Interconnection between personality’s responsibility and procrastination in early and late adolescence
Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-2-259-269Keywords:
personality, responsibility, procrastination, will, volitional qualities, age, development, education, activity, vital activityAbstract
Due to the digitalization of society and culture and the consequently accelerating pace of life, the modern man faces the need to solve many problems. Adolescents, as being persons at their formation stage, having become multi-tasking, cannot fully cope with the situation that has arisen due to the lack of self-regulation mechanisms, personal traits and qualities. This problem influenced the choice of the topic of our study. The study of the relationship between personality’s responsibility and procrastination in adolescence through volitional qualities is of practical importance for the effective organization of the educational process and provision of psychological and pedagogical support for students of this age within the process. Responsibility is understood in the paper as the control performed by an individual in various forms of activity from the standpoint of the norms and rules accepted by this individual. We investigated procrastination as a process of voluntary postponement of various activities by a person despite the expected negative consequences. There was revealed a relationship among the indicators of responsibility, procrastination and volitional qualities in the period from early to late adolescence, which intensifies and differs in the number of indicators, in the strength and nature of the relationship. For early adolescence, there were detected significant, strong correlations between the indicator of responsibility in present and the indicator of volitional qualities (self-discipline), while for the period of late adolescence we revealed significant correlations of the responsibility indicator with the indicators of volitional qualities (self-discipline, perseverance), as well as between the responsibility indicator with the procrastination indicator and the indicator of volitional quality (perseverance).References
Абульханова К.А. Психология и сознание личности (проблемы методологии, теории и исследования реальной личности). М.: МОДЭК, 1999. 224 с.
Агеев B.C. Атрибуция ответственности за успех или неудачу группы в межгрупповом взаимодействии // Вопросы психологии. 1982. № 6. С. 101–106.
Дементий Л.И. К проблеме меры ответственности // Личность. Культура. Общество. 2004. Т. 6, № 3. С. 264–274.
Карловская Н.Н., Баранова Р.А. Взаимосвязь общей и академической прокрастинации и тревожности у студентов с разной академической успеваемостью // Психология в вузе. 2008. № 3. С. 38–49.
Киселева М.А. Особенности проявления прокрастинации личности // Роль прокрастинации в процессе самоопределения молодежи: сб. науч. статей. Саратов: Саратовский источник. 2015. С. 31–34.
Киселева М.А., Карина О.В., Шустова Н.Е. Проблема влияния прокрастинации на процесс самоопределения личности // Personality and social development: materials of the II International scientific conference (March 29–30 2014). Prague: Sociosféra-CZ, 2014. P. 22–27.
Клейберг Ю.А. Прокрастинация: девиантологический контекст проблемы // Роль прокрастинации в процессе самоопределения молодежи: сб. науч. статей. Саратов: Саратовский источник, 2015. С. 34–40.
Ковылин В.С. Теоретические основы изучения феномена прокрастинации // Личность в меняющемся мире: здоровье, адаптация, развитие. 2013. № 2(2). С. 22–41.
Компетентностный подход в педагогическом образовании / под ред. В.А. Козырева, Н.Ф. Радионовой, А.П. Тряпицыной. СПб.: Изд-во РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена, 2006. 392 с.
Муздыбаев К. Психология ответственности. Л.: Наука, 1983. 240 с.
Посохова С.Т. Лень: психологическое содержание и проявления // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 12. Психология. Социология. Педагогика. 2011. № 2. С. 159–166.
Прядеин В.П. Ответственность как системное качество личности: учеб. пособие. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. гос. пед. ун-та, 2001. 209 с.
Шаров А.С. Психология культуры, образования и развития человека: учеб. пособие. Омск: Изд-во ОмГПУ, 2013. 300 с.
Lay C.H. At last, my research article on procrastination // Journal of Research in Personality. 1986. Vol. 20, iss. 4. P. 474–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(86)90127-3
References
Abul’khanova, K.A. (1999). Psikhologiya i soznanie lichnosti (problemy metodologii, teorii i issledovaniya real’noy lichnosti) [Psychology and consciousness of the individual (problems of methodology, theory and research of a real person)]. Moscow: MODEK Publ., 224 p.
Ageev, V.S. (1982). Atributsiya otvetstvennosti za uspekh ili neudachu gruppy v mezhgruppovom vzaimodeystvii [Attribution of responsibility for the success or failure of a group in intergroup interaction]. Voprosy psikhologii. No. 6, pp. 101–106.
Dementiy, L.I. (2010). K problemam mery otvetstvennosti [To problems of a measure of responsibility]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obschestvo [Person. Culture. Society]. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 264–274.
Karlovskaya, N.N. and Baranova, R.A. (2008). Vzaimosvyaz’ obschey i akademicheskoy prokrastinatsii i trevozhnosti u studentov s raznoy akademicheskoy uspevayemost’yu [The relationship of general and academic procrastination and anxiety in students with different academic performance]. Psikhologiya v vuze [Psychology at the University]. No. 3, pp. 38–49.
Kiseleva, M.A. (2015). Osobennosti proyavleniya prokrastinatsii lichnosti [Features of the manifestation of personality procrastination]. Rol’ prokrastinatsii v protsesse samoopredeleniya molodezhi [The role of procrastination in the process of youth self-determination]. Saratov: Saratovskiy Istochnik Publ., pp. 31–34.
Kiseleva, M.A., Karina, O.V. and Shustova, N.E. (2014). Problema vliyaniya prokrastinatsii na protsess samoopredeleniya lichnosti [The problem of the influence of procrastination on the process of self-determination of personality]. Personality and social development: materials of the II International scientific conference (March 29–30 2014). Prague: Sociosféra-CZ, pp. 22–27.
Kleiberg, Yu.A. (2015). Prokrastinatsiya: deviantologicheskiy kontekst problemy [Procrastination: the deviantological context of the problem]. Rol’ prokrastinatsii v protsesse samoopredeleniya molodezhi [The role of procrastination in the process of youth self-determination]. Saratov: Saratovskiy Istochnik Publ., pp. 34–40.
Kovylin, V.S. (2013). Teoreticheskiye osnovy izucheniya fenomena prokrastinatsii [Theoretical foundations of the study of the phenomenon of procrastination]. Lichnost’ v menyayuschemsya mire: zdorov’e, adaptatsiya, razvitie [Personality in a Changing World: Health, Adaptation, Development]. No. 2(2), pp. 22–41.
Kozyrev, V.A., Radionova, N.F. and Tryapitsyna, A.P. (eds.) (2006). Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii [Competency-based approach in teacher education]. Saint Petersburg: Herzen University Publ., 392 p.
Lay, C.H. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 20, iss. 4, pp. 474–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(86)90127-3
Muzdybaev, K. (1983). Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti [Psychology of responsibility]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 240 p.
Posokhova, S.T. (2011). Len’, psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie i proyavleniya [Sloth, psychological content and manifestations]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika [Vestnik of St. Petersburg State University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy]. No. 2, pp. 159–166.
Pryadein, V.P. (2001). Otvetstvennost’ kak sistemnoe kachestvo lichnosti [Responsibility as a systemic quality of personality]. Yekaterinburg: USPU Publ., 209 p.
Sharov, A.S. (2013). Psikhologiya kul’tury, obrazovaniya i razvitiya cheloveka [Psychology of culture, education and human development]. Omsk: OmSPU Publ., 300 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
