History of temperament and character research in Russian psychology: scientometric analysis of dissertation research
«THE HISTORY OF PSYCHOLOGY: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT» (Special issue)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-1-65-77Keywords:
publication counting methods, comparative method, Russian dissertations, temperament, character, personality, scientometrics, bibliometrics, B.G. Ananiev, V.A. GansenAbstract
Based on the analysis of modern Russian research on the history of psychology, two important trends in such research have been identified — the reflection of theoretical and methodological foundations and the use of scientometric methods. The paper deals with the analysis of the dynamics of Russian dissertation research works containing the categories «temperament» and «character» in their titles; the period under study is 1992–2018. In total, the data of 128 dissertations defended in the Russian Federation during the specified period were analyzed. To structure the thematic focus of these dissertations (in accordance with V.A. Ganzen’s requirements of a systematic description of any object), the following elements (units) of the classification were used: phenomenology; varieties (types); the structure and the constituent elements; object as a substructure; the relationship of the object with other phenomena; variability and dynamics of the object; factors affecting the state of the object; methods of influence on the object; diagnostics of the object’s state; study history. The study provides a description and structuring of the data arrays formed by the authors of the paper for the specified dissertations taking into account the studied samples and centers for preparing such dissertations, their thematic focus, and scientific specialties. Based on the analysis of the number of prepared and defended dissertations, the dynamics (by three-year periods) of the development of the thematic space including the sought categories was revealed. The authors also compared the dynamics of dissertations in psychological sciences and pedagogical sciences for the same three-year periods and conducted a comparative analysis of the relative indicators of the preparation of dissertations in psychological sciences with the considered categories in the titles and other scientific papers. The analysis showed a consistently low interest of modern Russian researchers in studying these categories. Based on the analysis of data on dissertations prepared in the Soviet period, it was concluded that the category of «temperament» was intensively developed at that time (until 1992). The paper also formulates some limitations of the use of quantitative methods identified in the course of study.References
Анцупов А.Я., Кандыбович С.Л., Крук В.М., Тимченко Г.Н., Харитонов А.Н. Актуальные проблемы психологии: указатель 1362 докторских диссертаций, 1935–2014 гг. / под общ. ред. А.Я. Анцупова. М.: Ассоц. «Лига содействия оборонным предприятиям», 2015. 416 с.
Анцупов А.Я., Кандыбович С.Л., Крук В.М., Тимченко Г.Н., Харитонов А.Н. Проблемы психологического исследования: указатель 1050 докторских диссертаций, 1935–2007 гг. / под ред. А.Я. Анцупова. М.: Студия «Этника», 2007. 232 с.
Анцупов А.Я., Помогайбин В.Н., Пошивалкин О.А. Методологические проблемы военно-психологических исследований: обзор диссертаций — XX век. М.: Современный гуманитарный институт, 2000. 527 с.
Ганзен В.А. Системные описания в психологии. Л.: Изд-во Ленингр. ун-та,1984. 176 с.
Дорфман Л.Я. Методологический анализ теории интегральной индивидуальности В.С. Мерлина // Методология и история психологии. 2008. Т. 3, вып. 3. С. 106–121.
Елисеева И.Н. История развития отечественной экстремальной психологии: автореф. дис. ... канд. психол. наук. М., 2015. 26 с.
Елисеева И.Н., Олейник Ю.Н. Наукометрический анализ отечественных диссертационных исследований, содержащих в названиях категорию «способности» (1992–2018) // Индивидуальное, национальное и глобальное в сознании современного человека: новые идеи, проблемы, научные направления / отв. ред. Н.В. Борисова, М.И. Воловикова, А.Л. Журавлев. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2020. С. 76–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/univ.2020.55.72.005
Елисеева И.Н., Олейник Ю.Н. Наукометрический анализ как метод изучения состояния и динамики научного направления (на примере использования категории «индивидуальность» в названиях диссертационных исследований, 1992–2018 гг.) // Методология, теория, история психологии личности: сб. ст. / отв. ред. А.Л. Журавлев, Е.А. Никитина, Н.Е. Харламенкова. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2019. С. 218–233.
Евдокимов В.И., Зотова А.В., Рыбников В.Ю. Медицинская психология: наукометрический анализ диссертационных исследований (1980–2012 гг.). СПб.: Политехника-сервис, 2013. 76 с.
Кольцова В.А. История психологии. Проблемы методологии. М.: Когито-Центр: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2008. 511 с.
Логинова Н.А. Исследование одаренности в Петербургской психологической школе // Способности и ментальные ресурсы человека в мире глобальных перемен. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2020. С. 223–230.
Мазилов В.А., Слепко Ю.Н. Способности и одаренность в психологии: современное состояние отечественных и зарубежных исследований // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2021. Т. 18, № 3. С. 598–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-598-622
Моргун А.Н., Олейник Ю.Н., Журавлев А.Л. Институциональные факторы развития отечественной истории психологии (на материале РИНЦ) // Психологический журнал. 2021. T. 42, № 1. C. 111–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920013341-1
Моргун А.Н., Олейник Ю.Н., Журавлев А.Л. Тематические направления отечественной истории психологии как внутренние факторы развития отрасли: наукометрический анализ на материале РИНЦ // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Социальная и экономическая психология. 2021. Т. 6, № 1(21). С. 219–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep.2021.21.1.009
Олейник Ю.Н. История психологии как история научных проблем: проблемологический подход // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Человек и мир. 2018. Т. 2, № 1. С. 20–40.
Пермская психологическая диссердиада / сост. Б.А. Вяткин; Перм. гос. гум.-пед. ун-т. Пермь, 2015. 23 c.
References
Antsupov, A.YA., Kandybovich, S.L., Kruk, V.M., Timchenko, G.N., Kharitonov, A.N. (2007). Problemy psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya: Ukazatel’ 1050 doktorskikh dissertatsiy. 1935–2007 gg. [Problems of psychological research. Index of 1050 doctoral dissertations. 1935–2007]. Moscow: Studio «Ethnika» Publ., 232 p.
Antsupov, A.YA., Kandybovich, S.L., Kruk, V.M., Timchenko, G.N., Kharitonov, A.N. (2015). Aktual’nye problemy psikhologii: Ukazatel’ 1362 doktorskikh dissertatsiy. 1935–2014 gg. [Actual problems of psychology. Index of 1362 doctoral dissertations. 1935–2014]. Moscow: Assoc. «League for Assistance to Defense Enterprises» Publ., 416 p.
Antsupov, A.Ya., Pomogaybin, V.N. and Poshivalkin, O.A. (2000). Metodologicheskie problemy voenno-psikhologicheskikh issledovaniy: obzor dissertatsiy — XX vek [Methodological problems of military psychological research: a review of dissertations — 20th century]. Moscow: MUH Publ., 527 p.
Dorfman, L.Ya. (2008). [Methodological analysis of the theory of integral individuality V.S. Merlin]. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii [Methodology and History of Psychology]. Vol. 3, iss. 3, pp. 106–121.
Eliseeva, I.N. (2015). Istoriya razvitiya otechestvennoy ekstremal’noy psikhologii: avtoref. dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [History of the development of domestic extreme psychology: Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation]. Moscow, 26 p.
Eliseeva, I.N. and Oleynik, Yu.N. (2020). [Scientometric analysis of domestic dissertational studies that contain the category «abilities» in their titles (1992–2018)]. Individual’noe, natsional’noe i global’noe v soznanii sovremennogo cheloveka: novye idei, problemy, nauchnye napravleniya [Individual, national and global in the minds of modern man: new ideas, problems, scientific directions]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., pp. 76–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/univ.2020.55.72.005
Eliseeva, I.N. and Oleynik, Yu.N. (2019). [The concept of «individuality» in the titles of dissertations 1992–2018 (scientific analysis)]. Metodologiya, teoriya, istoriya psikhologii lichnosti [Methodology, theory, history of personality psychology]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., pp. 218–233.
Evdokimov, V.I., Zotova, A.V. and Rybnikov, V.Yu. (2013). Meditsinskaya psikhologiya: naukometricheskiy analiz dissertatsionnykh issledovaniy (1980–2012 gg.) [Medical psychology: scientometric analysis of dissertation research (1980–2012)]. St. Petersburg: Politekhnika-Service Publ., 76 p.
Ganzen, V.A. (1984). Sistemnye opisaniya v psikhologii [System descriptions in psychology]. Leningrad: Leningrad University Publ., 176 p.
Kol’tsova, V.A. (2008). Istoriya psikhologii. Problemy metodologii [History of psychology: Problems of methodology]. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr Publ., IP RAS Publ., 511 p.
Loginova, N.A. (2020). [Research on giftedness at the St. Petersburg psychological school]. Sposobnosti i mental’nye resursy cheloveka v mire global’nykh peremen [Abilities and mental resources of a person in a world of global change]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., pp. 223–230.
Mazilov, V.A. and Slepko, Yu.N. (2021). [Abilities and giftedness in psychology: the current state of domestic and foreign research]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 598–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-598-622
Morgun, A.N., Oleynik, Yu.N. and Zhuravlev, A.L. (2021). [Institutional factors in the development of the domestic history of psychology (on the material of the RSCI)]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 111–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920013341-1
Morgun, A.N., Oleynik, Yu.N. and Zhuravlev, A.L. (2021). [Thematic directions of domestic history of psychology as internal factors of the industry development: scientometric analysis based on the RSCI material]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology]. Vol. 6, no. 1(21), pp. 219–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep.2021.21.1.009
Oleynik, Yu.N. (2018). [History of psychology as a history of scientific problems: a problemological approach]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Chelovek i mir [Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Man and the World]. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 20–40.
Vyatkin, B.A. (ed.) (2015). Permskaya psikhologicheskaya disserdiada [Perm psychological dissertation]. Perm: PSHPU Publ., 23 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
