What does the Schwartz’s model inquire into?

Sociology

Authors

  • Alexandr E. Kuznetsov Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Keywords:

values, cross-cultural research, positivism

Abstract

Some of the claims made by S.H. Schwartz to have successfully tested his own model of values analysis can be explained by flawed logic and items (circular reasoning, use of seemingly universal items, belief in value-neutral descriptions, reliance on assumptions of social-choice theories). It is shown that Schwartz’s model items are not of general purpose but discrete. At the same time they are of value-coloured content. Therefore it is difficult to estimate the similarities and differences of cultures in the light of the answers of respondents, representing them. Social-choice theories’ presumptions can be unproductive as well owing to society’s class structure.

Author Biography

Alexandr E. Kuznetsov, Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Ph.D. in Sociology, Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology and Political Science

References

(1). Безуглова Н.П. Понятие «культура» в сравнительных исследованиях культур. URL: www.gramota.net/materials/3/2012/2-2/5.html (дата обращения: 28.07.2014).

(2). Парсонс Т. О структуре социального действия. 2-е изд. М.: Академ. проект, 2002. 880 с.

(3). Россия в Европе: по материалам международного проекта «Европейское социальное исследование» / под. общ. ред. А.В. Андреенковой и Л.А. Беляевой. М.: Асаdеmiа. 2009. 384 с.

(4). Cox T.B. Rimrock revisited: an ethnographic study of the homesteader community of Fence Lake, New Mexico. URL: https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsoai.repo.nii.ac.jp%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dpages_view_main%26active_action%3Drepository_action_common_download%26item_id%3D1167%26item_no%3D1%26attribute_id%3D22%26file_no%3D1%26page_id%3D13%26block_id%3D17&ei=defaU_KnMcXc4QSvpICoCA&usg=AFQjCNH9nAWlZK4tNJczdRth5IrW_WImgw&bvm=bv.72197243,d.bGE&cad=rjt (date of access: 29.07.2014).

(5). Davidov E., Schmidt P., Schwartz S.H. Bringing values back in: the adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 72. Issue 3. P. 420–445. URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-66692 (date of access: 28.07.2014).

(6). Hofstede G. Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney // Human Relations. 2002. Vol. 55(11). URL: http://users.utu.fi/freder/hofstede.pdf (date of access: 28.07.2014).

(7). Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill, 2010.

(8). Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context // Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2011. Vol. 2(1). URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 (date of access: 28.07.2014).

(9). Kluckhohn C. (1951) Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification // Parsons T. & Shils E.A. (eds.). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. URL: https://archive.org/details/towardgeneralthe00pars (date of access: 21.06.2014).

(10). Maynard D.W., Clayman S.E. The diversity of ethnomethodology // Annual Review of Sociology. 1991. Vol. 17. P. 385–418. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083348 (date of access: 21.06.2014)

(11). McSweeney B. Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith — a failure of analysis // Human Relations. 2002. Vol. 55. P. 89–118. URL: http://www.uk.sagepub.com/managingandorganizations/downloads/Online%20articles/ch05/4%20-%20McSweeney.pdf (date of access: 28.07.2014).

(12). Nardon L., Steers R.M. The culture theory jungle: divergence and convergence in models of national culture In: Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organizations, and Work / eds. by R.S. Bhagat, R.M. Steers. 2009. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581151.002 (date of access: 21.06.2014).

(13). Schwartz S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues. 1994. Vol. 50, No. 4. P. 19–45. URL: http://dev.crs.org.pl:4444/rid%3D1K6GFZBH9-255VHHF-GZ/Schwartz%25201994%2520-%2520Are%2520there%2520universal%2520aspects%2520in%2520the%2520content%2520of%2520human%2520values.pdf (date of access: 21.06.2014).

(14). Schwartz S.H. A Theory of cultural values and some implications for work // Applied Psychology: An International Review. 1999. Vol. 48(1). P. 23–47. URL: http://www.winfo-base.de/lehre%5Clv_materialien.nsf/intern01/86A6F70E229D92A6C1257871005977E8/$FILE/Schwartz%20-%20Cultural%20Values,%20Work%20Values.pdf (date of access: 21.06.2014).

(15). Schwartz S.H. (). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values // Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2012. Vol. 2(1). URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116 (date of access: 30.07.2014).

(16). Spates J.L. The sociology of values // Ann. Rev. Sociol. 1983. Vol. 9. P.27–49. URL: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~vid/Readings/Spates_1983_Sociology_of_Values.pdf (date of access: 21.06.2014).

References

(1). Bezuglova N.P. Ponyatie «kul’tura» v sravnitel’nykh issledovaniyakh kul’tur [The concept of culture in comparative studies of culture]. Available at: http://www.gramota.net/materials/3/2012/2-2/5.html (accessed: 28.07.2014). (In Russian).

(2). Parsons T. O strukture sotsial’nogo dejstviya [The structure of social action]. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt Publ., 2002, 880 p. (In Russian).

(3). Rossiya v Evrope: po materialam mezhdunarodnog proekta «Evropejskoe sotsial’noe issledovanie» [Russia in Europe: following international project «European social research»] Moscow, Асаdеmiа Publ., 2009, 384 p. (In Russian).

(4). Cox T.B. Rimrock revisited: an ethnographic study of the homesteader community of Fence Lake, New Mexico. Available at: https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsoai.repo.nii.ac.jp%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dpages_view_main%26active_action%3Drepository_action_common_download%26item_id%3D1167%26item_no%3D1%26attribute_id%3D22%26file_no%3D1%26page_id%3D13%26block_id%3D17&ei=defaU_KnMcXc4QSvpICoCA&usg=AFQjCNH9nAWlZK4tNJczdRth5IrW_WImgw&bvm=bv.72197243,d.bGE&cad=rjt (accessed: 29.07.2014).

(5). Davidov E., Schmidt P., Schwartz S.H. Bringing values back in: the adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. // Public Opinion Quarterly, 2008, vol. 72, issue 3, pp. 420–445. Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-66692 (accessed: 28.07.2014).

(6). Hofstede G. () Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney // Human Relations, 2002, vol. 55(11). Available at: http://users.utu.fi/freder/hofstede.pdf (accessed: 28.07.2014).

(7). Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill, 2010.

(8). Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2011, vol. 2(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 (accessed: 28.07.2014).

(9). Kluckhohn C. Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification // T. Parsons & E.A. Shils (eds.) Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1951. Available at: https://archive.org/details/towardgeneralthe00pars (accessed: 21.06.2014).

(10). Maynard D.W., Clayman S.E. The diversity of ethnomethodology // Annual Review of Sociology, 1991, vol. 17, pp. 385–418. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083348 (accessed: 21.06.2014).

(11). McSweeney B. Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith — a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 2002, vol. 55, pp. 89–118. Available at: http://www.uk.sagepub.com/managingandorganizations/downloads/Online%20articles/ch05/4%20-%20McSweeney.pdf (accessed: 28.07.2014)

(12). Nardon L., Steers R.M. (2009) The culture theory jungle: divergence and convergence in models of national culture // Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organizations, and Work / eds. Rabi S. Bhagat and Richard M. Steers. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581151.002 (accessed: 21.06.2014)

(13). Schwartz S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, vol. 50, no 4, 1994, pp. 19–45. Available at: http://dev.crs.org.pl:4444/rid%3D1K6GFZBH9-255VHHF-GZ/Schwartz%25201994%2520-%2520Are%2520there%2520universal%2520aspects%2520in%2520the%2520content%2520of%2520human%2520values.pdf (accessed: 21.06.2014)

(14). Schwartz S.H. A Theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1999, vol. 48 (1), pp. 23–47. Available at: http://www.winfo-base.de/lehre%5Clv_materialien.nsf/intern01/86A6F70E229D92A6C1257871005977E8/$FILE/Schwartz%20-%20Cultural%20Values,%20Work%20Values.pdf schwartz 1999 (accessed: 21.06.2014).

(15). Schwartz S.H. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2012, vol. 2(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116 (accessed: 30.07.2014).

(16). Spates J.L. The sociology of values // Ann. Rev. Sociol. 1983, vol. 9, pp: 27–49. Available at: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~vid/Readings/Spates_1983_Sociology_of_Values.pdf (accessed: 21.06.2014).

Published

2014-09-30

Issue

Section

Sociology

Categories