From understanding to intersubjectivity: experience of the social and philosophical reflection
Philosophy
Keywords:
understanding, intersubjectivity, dialogue, technogenic civilization, «technosphere», informatization, «The Other», experiences, human nature, one-dimensional personAbstract
Speaking about value of a phenomenon of understanding of an intersubjectivity in experience refraction of a social and philosophical reflection, authors formulate and prove an idea of the social and philosophical analysis of understanding and intersubjectivity as categorial forms of experience of interaction. The research contains a hypothesis that understanding and intersubjectivity are the principles of life of the person and society. Understanding and intersubjectivity consideration as the philosophical categories forming structure of interaction, gives the chance of their application to judgment of all social processes in human society. The given concept of the philosophical analysis of understanding and intersubjectivity is carried out through identification of metaphysical, ontological, axiological, emistemological, methodological, praxeological grounds.References
(1). Бодрийяр Ж. Система вещей. М.: Рудомино, 1999. 224 с.
(2). Достоевский Ф.М. Братья Карамазовы // Полн. собр. соч.: в 30 т. Л.: Наука, 1976. Т. 14. 511 с.
(3). Кули Ч. Социальная самость // Американская социологическая мысль / под ред. В.И. Добренькова. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1994. С. 314–327.
(4). Лиотар Ж.-Ф. Заметки о смыслах «пост» // Иностранная литература. 1994. № 1. С. 56–59.
(5). Никитин С.В. «Человеческая природа» и эгоизм в философии И. Канта // Философия Канта и основания практической философии. Саратов: Новый проект, 2013. 240 с.
(6). Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. / под ред. В.С. Стёпина. М.: Мысль, 2010. Т. 2. 634 с.
(7). Огурцов А.П. Интерсубъективность как поле философских исследований // Личность. Культура. Общество. 2007. Вып. 1(34). С. 58–69.
(8). Огурцов А.П. Интерсубъективность как проблема философии науки // Философия науки. Вып. 14: Онтология науки. М.: ИФ РАН, 2009. С. 235–247.
(9). Рильке Р.-М. Новые стихотворения. М.: Наука, 1977. 543 с.
(10). Розанов В.В. О понимании: Опыт исследования природы, границ и внутреннего строения науки как цельного знания / ред. и коммент. В.Г. Сукачева, вступ. ст. В.В. Бибихина. М.: Танаис, 1995. 804 с.
(11). Свифт Д. Путешествие Лемюэля Гулливера. Путешествие в страну гуигнгнмов. М.: Дет. лит., 1980. 511 с.
(12). Устьянцев В.Б., Орлов М.О., Аникин Д.А., Федин Д.С. Институализация и ценностные ориентации молодежи в обществе риска. Саратов: Изд-во Сарат. ун-та, 2010. 208 с.
(13). Философия: энциклопед. словарь / под ред. А.А. Ивина. М.: Гардарики, 2004. 1072 с
(14). Франк С. Смысл жизни // Смысл жизни: антология. М.: Прогресс–Культура, 1994. 592 с.
(15). Чехов А.П. Полн. собр. соч. и писем: в 30 т. М.: Наука, 1986. Т. 12. 327 с.
(16). Элиас Н. Общество индивидов. М.: Праксис, 2001. 336 с.
(17). Barnard R. Philosophy as continuous with social science? // Metascience. 2014. Vol. 23. Issue 1. P. 153–156.
(18). Frega R. Between Pragmatism and Critical Theory: Social Philosophy Today // Human Studies. 2013. Р. 1–29.
(19). Fuchs T. The phenomenology and development of social perspectives // Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2013. Vol. 12. Issue 4. P. 655–683.
(20). Gallagher S., Varga S. Social Constraints on the Direct Perception of Emotions and Intentions // Topoi. 2014. Vol. 33. Issue 1. P. 185–199.
(21). Shinichi Hoshi. Osekkaina kamigami. Tokyo: Shinchosya, 1979. 282 p.
References
(1). Baudrillard J. Sistema veschej [The system of objects]. Moscow, Rudomino Publ., 1999, 224 p. (In Russian).
(2). Dostoyevsky F.M. [The Brothers Karamazov]. Polnoe sobraniye sochinenij: v 30 tomakh [Complete set of works in 30 volumes]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1976, vol. 14, 511 p. (In Russian).
(3). Cooley Ch. [Social Consciousness]. Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl’ [American sociological thought]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1994, pp. 314–327. (In Russian).
(4). Lyotard J.-F. [Notes about meanings of «post-»]. Inostrannaya literatura [Foreign literature]. 1994, no 1, pp. 56–59. (In Russian).
(5). Nikitin S.V. [«Human nature» and egoism in Kant’s philosophy]. Filosofiya Kanta i osnovaniya prakticheskoj filosofii [Kant’s philosophy and the basics of practical philosophy]. Saratov, Novyj proekt Publ., 2013, 240 p. (In Russian).
(6). Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 tomakh. [New philosophical encyclopedia in 4 volumes]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2010, vol. 2, 634 p. (In Russian).
(7). Ogurtsov A.P. [Intersubjectivity as a field of philosophical research]. Lichnost. Kul’tura. Obschestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. 2007, no 1(34), pp. 58–69. (In Russian).
(8). Ogurtsov A.P. [Intersubjectivity as a problem of philosophy of science]. Filosofiya nauki 2009, vypusk 14: Ontologiya nauki [Philosophy of science 2009, no 14: Ontology of science]. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy of Russian Academy of Science Publ., 2009, pp. 235–247. (In Russian).
(9). Rilke R.M. Novye stikhotvoreniya [New poems]. Moscow, Nauka publ., 1977, 543 p. (In Russian).
(10). Rozanov V.V. O ponimanii: Opyt issledovaniya prirody, granits i vnutrennego stroeniya nauki kak tsel’nogo znaniya [Conserning understanding: Research experience of nature, borders and internal structure of science as the entire knowledge]. Moscow, Tanais Publ., 1995, 804 p. (In Russian).
(11). Swift J. Puteshestvie Lemuelya Gullivera. Puteshestvie v starn guigngnmov [Gulliver’s travels. A voyage to the country of the houyhnhnms]. Moscow, Detskaya literatura Publ., 1980, 511 p. (In Russian).
(12). Ust’yantsev V.B., Orlov M.O., Anikin D.A., Fedin D.S. Institualizatsiya i tsennostnye orientatsii molodyozhi v obschestve riska [Institutionalization and youth’ system of values in risk society]. Saratov, Saratov State University Publ., 2010, 208 p. (In Russian).
(13). Filosofiya: entsiklopedicheskij slovar’ [Philosophy: encyclopedic al dictionary]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2004, 1072 p. (In Russian).
(14). Frank S. [Sense of life]. Smysl zhizni: Antologiya [Sense of life: anthology]. Moscow, Progress-Kul’tura Publ., 1994, 592 p. (In Russian).
(15). Chekhov A.P. Polnoe sobraniye sochinenij i pisem: v 30 tomakh. [Complete set of works and letters: in 30 volumes]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986, vol. 12. 327 p. (In Russian).
(16). Elias N. Obschestvo individov [The society of individuals]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2001, 336 p. (In Russian).
(17). Barnard R. Philosophy as continuous with social science? // Metascience. 2014, vol. 23, issue 1, pp. 153–156.
(18). Frega R. Between Pragmatism and Critical Theory: Social Philosophy Today // HumanStudies. 2013, pp. 1–29.
(19). Fuchs T. The phenomenology and development of social perspectives // Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2013, vol. 12, issue 4, pp. 655–683.
(20). Gallagher S., Varga S. Social Constraints on the Direct Perception of Emotions and Intentions // Topoi. 2014, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 185–199.
(21). Shin’ichi Hoshi. Osekkainakamigami. Tokyo: Shinchosya, 1979. 282 p.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
