The Audiovisual Environment of Southern Russian Cities through the Eyes of Citizens: Education as a Social Framework for Constructing Space
Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-3-429-439Keywords:
city, audiovisual urban space, level of education of citizens, social construction of spaceAbstract
Audiovisual environment of the modern city is understood as a socio-cultural space in which the system of norms, values, social and stratification differences largely determines what the citizens notice in the surrounding space. Actual status formalizes the socially set angle, point of view, setting the commonality of reading and interpretation of space, the allocation of "places of memory" and leisure, priorities of improvement. The components of the status, guiding the assessment of urban space, can include the level of education of citizens. The purpose of this article is to present the data of empirical research on the assessments of audiovisual space of South Russian cities by citizens with different levels of education. The research methodology is based on the principles of social stratification approach, social constructivism, sociology of space, spatial syntax methodology. In the course of the study the peculiarities of respondents with higher, specialized secondary, general secondary and incomplete education attitude to urban spaces were highlighted, which can be used in the practice of urban planning. Education can be considered as one of the social frameworks that set directions and ways of constructing, evaluating and interpreting urban space by social subjects, but its influence is ambiguous, mediated by other variables, it acts as a social and cultural resource of a citizen. A high level of education is associated with satisfaction with space, a higher social and territorial identity; a low level of education narrows opportunities for realization, development, career and life opportunities. The theoretical and empirical search for other social frameworks of citizens' construction of audiovisual urban space, further study of the issue, including the research materials in other regions, seems promising.References
Барковская А.Ю. Социологическая интерпретация категории «социальное пространство» // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 7. Философия. 2013. № 1, вып. 19. С. 49–55.
Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности: Трактат по социологии знания / пер. Е. Руткевич. М.: Медиум, 1995. 323 с.
Бобков В.Н., Одинцова Е.В. Средние классы в социальной структуре занятого населения в России // Вестник Института социологии. 2019. № 29. С. 58–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2019.29.2.576
Бурдье П. Социология социального пространства / пер. с фр. Н.А. Шматко. СПб.: Алтейя, 2007. 288 с.
Быстрова Т.Ю., Певная М.В., Папулова А.А. Ресурсы культурной регенерации уральских городов в оценках молодого поколения горожан // Вопросы управления. 2018. № 6, вып. 36. С. 177–187.
Ваньке А.В., Полухина Е.В. Территториальная идентичность в индустриальных районах: культурные практики заводских рабочих и деятелей современного искусства // Laboratorium: Журнал Социальных Исследований. 2018. № 10(3). С. 4–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2018-10-3-4-34
Заборова Е.Н., Исламова А.Ф. Город как социальное пространство // Социологические исследования. 2013. № 2. С. 97–101.
Лефевр А. Производство пространства / пер. с фр. С.А. Эфирова // Социологическое обозрение. 2002. Т. 2, № 3. С. 27–29.
Ло Дж. Объекты и пространства // Социологическое обозрение. 2006. Т. 5, №. 1. С. 30–42.
Российское общество и вызовы времени. Кн. третья / под ред. М.К. Горшкова, Н.Е. Тихоновой. М.: Весь Мир, 2016. 424 с.
Радина Н.К., Поршнев А.В. Пожилые горожане мегаполисов и малых городов: солидарность, альтруизм и приоритеты в области городского развития // Социология власти. 2014. № 3. С. 141–158.
Сараф М.Я. Культурное пространство как предмет исследования // Пространство и время. 2011. № 4(6). С. 15–19.
Сводные итоги Всероссийской переписи населения 2010 года. Разд. 2. Уровень образования населения. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/vol11pdf-m.html (дата обращения: 22.07.2019).
Социальное пространство современного города / под. ред. Г.Б. Кораблевой, А.В. Меренкова. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2015. 252 с.
Тихонова Н.Е. Факторы стратификации в современной России: динамика сравнительной значимости // Социологические исследования. 2014. № 10. С. 23–35.
Федеральная служба государственной статистики. URL: http://www.gks.ru/ (дата обращения: 29.07.2019).
Федотова Н.Г. Формирование городской идентичности: факторный и институциональный аспекты // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2017. № 20, вып. 3. С. 32–49.
Филиппов А.Ф. Социология пространства. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2008. 290 с.
Штомпка П. Социология: Анализ современного общества / пер. с польск. С.М. Червонной. М.: Логос, 2005. 664 с.
Hillier B. Space and Spatiality: What the Built Environment needs from Social Theory // Building Research and Information. 2008. Vol. 36, vol. 3. P. 216–230.
Jeon J.Y., Lee P.J., Hong J.Y., Lavandier C. et al. A Cross-National Comparison in Assessment of Urban Park Soundscapes in France, Korea, and Sweden Through Laboratory Experiments // Applied Acoustics. 2017. No. 130. P. 107–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.016
References
Barkovskaya, A.Yu. (2013). Sotsiologicheskaya interpretatsiya kategorii «sotsial’noe prostranstvo» [Sociological interpretation of the category of «social space»]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Philosophy]. No. 1, iss. 19, p. 49–55.
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1995). Sotsial’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti: Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge]. Moscow: Medium Publ., 323 p.
Bobkov, V.N. and Odintsova, E.V. (2019). Srednie klassy v sotsial’noy strukture zanyatogo naseleniya v Rossii [Middle classes in the social structure of Russia’s working population]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. No. 29, pp. 58–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2019.29.2.576
Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva [Social Space]. Saint-Petersburg: Alteya Publ., 288 p.
Bystrova, T.Yu., Pevnaya, M.V. and Papulova, A.A. (2018). Resursy kul’turnoy regeneratsii ural’skikh gorodov v otsenkalh molodogo pokoleniya gorozhan [Resources of cultural regeneration in the Ural minor cities: public opinion of citizens’ youth]. Voprosy upravleniya [Management Issues]. No. 6, iss. 36, pp. 177–187. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki [Federal State Statistics Service]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/ (accessed 29.07.2019).
Fedotova, N.G. (2017). Formirovanie gorodskoy identichnosti: faktornyy i institutsional’nyy aspekty [The formation of urban identity: factorial and institutional aspects]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. No. 20, iss. 3, p. 32–49.
Filippov, A.F. (2008). Sotsiologiya prostranstva [Sociology of space]. Saint-Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 290 p.
Gorshkov, M.K. and Tikhonova, N.E (eds.) (2016). Rossiyskoe obschestvo i vyzovy vremeni. Kniga tret’ya [Russian society and challenges of the time. Book three]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir Publ., 424 p.
Hillier, B. (2008). Space and spatiality: what the built environment needs from social theory. Building Research and Information. No. 36, vol. 3, p. 216–230.
Jeon, J.Y., Lee, P.J., Hong, J.Y., Lavandier, C., et al. (2017). A cross-national comparison in assessment of urban park soundscapes in France, Korea, and Sweden through laboratory experiments. Applied Acoustics. No. 130, p. 107-117. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.016
Korableva, G.B. and Merenkov, A.V. (eds.) (2015). Sotsial’noe prostranstvo sovremennogo goroda [Social space of the modern city]. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publ., 252 p.
Law, J. (2006). Ob’ekty i prostranstva [Objects and space]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review]. Vol. 5, no. 1, p. 30–42.
Lefebvre, H. (2002). Proizvodstvo prostranstva [The production of space]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review]. Vol. 2, no. 3, p. 27–29.
Radina, N.K. and Porshnev, A.V. (2014). Pozhilye gorozhane megapolisov i malykh gorodov: solidarnost’, al’truizm i prioritety v oblasti gorodskogo razvitiya [Older city-dweller of the city and the «small towns»: solidarity, altruism and priorities in the sphere of urban development]. Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power] No. 3, p. 141–158.
Saraf, M. (2011). Kul’turnoe prostranstvo kak predmet issledovaniya [Cultural apace as a subject of research]. Prostranstvo i vremya [Space and Time]. No. 4(6), p. 15–19.
Shtompka, P. (2005). Sotsiologiya: Analiz sovremennogo obschestva [Sociology: an analysis of modern society]. Moscow: Logos Publ., 664 p. Svodnye itogi Vserossiyskoy perepisi naseleniya 2010 goda. Razdel 2. Uroven’ obrazovaniya naseleniya [Summary results of the 2010 All-Russian population census. Section 2. The level of education of the population]. Available at: https://www.gks.ru/ free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/vol4pdf-m.html (accessed 22.07.2019).
Tikhonova, N.E. (2014). Faktory stratifikatsii v sovremennoy Rossii: dinamika sravnitel’noy znachimosti [The stratification factors in contemporary Russia: the dynamics of comparative significance]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10, pp. 23–35.
Van’ke, A.V. and Polukhina, E.V. (2018). Territtorial’naya identichnost’ v industrial’nykh rayonakh: kul’turnye praktiki zavodskikh rabochikh i deyateley sovremennogo iskusstva [Territorial identities in industrial: cultural practices of factory workers and contemporary art communities]. Laboratorium: Zhurnal sotsial’nykh issledovaniy [Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research]. No. 10(3), p. 4– 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2018- 10-3-4-34
Zaborova, E.N. and Islamova, A.F. (2013). Gorod kak sotsial’noe prostranstvo [City as a social space]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2, pp. 97–101.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
