Metaphysics and Genealogy: World War One in the Assessment of Philosophers and Literators
Keywords:
World War One, philosophy, metaphysics of war, M. Scheler, T. Mann, J. H. Muirhead, H. BergsonAbstract
The author analyzes conceptualizations of causes, objectives and actors of the World War One in the polemical texts written by different philosophers and novelists. The author argues that certain schemes of conceptualizing war logically determine the attitude to war. Scheler and Mann, who ignore the hideous realities of war and depoliticize its causes and goals, build metaphysical interpretations, which vindicate atrocities. On the one hand, they postulate that fighting is about unique ways of life, incommensurable ideals; on the other hand, they essentialize the combating sides as unified entities. This schematization presents war as a battle for the very existence and makes any future peace impossible. In contrast to the “metaphysical” and “apolitical” interpretation of war, Bergson and Muirhead, despite their bitter criticism of German militarism, trace its genealogy and see Germany as a complex cultural phe-nomenon, which is irreducible to the rapacious policy of the present government. Yet, they both recognize that big abstract principles are coming that in fact guide and direct the conflicting parties. Bergson attacks mechanicism, while Muirhead places all blame on the German elites’ materialism. However, the sensitivity to internal complexity and historical dynamics of social development in the opposing state opens to them the opportunity to find common ground, to establish points of rapprochement, and thereby to dispel the illusion of the “dark force” induced by the war-time propaganda; overall, it opens the path to peace.doi10.17072/2219-3111-2018-3-89-96References
Библиографический список
Булгаков С. Война и русское самосознание: Публ. лекция. М.: Типография И.Д. Сытина, 1915. 59 c.
Манн Т. Размышления аполитичного. М.: АСТ, 2015. 544 с.
BergsonH. L’Allemagneet son mécanisme.Séance publiqueannuelle de l'Académie des Sciences mo-ralesetpolitiques.1915. URL: https://www.europeana.eu/portal/en/record/9200312/Bibliographic Resource_3000093756411.html (дата обращения: 22.07.2018).
De Warren N. Les deuxguerresmondialeset la philosophie (Entretien avec Nicolas de Warren) // Le Philosophoire 2017. Vol. 2.No. 48. P. 39–57.
De Warren N. The First World War, Philosophy, and Europe // TijdschriftvoorFilosofie, 2014. Vol. 76.No. 4. P. 715–737.
Luft H.S. Germany’s Metaphysical War. Reflections on War by Two Representatives of German Phi-losophy: Max Scheler and Paul Natorp // ThemenportalErsterWeltkrieg. 2007. URL: http://www.erster-weltkrieg.clio-online.de/2007/Article=208 (дата обращения: 22.07.2018).
Mollier J.-Y. 1914–1918: La Mobilisation des intellectuels au service de la guerre // French History and Civilization. 2014. Vol. 6.Ed. J. Kalman.URL: https://h-france.net/rude/vol6/mollier6/ (дата обращения: 22.07.2018).
Muirhead J.H. German Philosophy in Relation to the War. London: John Murray, 1915. URL: https://archive.org/details/germanphilosophy00muirrich (датаобращения: 22.07.2018).
Prochasson C. Les Intellectuelsfrançaiset la Grande Guerre // Bulletin des bibliothèques de France/ 2014. No. 3.Pp. 38-45. URL: http://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2014-03-0038-003 (датаобращения: 22.07.2018).
Scheler M. ZurMetaphysik des Krieges // Der Genius des Krieges und der Deutsche Krieg. Leipzig: VerlagderWeissenBuecher, 1917. S. 117–153.
References
Bergson, H. (1915), L’Allemagneet son mécanisme. Séance publiqueannuelle de l'Académie des Sciences mo-ralesetpolitiques, available at:https://www.europeana.eu/portal/en/record/9200312/BibliographicResource_ 3000093756411.html (accessed 22.07.2018).
Bulgakov, S. (1915), Voynairusskoesamosoznanie.Publichnayalektsiya [War and Russian Self-Understanding.Public Lecture], Tipografiya I.D. Sytina, Moscow, Russia, 59 p.
De Warren, N. (2014), “The First World War, Philosophy, and Europe”, TijdschriftvoorFilosofie, V. 76, No. 4, p. 715–737.
De Warren, N. (2017), “Les deuxguerresmondiales et la philosophie (Entretien avec Nicolas de Warren)”, Le Philosophoire, V. 2, No. 48, p. 39-57.
Luft, H.S. (2007), “Germany’s Metaphysical War. Reflections on War by Two Representatives of German Phi-losophy: Max Scheler and Paul Natorp”, ThemenportalErsterWeltkrieg, available at: http://www.erster-weltkrieg.clio-online.de/2007/Article=208 (accessed 22.07.2018).
Mann, T. (2015), Razmyshleniyaapolitichnogo[Reflections of a Non-Political Man], AST, Moscow, Russia, 544 p.
Mollier, J.-Y. (2014), “1914-1918: La Mobilisation des intellectuels au service de la guerre”, French History and Civilization, Volume 6, available at: https://h-france.net/rude/vol6/mollier6/ (accessed 22.07.2018).
Muirhead, J.H. (1915), German Philosophy in Relation to the War, John Murray, London, UK, 110 p., available at: https://archive.org/details/germanphilosophy00muirrich (accessed 22.07.2018).
Prochasson, C. (2014), “Les Intellectuelsfrançais et la Grande Guerre”, Bulletin des bibliothèques de France, No. 3, p. 38-45, available at: http://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2014-03-0038-003 (accessed 22.07.2018).
Scheler, M. (1917), “ZurMetaphysik des Krieges”, in Der Genius des Krieges und der Deutsche Krieg, Verlag der WeissenBuecher, Leipzig, Deutschland, p. 117–153.
