Anthropology of Plato Revisited
Philosophy "The Future of the History of Philosophy" (Thematic issue)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-493-499Keywords:
dialogues of Plato, Lysis, doctrine of man, structure of the soulAbstract
Today history of philosophy is undergoing critical rethinking. For the first generations of analytic philosophers, a true «historiophobia» was generally characteristic. However, as it often happens, the critical attitude did not abolish the interest to the thinkers of the past and did not lead to the denial of the significance of the history of philosophy as one of the forms of philosophical work. Moreover, it gave rise to new methodological approaches, which are now being actively assimilated by historians of thought. An increasing number of works have titles that include the words «Revisited» or «Rethinking». There arises an opportunity to abandon the power of classical assessments and classical hierarchies of the significant in the texts of thinkers of the past (which were formulated by authors of the 19th–20th centuries). This paper deals with Plato’s ideas about man as an example. Familiarization with a wider range of Plato’s texts destroys the traditional concept of the dominance of reason in the composition of the human being. Plato describes the human soul in such a way that it is not clear where its periphery is and where its center is. The significance of reason is unconditional, it confirms the eternity of the spiritual nature, but its use by us in earthly life is quite ambivalent. And, most importantly, participation in philosophical work is not a guarantee that we, as people-puppets from the Laws, have already «pulled out» and «overcome» ourselves, having grasped the «golden thread». Plato’s doctrine of man is not a hymn to the human mind, but a story about the fundamental incompleteness and certainly in being as fundamental features of human existence.References
Берестов И.В., Вольф М.Н., Доманов О.А. Аналитическая история философии: методы и исследования. Новосибирск: Офсет ТМ, 2019. 242 с.
Бриссон Л. Платон: Писатель, который изобрел философию / пер. с фр. О. Алиевой. М.: Rosebud Publishing, 2019. 288 с.
Говетсон Ф. Философия истории в аналитической традиции // История философии. 2017. Т. 22, № 1. С. 78–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2017-22-1-78-91
Зеннхаузер В. Платон и математика. СПб.: Изд-во РХГА, 2016. 614 c.
Мочалова И.Н. Paideia в Афинах IV в. до н.э.: «высшее образование» между деятельностью и созерцанием // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 17. Философия. Конфликтология. Культурология. Религиоведение. 2013. Вып. 2. С. 16–25.
Пресс Дж. Постановка вопроса в платоноведении / пер. А. Гараджи // Платоновский сборник: в 2 т. М.; СПб.: РГГУ; РХГА, 2014. Т. 1. C. 8–47.
Рахманин А.Ю. Фигуры Сократа и призраки Платона в философии обыденного языка после Витгенштейна // Платоновские исследования. 2019. Вып. 11(2). С. 153–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25985/PI.10.2.08
Светлов Р.В. Математическая шутка из «Политика» и пределы рациональности в философии Платона // Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. 2020. Т. 14, № 2. С. 665–673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2020-14-2-665-673
Светлов Р.В., Протопопова И.А. Исследование платоновского наследия в России: история, современность, перспективы // Платоновские исследования. 2020. Вып. 13(2). С. 11–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25985/PI.13.2.01
Шичалин Ю.А. Институциональный подход к античным философским текстам (на примере диалога «Ион») // Логос. 2020. Т. 30, № 6(139). С. 23–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2020-6-23-38
Шохин В.К. Аналитическая философия: некоторые непроторенные пути // Философский журнал. 2015. Т. 8, № 2. С. 16–27.
Annas J. Plato. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 144 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802163.001.0001
Vlastos G. The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides // Philosophical Review. 1954. Vol. 63, no. 3. P. 319–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2182692
References
Annas J. (2003) Plato. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 144 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802163.001.0001
Berestov, I.V., Vol’f, M.N. and Domanov, O.A. (2019). Analiticheskaya istoriya filosofii: metody i issledovaniya [Analytical history of philosophy: methods and research]. Novosibirsk: Ofset TM Publ., 242 p.
Brisson, L. (2019). Platon. Pisatel’, kotoryy izobrel filosofiyu [Plato. The writer who invented philosophy]. Moscow: Rosebud Publ., 288 p.
Gavetsson, F. (2017). [Philosophy of history in the analytic tradition]. Istoriya filosofii [History of Philosophy]. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 78–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2017-22-1-78-91
Mochalova, I.N. (2013). [Paideia in Athens in the 4th century b.c.: «higher education» between activity and contemplation]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 17. Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kul’turologiya. Religiovedenie [Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy. Conflictology. Cultural Studies. Religious Studies]. Iss. 2, pp. 16–25.
Press, G. (2014). [Formulation of the question in Plato’s studies]. Platonovskiy sbornik: v 2 t. [Collection of Plato’s works: in 2 vols]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: RHSU, RCSA Publ., vol. 1. pp. 8–47.
Rakhmanin, A.Yu. (2019). [Figures of Socrates and phantoms of Plato in linguistic philosophy after Wittgenstein]. Platonovskie issledovaniya [Platonic Investigations]. Iss. 11(2), pp. 153–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25985/PI.10.2.08
Shichalin, Yu.A. (2020). [An institutional approach to ancient philosophical texts: Plato’s Ion]. Logos. Vol. 30, no. 6(139), pp. 23–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2020-6-23-38
Shokhin, V.K. (2015). [Analytic philosophy: some unbeaten tracks]. Filosofskiy zhurnal [Philosophy Journal]. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 16–27.
Svetlov, R.V. (2020). [Mathematical joke from the Statesman and the limits of rationality in the philosophy of Plato]. Schole. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya [Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition]. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 665–673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2020-14-2-665-673
Svetlov, R.V. and Protopopova, I.A. (2020). [An overview of Plato’s legacy in Russia: past, present, and prospects]. Platonovskie issledovaniya [Platonic Investigations]. Iss. 13(2), pp. 11–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25985/PI.13.2.01
Vlastos, G. (1954). The third man argument in the Parmenides. Philosophical Review. Vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 319–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2182692
Zennhauzer, V. (2016). Platon i matematika [Plato and mathematics]. Saint Petersburg: RCSU Publ., 614 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
