Implicit predictions of marriage satisfaction based on perception of expressive features
Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-628-642Keywords:
implicit theories, social perception, extraversion, benevolence, Big Five, marital satisfactionAbstract
The paper deals with the problem of determining the zones of predictive accuracy of everyday perception. We studied implicit representations of women about the satisfaction with marriage among males with contrasting personality traits. The research involved 100 females aged from 17 to 48 (M = 22.11, SD = 4.23). At the first stage, the respondents filled out the Big Five-2 questionnaire. After that, they studied the responses to the same questionnaire supposedly given by a man with one of the four traits vividly expressed: extraversion, introversion, benevolence, or hostility. The participants were then asked to fill out the Marriage Satisfaction Questionnaire in the way they thought this man would do it. The data were analyzed using ANOVA. It was found that women attribute the same level of satisfaction with marriage to extroverted and introverted men. These judgments appear to be based on a projection mechanism, which is manifested in the fact that subjects with high extraversion predict a more successful marriage for an extrovert, and introverted subjects attribute an equally successful marriage to both an introvert and an extrovert. Thus, taking the projective intervention into account, it can be concluded that the implicit theory of the extraverted personality is consistent with research data on links between extraversion and subjective well-being. Women also ascribed significantly higher marital satisfaction to the benevolent men than to the hostile ones. This indicates that the implicit theory of benevolent personality does not reproduce the objective variability of interpersonal interaction scenarios of such a personality. The results obtained expand the understanding of the implicit theories limitations and can be helpful in preventing cognitive distortions in the field of social perception.References
Баландина Л.Л. Удовлетворенность браком в системе родительско-детских и супружеских отношений // Вестник Пермского государственного гуманитарно-педагогического университета. Серия № 1. Психологические и педагогические науки. 2014. № 1. С. 125–136.
Балева М.В., Ковалева Г.В., Полянина О.И. Житейские представления о личности Другого с яркой выраженностью темнотриадических черт. Сравнение с данными научных исследований // Вестник РГГУ. Серия: Психология. Педагогика. Образование. 2019. № 2. С. 51–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2019-2-51-76
Гаврилова Е.А. Психологическая категория «отношения» как основополагающая для изучения гармоничного брака // Социосфера. 2011. № 1. С. 27–32.
Дмитрук Ю.Ю. Идентификация личности в супружеской паре как фактор субъективного благополучия семейных отношений: дис. … канд. психол. наук. Петропавловск-Камчатский, 2004. 282 c.
Канеман Д. Думай медленно… решай быстро. М.: АСТ, 2017. 656 с.
Никотина Т.А. Влияние экстраверсии и интроверсии на построение межличностных отношений в юношеском возрасте // Молодежная наука: тенденции развития. 2017. № 4. С. 47–53.
Сагилян Э.М. Влияние особенностей темпераментов супругов на уровень их межличностной совместимости // Гуманитарные исследования в ХХI веке. 2019. № 3. С. 32–37.
Сычев О.А. Социально-психологические факторы удовлетворенности отношениями в молодых супружеских парах // Социальная психология и общество. 2017. Т. 8, № 1. С. 56–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080104
Тест-опросник удовлетворенности браком // Психологические тесты: в 2 т. / под ред. А.А. Карелина. М.: ВЛАДОС, 2001. Т. 2. С. 173–179.
Фомина О.О. Межличностные предикторы психологического благополучия // Мир науки, культуры, образования. 2017. № 1(62). С. 226–229.
Ambady N., Hallahan M., Rosenthal R. On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995. Vol. 69, no. 3. P. 518–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.518
Bäckström M., Björklund F. Is the general factor of personality really related to frequency of agreeable, conscientious, emotionally stable, extraverted, and open behavior? An experience sampling study // Journal of Individual Differences. 2021. Vol. 42, no. 3. P. 148–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000341
Barrett L.F., Pietromonaco P.R. Accuracy of the five-factor model in predicting perceptions of daily social interactions // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997. Vol. 23, iss. 11. P. 1173–1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972311005
Beebe J. Extraversion-Introversion (Jung’s Theory) // Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences / ed. by V. Zeigler-Hill, T. Shackelford. N.Y.; Cham: Springer, 2016. URL: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-28099-8_1073-1 (accessed: 16.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1073-1
Berry D.S., Hansen J.S. Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996. Vol. 71, no. 4. P. 796–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.796
Bleidorn W., Hopwood C.J., Lucas R.E. Life events and personality trait change // Journal of Personality. 2018. Vol. 86, iss. 1. P. 83–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12286
Branje S.J.T., van Lieshout C.F.M., van Aken M.A.G. Relations Between Big Five Personality Characteristics and Perceived Support in Adolescents’ Families // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 86, no. 4. P. 615–628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.615
Bruner J.S., Tagiuri R. The perception of people // Handbook of social psychology / ed. by G. Lindzey. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954. Vol. 2. P. 634–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0024982
Busby D.M., Carroll J.S., Willoughby B.J. Compatibility or restraint? The effects of sexual timing on marriage relationships // Journal of Family Psychology. 2010. Vol. 24, no. 6. P. 766–774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021690
Côté S., Moskowitz D.S. On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998. Vol. 75, no. 4. P. 1032–1046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.1032
Denissen J.J., Luhmann M., Chung J.M., Bleidorn W. Transactions between life events and personality traits across the adult lifespan // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2019. Vol. 116, no. 4. P. 612–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000196
Dunning D., Griffin D.W., Milojkovic J.D., Ross L. The overconfidence effect in social prediction // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. Vol. 58, no. 4. P. 568–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.568
Dyrenforth P.S., Kashy D.A., Donnellan M.B., Lucas R.E. Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010. Vol. 99, no. 4. P. 690–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020385
Fanti K.A., Colins O.F., Andershed H., Sikki M. Stability and change in callous-unemotional traits: Longitudinal associations with potential individual and contextual risk and protective factors // American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2017. Vol. 87, no. 1. P. 62–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000143
Field R.D., Tobin R.M., Reese-Weber M. Agreeableness, social self-efficacy, and conflict resolution strategies // Journal of Individual Differences. 2014. Vol. 35, no. 2. P. 95–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000131
Fisher T.D., McNulty J.K. Neuroticism and marital satisfaction: The mediating role played by the sexual relationship // Journal of Family Psychology. 2008. Vol. 22, no. 1. P. 112–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.112
Fleeson W., Law M.K. Trait enactments as density distributions: The role of actors, situations, and observers in explaining stability and variability // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2015. Vol. 109, no. 6. P. 1090–1104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039517
Funder D.C., Dobroth K.M. Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. Vol. 52, no. 2. P. 409–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.409
Hsu M., Krajbich I., Zhao C., Camerer C.F. Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities // The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009. Vol. 29, iss. 7. P. 2231–2237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5296-08.2009
Hutteman R., Hennecke M., Orth U., Reitz A.K., Specht J. Developmental tasks as a framework to study personality development in adulthood and old age // European Journal of Personality. 2014. Vol. 28, iss. 3. P. 267–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1959
Lavner J.A., Weiss B., Miller J.D., Karney B.R. Personality change among newlyweds: Patterns, predictors, and associations with marital satisfaction over time // Developmental Psychology. 2018. Vol. 54, no. 6. P. 1172–1185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000491
Lucas R.E., Fujita F. Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 79, no. 6. P. 1039–1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1039
Margolis S., Lyubomirsky S. Experimental manipulation of extraverted and introverted behavior and its effects on well-being // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2020. Vol. 149, iss. 4. P. 719–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000668
Miller P.C., Lefcourt H.M., Holmes J.G., Ware E.E., Saleh W.E. Marital locus of control and marital problem solving // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986. Vol. 51, no. 1. P. 161–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.161
Mongrain M., Barnes C., Barnhart R., Zalan L.B. Acts of kindness reduce depression in individuals low on agreeableness // Translational Issues in Psychological Science. 2018. Vol. 4, no. 3. P. 323–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000168
Neff L.A., Karney B.R. Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. Vol. 97, no. 3. P. 435–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015663
Pinazo D., Barrós-Loscertales A., Peris R., Ventura-Campos N., Ávila C. Neuroticism predisposes to donation more than agreeableness: An fMRI study // Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics. 2016. Vol. 9, iss. 2. P. 100–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000054
Rantanen J., Pulkkinen L., Kinnunen U. The Big Five personality dimensions, work-family conflict, and psychological distress: a longitudinal view // Journal of Individual Differences. 2005. Vol. 26, no. 3. P. 155–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.26.3.155
Ross L., Nisbett R.E. The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. London, UK: Pinter & Martin Ltd., 2011. 320 p.
Shchebetenko S.A., Kalugin A.Y., Mishkevich A.M., Soto C.J., John O.P. Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence from the Russian version // Assessment. 2020. Vol. 27, iss. 3. P. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901
Sinn D.L., Moltschaniwskyj N.A. Personality traits in Dumpling Squid (Euprymna tasmanica): context-specific traits and their correlation with biological characteristics // Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2005. Vol. 119, no. 1. P. 99–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.99
Smillie L.D., Cooper A.J., Wilt J., Revelle W. Do extraverts get more bang for the buck? Refining the affective-reactivity hypothesis of extraversion // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012. Vol. 103, no. 2. P. 306–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028372
Smillie L.D., Wilt J., Kabbani R., Garratt C., Revelle W. Quality of social experience explains the relation between extraversion and positive affect // Emotion. 2015. Vol. 15, no. 3. P. 339–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000047
Specht J. Personality development in reaction to major life events // Personality Development across the Lifespan / ed. by J. Specht. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, 2017. P. 341–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804674-6.00021-1
Stricker L.J., Jacobs P.I., Kogan N. Trait interrelations in implicit personality theories and questionnaire data // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974. Vol. 30, no. 2. P. 198–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036646
Vazire S. Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010. Vol. 98, no. 2. P. 281–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
Warren P.A., Gostoli U., Farmer G.D., El-Deredy W., Hahn U. A re-examination of «bias» in human randomness perception // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2018. Vol. 44, iss. 5. P. 663–680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000462
Whisman M.A. Dyadic perspectives on trauma and marital quality // Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2014. Vol. 6, no. 3. P. 207–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036143
References
Ambady, N., Hallahan, M. and Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 518–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.518
Bäckström, M. and Björklund, F. (2021). Is the general factor of personality really related to frequency of agreeable, conscientious, emotionally stable, extraverted, and open behavior? An experience sampling study. Journal of Individual Differences. Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 148–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000341
Balandina, L.L. (2014). [Contentment in matrimony in the system of parent-child and spousal relationships]. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya № 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences]. No. 1. pp. 125–136.
Baleva, M.V., Kovaleva, G.V. and Polyanina, O.I. (2019). [Implicit judgments about the Other with vivid manifestations of dark triad traits. Comparison with research data]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie» [RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series: Psychology. Pedagogics. Education]. No. 2, pp. 51–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2019-2-51-76
Barrett, L.F. and Pietromonaco, P.R. (1997). Accuracy of the five-factor model in predicting perceptions of daily social interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 23, iss. 11, pp. 1173–1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972311005
Beebe, J. (2016). Extraversion-Introversion (Jung’s Theory). Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, ed. by V. Zeigler-Hill, T. Shackelford. New York, Cham: Springer Publ. Available at:https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-28099-8_1073-1 (accessed: 16.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1073-1
Berry, D.S. and Hansen, J.S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 796–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.796
Bleidorn, W., Hopwood, C.J. and Lucas, R.E. (2018). Life events and personality trait change. Journal of Personality. Vol. 86, iss. 1, pp. 83–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12286
Branje, S.J.T., van Lieshout, C.F.M. and van Aken, M.A.G. (2004). Relations between Big Five personality characteristics and perceived support in adolescents’ families. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 615–628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.615
Bruner, J.S. and Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. Handbook of social psychology, ed. by G. Lindzey. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publ., vol. 2, pp. 634–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0024982
Busby, D.M., Carroll, J.S. and Willoughby, B.J. (2010). Compatibility or restraint? The effects of sexual timing on marriage relationships. Journal of Family Psychology. Vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 766–774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021690
Côté, S. and Moskowitz, D.S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1032–1046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.1032
Denissen, J.J., Luhmann, M., Chung, J.M. and Bleidorn, W. (2019). Transactions between life events and personality traits across the adult lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 612–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000196
Dmitruk, Yu.Yu. (2004). Identifikatsiya lichnosti v supruzheskoi pare kak faktor sub’ektivnogo blagopoluchiya semeinykh otnoshenii: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Personal identification in a married couples as a factor of the family relations subjective well-being: dissertation]. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 282 p.
Dunning, D., Griffin, D.W., Milojkovic, J.D. and Ross, L. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 568–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.568
Dyrenforth, P.S., Kashy, D.A., Donnellan, M.B. and Lucas, R.E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 690–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020385
Fanti, K.A., Colins, O.F., Andershed, H. and Sikki, M. (2017). Stability and change in callous-unemotional traits: Longitudinal associations with potential individual and contextual risk and protective factors. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. Vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 62–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000143
Field, R.D., Tobin, R.M. and Reese-Weber, M. (2014). Agreeableness, social self-efficacy, and conflict resolution strategies. Journal of Individual Differences. Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 95–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000131
Fisher, T.D. and McNulty, J.K. (2008). Neuroticism and marital satisfaction: The mediating role played by the sexual relationship. Journal of Family Psychology. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 112–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.112
Fleeson, W. and Law, M.K. (2015). Trait enactments as density distributions: The role of actors, situations, and observers in explaining stability and variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 1090–1104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039517
Fomina, O.O. (2017). [Interpersonal predictors of psychological well-being]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya [The World of Science, Culture and Education]. No. 1(62), pp. 226–229.
Funder, D.C. and Dobroth, K.M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 409–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.409
Gavrilova, E.A. (2011). [Psychological category «relations» as the basis of harmonious marriage]. Sotsiosfera [Sociosphere]. No. 1, pp. 27–32.
Hsu, M., Krajbich, I., Zhao, C. and Camerer, C.F. (2009). Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities. The Journal of Neuroscience. Vol. 29, iss. 7, pp. 2231–2237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5296-08.2009
Hutteman, R., Hennecke, M., Orth, U., Reitz, A.K. and Specht, J. (2014). Developmental tasks as a framework to study personality development in adulthood and old age. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 28, iss. 3, pp. 267–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1959
Kaneman, D. (2017). Dumay medlenno… reshay bystro [Thinking, fast and slow]. Moscow: AST Publ., 656 p.
Karelin, A.A. (ed.) (2001). [Marriage satisfaction questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskie testy: v 2 t. [Psychological tests: in 2 vols]. Moscow: VLADOS Publ., vol. 2, pp. 173–179.
Lavner, J.A., Weiss, B., Miller, J.D. and Karney, B.R. (2018). Personality change among newlyweds: Patterns, predictors, and associations with marital satisfaction over time. Developmental Psychology. Vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1172–1185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000491
Lucas, R.E. and Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 1039–1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1039
Margolis, S. and Lyubomirsky, S. (2020). Experimental manipulation of extraverted and introverted behavior and its effects on well-being. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Vol. 149, iss. 4, pp. 719–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000668
Miller, P.C., Lefcourt, H.M., Holmes, J.G., Ware, E.E. and Saleh, W.E. (1986). Marital locus of control and marital problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 161–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.161
Mongrain, M., Barnes, C., Barnhart, R. and Zalan, L.B. (2018). Acts of kindness reduce depression in individuals low on agreeableness. Translational Issues in Psychological Science. Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 323–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000168
Neff, L.A. and Karney, B.R. (2009). Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 435–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015663
Nikotina, T.A. (2017). [The influence of extraversion and introversion on the construction of interpersonal relationships in adolescence]. Molodezhnaya nauka: tendentsii razvitiya [Youth Science: Development Trends]. No. 4, pp. 47–53.
Pinazo, D., Barrós-Loscertales, A., Peris, R., Ventura-Campos, N. and Ávila, C. (2016). Neuroticism predisposes to donation more than agreeableness: An fMRI study. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics. Vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 100–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000054
Rantanen, J., Pulkkinen, L. and Kinnunen, U. (2005). The Big Five personality dimensions, work-family conflict, and psychological distress: a longitudinal view. Journal of Individual Differences. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 155–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.26.3.155
Ross, L., Nisbett, R.E. (2011). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. London: Pinter & Martin Publ., 320 p.
Sagilyan, E.M. (2019). [Influence of the characteristics of the spouses’ temperaments on the level of their interpersonal compatibility]. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v XXI veke [Humanities Research in the 21 Century]. No. 3, pp. 32–37.
Schebetenko, S.A., Kalugin, A.Yu., Mishkevich, A.M., Soto, C.J. and John, O.P. (2019). Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence from the Russian version. Assessment. Vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901
Sinn, D.L. and Moltschaniwskyj, N.A. (2005). Personality traits in Dumpling Squid (Euprymna tasmanica): context-specific traits and their correlation with biological characteristics. Journal of Comparative Psychology. Vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 99–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.99
Smillie, L.D., Cooper, A.J., Wilt, J. and Revelle, W. (2012). Do extraverts get more bang for the buck? Refining the affective-reactivity hypothesis of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 306–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028372
Smillie, L.D., Wilt, J., Kabbani, R., Garratt, C. and Revelle, W. (2015). Quality of social experience explains the relation between extraversion and positive affect. Emotion. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 339–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000047
Specht, J. (2017). Personality development in reaction to major life events. Personality development across the lifespan. San Diego: Elsevier Publ., pp. 341–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804674-6.00021-1
Stricker, L.J., Jacobs, P.I. and Kogan, N. (1974). Trait interrelations in implicit personality theories and questionnaire data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 198–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036646
Sychev, O.A. (2017). [Sociopsychological factors affecting the relationship satisfaction in young married couples]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obschestvo [Social Psychology and Society]. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 56–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080104
Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 281–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
Warren, P.A., Gostoli, U., Farmer, G.D., El-Deredy, W. and Hahn, U. (2018). A re-examination of «bias» in human randomness perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Vol. 44, iss. 5, pp. 663–680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000462
Whisman, M.A. (2014). Dyadic perspectives on trauma and marital quality. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 207–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036143
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
