Rural life in Russia: modern and historical discourse
Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-2-259-272Keywords:
peasants, rural areas, redistribution of land, social desertification, territorial statistics, programs of territorial investigations, self-governmentAbstract
The problems concerning the development of rural areas and their key productive force — peasants — are not central to the sociological discourse of modern Russian science. At present, there are not many scientists focusing on socio-structural processes in Russian villages, including the changes in the social status, life world, and existential self-awareness of peasants. Meanwhile, some fundamental changes have taken place there over the post-Soviet period. They have had an impact on the society in general and altered the cultural, demographic, and anthropogenic landscape of the country. According to statistical data, the rural population has increased in Russia, while the number of those employed in agriculture has substantially reduced. We see the asymmetry of urbanistic processes with the high unemployment rate in rural areas of individual regions. There has occurred redistribution of land, including reduction of farming lands and concentration of land in the hands of agricultural holdings and large farm enterprises. The number of functioning small private farms has decreased, while their owners gradually join the group of wage employees or «precarium». These processes result in increasing social desertification: medical, educational, and cultural institutions rendering services to local population are being liquidated, while the transport accessibility of villages is reducing. The scale and consequences of this phenomenon have been insufficiently studied in sociological literature, especially with regard to the development of self-government in rural areas. We consider it timely to recall the practice of zemstvo (local municipal administration in Tsarist Russia) and achievements of zemsky (territorial) statistics that studied the life of peasants in post-reform Russia. Territorial statistical investigations played an important role in the development of scientific and theoretical framework for studying villages and peasants, as well as laid the foundation for sociology of rural areas in Russia. In practical terms, these studies brought transparency into the perception of issues associated with socio-economic differentiation in villages, distribution of land, labor migration, as well as meeting the needs of peasants in healthcare, educational institutions, etc. Territorial statistical specialists mastered the expeditionary method of data collection, a prototype of modern «field» surveys used in sociology. The activities of territorial councils as self-government bodies can provide an example of successful local initiative aimed at the development of Russia’s rural areas at the present stage.References
Абрамов В.Ф. Земская статистика народного образования // Социологические исследования. 1996. № 9. С. 83–87.
Барсукова С.Ю. Дилемма «фермеры–агрохолдинги» в контексте импортозамещения // Общественные науки и современность. 2016. № 5. С. 63–74.
Беляева Л.А. От изучения сельской общины к социологии села // Эмпирическая социология в России и Восточной Европе. М.: Изд. дом ГУ-ВШЭ. 2004. С. 51–71.
Дорофеева О.П. Общественно-политическая деятельность Ф.А. Щербины в Воронежском крае в конце XIX – начале XX веков: дис. … канд. ист. наук. Воронеж, 2007. 253 с.
Елисеева И.И., Дмитриев А.Л. История российской государственной статистики: 1811–2011 / Росстат. М.: Статистика России, 2013. 143 с.
Журавский Д.П. План статистического описания губерний Киевского учебного округа. Киев, 1851. 59 с.
Итоги Всероссийской сельскохозяйственной переписи 2016 года: в 8 т. Т. 1: Основные итоги Всероссийской сельскохозяйственной переписи 2016 года / Федеральная служба гос. статистики. М.: ИИЦ «Статистика России», 2018. Кн. 1. 458 с.
Куркин П.И. Земская санитарная статистика: Опыт построения ее схемы. М., 1912. 35 с.
Куркин П.И. Статистика движения населения Московской губернии в 1883–1897 гг. М., 1902. 562 с.
Пирумова Н.М. Земское либеральное движение. Социальные корни и эволюция до начала ХХ века. М.: Наука, 1977. 288 с.
Положение о губернских и уездных земских учреждениях от 1 января 1864 года // Полное собрании законов Российской империи. Собр. Отд. I. Т. 39, № 40457. С. 1–10.
Программа для собирания сведений о сельской поземельной общине, выработанная III Отделением Вольного экономического общества. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. СПб., 1879. 60 с.
Рашин А.Г. Грамотность и народное образование в XIX и в начале XX в. // Исторические записки. 1951. Т. 37. С. 126–147.
Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели 2018: стат. сб. / Росстат. М., 2018. 1162 с.
Ровбель С.В. Земская статистика и развитие эмпирической социологии в России // Идеи и идеалы. 2015. Т. 2, № 4. С. 133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2015-4.2-133-145.
Романова Е.К. Состояние и динамика развития земельного фонда РФ // Инновационная экономика: матер. III Междунар. науч. конф. (г. Казань, октябрь 2016 г.). Казань: Бук, 2016. С. 6–10.
Семенов П.П. Мураевенская волость // Сборник материалов для изучения сельскопоземельной общины в России / Изд. Императорского Вольно-экономического общества. СПБ., 1880. С. 37–158.
Сорокин П.А. Программа по изучению зырянского края // Социологические исследования. 1990. № 2. С. 139–141.
Социальное положение и уровень жизни населения России – 2017 / Федеральная служба государственной статистики. URL: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b17_44/Main.htm (дата обращения: 25.02.2019).
Толстова Ю.Н. Возросла ли эффективность методов социологических исследований в России за последние 100 лет? // Социологические исследования. 2013. № 7. С. 59–69.
Тощенко Ж.Т., Великий П.П. Основные смыслы жизненного мира сельских жителей России // Мир России. 2018. Т. 27, № 1. С. 7–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-1-7-33.
Численность и размещение населения / Всероссийская перепесь населения 2010. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/perepis_itogi1612.htm (дата обращения: 25.02.2019).
References
Abramov, V.F. (1996). Zemskaya statistika narodnogo obrazovaniya [Zemstvo statistics of public education]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9, pp. 83–87.
Barsukova, S.Yu. (2016). Dilemma «fermery–agrokholdingi» v kontekste importozamescheniya [The dilemma of the «farmers vs agricultural holdings» in the context of import substitution]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Sociological Research]. No. 5, p. 63–74.
Belyaeva, L.A. (2004). Ot izucheniya sel’skoy obschiny k sotsiologii sela [From the study of the rural community to the sociology of the village]. Empiricheskaya sotsiologiya v Rossii i Vostochnoy Evrope [Empirical sociology in Russia and Eastern Europe]. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 51–71.
Chislennost’ i razmeshcheniye naseleniya [Population size and distribution]. Vserossiyskaya perepis’ naseleniya 2010 [All-Russian Population Census 2010]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/perepis_itogi1612.htm (accessed 25.02.2019).
Dorofeeva, O.P. (2007). Obschestvenno-politicheskaya deyatel’nost’ F.A. Scherbiny v Voronezhskom krae v kontse XIX – nachale XX vekov: dis. … kand. ist. nauk [Social and political activity of F. A. Shcherbina in the Voronezh region in the late 19th – early 20th centuries: dissertation]. Voronezh, 253 p.
Eliseeva, I.I. and Dmitriev, A.L. (2013). Istoriya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennoy statistiki: 1811–2011 [History of the Russian state statistics: 1811–2011]. Moscow: Statistics of Russia Publ., 143 p.
Itogi Vserossiyskoy sel’skokhozyaystvennoy perepisi 2016 goda: v 8 t. T. 1: Osnovnyye itogi Vserossiyskoy sel’skokhozyaystvennoy perepisi 2016 goda [The results of the All-Russian Agricultural Census 2016: in 8 vols. Vol. 1: The main results of the All-Russian Agricultural Census 2016]. Federal State Statistics Service, Moscow: Statistika Rossii, book 1, 458 p.
Kurkin, P.I. (1902). Statistika dvizheniya naseleniya Moskovskoy gubernii v 1883–1897 gg. [Statistics of population movement in Moscow province in 1883–1897]. Moscow, 562 p.
Kurkin, P.I. (1912). Zemskaya sanitarnaya statistika: Opyt postroeniya ee skhemy [Zemstvo sanitary statistics: the Experience of building its scheme]. Moscow, 35 p.
Pirumova, N.M. (1977). Zemskoe liberal’noe dvizhenie. Sotsial’nyye korni i evolyutsiya do nachala 20 veka [Zemstvo liberal movement. Social roots and evolution until the beginning of the 20th century]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 288 p.
Polozhenie o gubernskikh i uezdnykh zemskikh uchrezhdeniyakh ot 1 yanvarya 1864 goda [Regulations on the provincial and district zemstvo institutions from January 1, 1864]. Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiyskoy imperii [Complete collection of laws of the Russian empire]. Dep 1, vol. 39, no. 40457, pp. 1–10.
Programma dlya sobiraniya svedeniy o sel’skoy pozemel’noy obschine, vyrabotannaya III Otdeleniyem Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva (1879) [Program for collecting information about the rural land community, developed by the 3rd Division of the Free Economic Society]. Saint-Petersburg, 60 p.
Rashin, A.G. (1951). Gramotnost’ i narodnoe obrazovanie v XIX i v nachale XX v. [Literacy and public education in the 19th and early 20th century]. Istoricheskie zapiski [Historical notes]. Vol. 37, pp. 126–147.
Regiony Rossii. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye pokazateli 2018: stat. sb. [Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators 2018]. Rosstat, Moscow, 2018, 1162 p.
Romanova, E.K. (2016). Sostoyanie i dinamika razvitiya zemel’nogo fonda RF [State and dynamics of the land Fund of the Russian Federation]. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: materialy III Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Kazan’, oktyabr’ 2016 g.) [Innovation economy: proceedings of the 3rd International scientific conference (Kazan, October 2016)]. Kazan: Buk Publ., pp. 6–10.
Rovbel’, S.V. (2015). Zemskaya statistika i razvitie empiricheskoy sotsiologii v Rossii [Territorial statistics and development of empiric sociology in Russia]. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals]. Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2015-4.2-133-145.
Semenov, P.P. (1880). Muraevenskaya volost’ [Muraevensk volost]. Sbornik materialov dlya izucheniya sel’skopozemel’noy obschiny [Collection of materials for the study of the agricultural community]. Saint-Petersburg: The Imperial Free Economic Society Publ., pp. 37–158.
Sorokin P.A. (1990). Programma po izucheniyu zyryanskogo kraya [Program for the study of the Zyryan region]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2, pp.139–141.
Sotsial’noye polozheniye i uroven’ zhizni naseleniya Rossii – 2017 [Social status and standard of living of the population of Russia – 2017]. Federal State Statistics Service. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b17_44/Main.htm (accessed 25.02.2019).
Tolstova, Yu.N. (2013). Vozrosla li effektivnost’ metodov sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy v Rossii za poslednie 100 let? [Has research methods effectiveness grown in Russian sociology for the last 100 years?]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7, pp. 59–69.
Toschenko, Zh.T. and Velikiy, P.P. (2018). Osnovnye smysly zhiznennogo mira sel’skikh zhiteley Rossii [The key meanings of the lifeworld of rural residents in Russia]. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. No. 1, pp. 7–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-1-7-33.
Zhuravskiy, D.P. (1851). Plan statisticheskogo opisaniya guberniy Kievskogo uchebnogo okruga [A plan for a statistical description of the provinces of the Kiev educational district]. Kiev, 59 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
