Глобальная роль Евросоюза: что и как объясняет организационная теория

Ирина Прохоренко / Irina Prokhorenko

Аннотация


В статье оценивается когнитивный потенциал организационной теории в анализе глобальной роли Европейского союза, прежде всего, как нормативной силы в мировой политике в рамках политики расширения, соседства, меж- и трансрегионализма, содействия международному развитию, деятельности в рамках международных институтов. Рассматриваются возможности использования таких ключевых понятий организационной теории, как «организация», «организационные поля», «организационные изменения», в методологии исследования основных направлений внешнеполитической стратегии ЕС


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2015-2-5-17


Ключевые слова


Европейский союз; европейское политическое пространство; глобальная стратегия ЕС; организационная теория; организационные поля; организационные изменения

Полный текст:

PDF

Литература


The European Union in the XXI century: time of trials / ed. by O.U.Potemkina. Moscow: Ves’ mir, 2012. 656 p. (In Rus.).

Betts A. The global governance of migration and the role of trans-regionalism. In: Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership / ed. by Kunz R., Lavenex S., Panizzon M. London, New York: Routledge, 2011. P. 2345. (In English).

Bourdieu P. Haute couture and haute culture. – In: Sociology in Question / Transl. by R. Nice. London: Sage, 1993. Pp. 132–138. (In English).

Daft R.L. Organization theory and design. 8th ed. Mason, Ohio: South-Western, 2004. 656 p. (In English).

Díaz-Silveira Santos C. La estratégia inter-regional de la Unión Europea con Latinoamérica. Madrid: Plaza Y Valdés S.L., 2010.420 p. (In English).

Diez T. Europe’s others and the return of geopolitics // Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2006. Vol. 17. No 2. P. 319-335. (In English).

DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields // American Sociological Review. 1983. Vol. 48. No 2. P. 147-160. (In English).

Emerson M., Balfour R., Biscop S., Kaczynski P.M, Renard Tm., Wouters J. Upgrading the EU's role as global actor: institutions, law and the restructuring of European diplomacy. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2011. 100 p. (In English).

Emirbayer M., Johnson V. Bourdieu and organizational analysis // Theory and Society. 2008. Vol. 37. No 1. Pp. 1–44. (In English).

EU Neighbourhood Info Centre [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.enpiinfo.eu/main.php?id=344&id_type=2 (access date: 10.04.2015). (In English).

Europe's Global Role: External Policies of the European Union / ed. by J.Orbie. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009. 284 p. (In English).

Fligstein N. Social skill and the theory of fields // Sociological Theory. 2001. Vol. 19. No 2. Pp. 105-125. (In English).

Fligstein N., McAdam D. A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 256 p. (In English).

Interregionalism and international relations / ed. by Hänggi J., Rollof R., Rüland J. New York: Routledge, 2006. 384 р. (In English).

Hatch M.J., Cunliffe A.L. Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. 3d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 384 p. (In English).

Hyde-Price A. “Normative power Europe”: a realist critique // Journal of European Public Policy. 2006. Vol. 13. No 2. P. 217-234. (In English).

Hoffman A.J. Linking organizational and field-level analyses: the diffusion of corporate environmental practice // Organization and Environment. 2001. Vol. 14. No 2. Pp. 133-158. (In English).

Keukeleire S., Delreux T. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. 2nd. rev. ed. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 408 p. (In English).

Manners I. Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002. Vol. 40. No 2. P. 234-258. (In English).

Nicolaïdis K., Egan M. Transnational market governance and regional policy externality: why recognize foreign standards? // Journal of European Public Policy. 2001. Vol. 8, No 3. P. 454-473. (In English).

Pace M. Paradoxes and contradictions in EU democracy promotion in the Mediterranean: the limits of EU normative power // Democratization. 2009. Vol. 16. No 1. P. 39-58. (In English).

Scott W.R. Conceptualizing organizational fields: Linking organizations and societal systems. – In: Systems rationality and parcial interests / ed. by Derlien H., Gerhardt U., Scharpf F. Baden: Nomos, 1994. Pp. 203-221. (In English).

Scott W.R. Institutions and organizations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2001. 280 p. (In English).

Scott W.R. Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology // Annual Review of Sociology. 2004. Vol. 30. No 1. Pp. 1-21. (In English).

Smith M.E. A liberal grand strategy in a realist world? Power, purpose and the EU's changing global role // Journal of European Public Policy. 2011. Vol.18. No 2. P. 144-163. (In English).

The Oxford handbook of organizational theory: meta-theoretical perspectives / ed. by Tsoukas H., Knudsen Ch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 666 p. (In English).

Weick K. E., Quinn R.E. Organizational change and development // Annual Review of Psychology. 1999. Vol. 50. Pp. 361-386. (In English).

Youngs R. Normative dynamics and strategic interests in the EU’s external identity // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2004. Vol. 42. No 2. P. 415-436. (In English).


Ссылки

  • На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.


(c) 2018 Вестник Пермского университета. Политология / Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science

Вестник Пермского университета. Политология на elibrary