производительности труда: актуальное состояние и перспективы исследования // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2018. Вып. 4. С. 562–572. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-4-562-572
Полный церковно-славянский словарь. 2012–2015. URL: http://www.orthodic.org/word/3539 (дата обращения: 01.10.2019).
Прохоров А.П. Русская модель управления. М.: ЗАО «Журнал “Эксперт”», 2002. 376 с.
Синякина Е.Г. Религиозность и народное благочестие русского крестьянства дореволюционного периода как основа его духовно-нравственного развития // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Человек и мир. 2017. Т. 1, № 2. C. 18–47.
Heidegger M. Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis) // Heidegger M. Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 65. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2003. 521 s.
Vnutskikh A., Pishchalnikov D., Tolochek V. Professional Destructions of Employees at Enterprises Against the Background of the Problem ofLabour Productivity Growth // Proceedings of the II International Scientific-Practical Conference «Psychology of Extreme Professions» (ISPCPEP 2019). Arkhangelsk: Atlantis Press, 2019. Vol. 321. P. 222–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ispcpep-19.2019.54
Wer- / Online Etymology Dictionary. URL: https://www.etymonline.com/word/*wer-?ref=etymonline_crossreference (дата обращения: 01.10.2019).
References
Aleksandr Prokhorov o russkom menedzhmente (2018). May 17. [Alexandr Prokhorov about Russian management]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=7H2bU-o69kw (accessed 01.10.2019).
Anufrieva, E.V. and Polezhaev, D.V. (2010). Mentalitet i natsional’noye soznaniye: lichnostnoye izmereniye [Mentality and national consciousness: the personal dimension]. Gumanitarnyye i sotsial’noekonomicheskiye nauki [The Humanities and SocialEconomic Sciences]. No. 6(55), pp. 23–26.
Dal’, V.I. (1978). Tolkovyy slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the live Great Russian language]. Moscow: Russkiy Yazyk Publ., vol. 1, 699 p.
Heidegger, M. (2003). Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis) [Contributions to philosophy (from Enowning)]. Heidegger M. Gesamtausgabe [Heidegger M. Complete edition]. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Publ., vol. 65, 521 p.
Karpov, M. (2019). Dve nedeli — ZOZh, dve nedeli — zapoy [Two weeks — Health Promotion, two weeks — Zapoy]. Lenta.Ru. Nov. 30. Available at: https://lenta.ru/articles/2019/11/30/zog_ussr/ (accessed 30.11.2019).
Komarov, S.V. (2007). Metafizika i fenomenologiya sub’ektivnosti. Istoricheskie prolegomeny k fundamental’noy ontologii soznaniya [Metaphysics and phenomenology of subjectivity: historical prolegomena to fundamental ontology of consciousness]. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ., 731 p.
Komarov, S.V. (2014). «Patologiya» russkogo bytiya, ili russkaya glupost’. Malen’koye esse o gluposti (2) [Casus of a fool. Small essay on stupidity (2)]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. Iss. 2(18), pp. 49–59.
Komarov, S.V. (2015). Vremya russkogo bytiya (chast’ I) [The time of Russian being (part one)]. Vestnik PNIPU. Kul’tura. Istoriya. Filosofiya. Pravo. [Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law]. Iss. 4, pp. 30–39.
Komarov, S.V. (2016). Vremya russkogo bytiya (chast’ II) [The time of Russian being (part two)]. Vestnik PNIPU. Kul’tura. Istoriya. Filosofiya. Pravo. [Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law]. Iss. 1, pp. 5–16.
Kuznetsov, A.E. (2018). Proizvodya razdor: Braverman, Buravoy i Klark [Manufacturing dissent: Braverman, Burawoy and Clarke]. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki: teoriya i praktika [Social Sciences and Humanities: Theory and Practice]. Iss. 1(2), pp. 379–391.
Lübbe, G. (2016). V nogu so vremenem. Sokrashchennoye prebyvaniye v nastoyashchem [In the course of time: shortened stay in the present]. Moscow: NRU HSE Publ., 456 p.
Nikitin, A. (2015). Avos’-analiz. Kak korotkaya pamyat’ meshaet grazhdanam bogatet’ [«Perhapsbased analysis». How a short memory prevents citizens from getting rich]. Kommersant [Kommersant]. Iss. 45, Nov. 16. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2850128 (accessed 01.10.2019).
Wer-. Online Etymology Dictionary (2001–2019). Available at: https://www.etymonline.com/word/ *wer-?ref=etymonline_crossreference (accessed 01.10.2019).
Pishchalnikov, D.V., Nyrkova, Yu.L., Rudnova, N.A. et al. (2018). Kompleksnyy podkhod v izuchenii proizvoditel’nosti truda: aktual’noe sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovaniya [An integrated approach to examine of labour productivity: actual state and perspectives of research]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy Psychology. Sociology»]. Iss. 4, pp. 562–572. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-4-562-572
Polnyy tserkovno-slavyanskiy slovar’ (2012– 2015) [A full church-Slavonic language’s dictionary. Available at: http://www.orthodic.org/word/3539 (accessed 01.10.2019).
Prokhorov, A.P. (2002). Russkaya model’ upravleniya [The Russian model of management]. Moscow: ZAO «Zhurnal “Ekspert”» Publ., 376 p.
Sinyakina, E.G. (2017). Religioznost’ i narodnoye bla-gochestiye russkogo krest’yanstva dorevolyutsionnogo perioda kak osnova yego dukhovnonravstvennogo razvitiya [Religiosity and popular piety the Russian of pre-revolutionary period as the basis of its spiritual and moral developvent]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Chelovek i mir [Institute of Psychology of RAS. Human and the world]. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 18–47.
Vasiliev, G.E. (2008). Filosofiya Bazilevsa [The Philosophy of Basileus]. Moscow: Progress– Traditsiya Publ., 376 p.
Vnutskikh, A.Yu., Sokruta, L.V. and Pishchalnikov, D.V. (2015). Povyshenie proizvoditel’nosti truda kak mezhdistsiplinarnaya problema: istoricheskaya retrospektiva [Increasing of labour productivity as an interdisciplinary problem: historical retrospective]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. Iss. 4(24), pp. 132–142. DOI: 10.17072/2078- 7898/2015-4-132-142
Vnutskikh, A., Pishchalnikov, D. and Tolochek, V. (2019). Professional destructions of employees at enterprises against the background of the problem of labour productivity growth. Proc. of the 2nd International Scientific-Practical Conference «Psychology of Extreme Professions» (ISPCPEP 2019). Arkhangelsk: Atlantis Press, vol. 321, pp. 222–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ispcpep19.2019.54
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
